Compare commits

..
Author SHA1 Message Date
tudor ca4fc647a5 Merge pull request 'fix(detail): let the special-school note span the full container width' (#72) from fix/special-note-full-width into main
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Backend (FastAPI) (push) Successful in 13s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Frontend (Next.js) (push) Successful in 55s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Pipeline (Meltano + dbt + Airflow) (push) Successful in 14s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Deploy to Staging (push) Successful in 1s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / E2E Journeys against Staging (push) Successful in 43s
Reviewed-on: #72
2026-07-20 21:53:27 +00:00
TudorandClaude Opus 4.8 261403bcd2 fix(detail): let the special-school note span the full container width
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m1s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 11s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 45s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 13s
Drop the note's `max-width: 72ch`, which left it stopping well short of the
section's right edge. It now fills the results-section container like the
subtitle paragraph above it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-20 22:49:11 +01:00
tudor e4c8b86fe7 Merge pull request 'fix(detail): align Ofsted Report Card grade chips' (#71) from fix/report-card-chip-alignment into main
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Backend (FastAPI) (push) Successful in 14s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Frontend (Next.js) (push) Successful in 52s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Pipeline (Meltano + dbt + Airflow) (push) Successful in 13s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Deploy to Staging (push) Successful in 0s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / E2E Journeys against Staging (push) Successful in 44s
Reviewed-on: #71
2026-07-20 21:32:45 +00:00
TudorandClaude Opus 4.8 1c1df77961 fix(detail): align Ofsted Report Card grade chips
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m4s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 11s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 44s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 9s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 8s
The grade boxes rendered inconsistently: Safeguarding "Met" was a small
0.8125rem inline pill while grade values ("Strong") were 1.25rem full-width
chips, and because category labels wrap to one or two lines each value sat at
a different vertical position. Two-line values like "Expected standard" also
produced a taller box.

Add a scoped `.gradeGrid` modifier (Report Card + OEIF grids in both the
primary and secondary detail views) that reserves two label lines so every
chip shares a baseline, and gives all value chips one font size, padding and
min-height — long text wraps inside an equal-height chip via max-width:100%.
Scoped rather than touching the shared `.metricCard`/`.metricValue` used by
the finance, phonics and admissions sections.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-20 22:31:58 +01:00
tudor 993822d769 Merge pull request 'fix: don’t portray special schools as failing the mainstream benchmark' (#70) from fix/special-schools-not-failing into main
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Backend (FastAPI) (push) Successful in 14s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Frontend (Next.js) (push) Successful in 53s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Pipeline (Meltano + dbt + Airflow) (push) Successful in 14s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Deploy to Staging (push) Successful in 7s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / E2E Journeys against Staging (push) Failing after 3m40s
Reviewed-on: #70
2026-07-20 21:14:57 +00:00
TudorandClaude Opus 4.8 0b36eace9d fix(review): accurate PRU/AP copy, unbundle same-school trend, de-dupe note CSS
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 46s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 12s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 1m38s
Three review points on the special-schools change:

1. Copy accuracy — the context note said "Its pupils have special educational
   needs" for every isSpecialSchool() match, but the helper also matches pupil
   referral units and alternative provision, whose pupils are educated outside
   a mainstream setting (e.g. after exclusion) and are not necessarily SEND.
   Extracted a shared <SpecialSchoolNote> with type-aware copy: SEND wording
   only for genuine special schools; PRUs/AP get their own accurate wording.

2. Same-school trend was conflated with the England comparison — SchoolRow's
   year-over-year trend arrow (and the school's own figure) were gated on the
   same flag that drops the vs-England delta, hiding a still-meaningful trend
   for special schools with real data. Split the two: the school's OWN RWM
   figure + trend show whenever there's a real value (special schools
   included; only a placeholder all-zero row is hidden); only the vs-England
   delta is additionally dropped for special/PRU/AP. Mirrored in
   SecondarySchoolRow (own Attainment 8 shown; only the vs-LA delta dropped).

3. De-duplicated the .specialNote CSS (was copy-pasted between the two detail
   view module files) into SpecialSchoolNote.module.css, owned by the shared
   component so it can't drift.

New SpecialSchoolNote unit tests assert SEND wording for special schools and
NOT for PRUs/AP. tsc clean; 112/112 unit.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-20 22:09:32 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 4.8 de943ded19 fix(review): don't suppress a genuine mainstream 0 in the rows
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 6s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 11s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 49s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 1m48s
Review feedback: the rankings/search rows treated any exactly-0 attainment as
not comparable regardless of school type, so a genuine 0 at a mainstream
school rendered as "—" (looks like missing data) and dropped its delta —
stricter and inconsistent with SchoolDetailView's placeholder check.

- SchoolRow: match SchoolDetailView's ks2Placeholder signature — suppress only
  when ALL of RWM + reading + writing + maths are 0 (special/suppressed
  signature), not on a bare rwm === 0. A genuine 0% combined (some pupils met
  individual subjects but not all three) is not all-zero, so it stays
  comparable and shows its real figure + trend.
- SecondarySchoolRow: Attainment 8 is a single 0–80 score with no subject
  breakdown to form an all-zero signature, so key off establishment type only
  (drop the bare att8 === 0 guard). A genuine (if extreme) 0.0 shows its value
  + LA delta.
- For consistency, apply the same to the detail views: drop the bare
  attainment_8_score === 0 guard (KS4 keys off isSpecial only); KS2 keeps the
  all-four-subjects-zero placeholder signature.

Special schools / PRUs / AP are still handled via isSpecialSchool everywhere.
tsc clean; 108/108 unit.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-20 21:58:13 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 4.8 ae6ef6860b fix: don't portray special schools as failing the mainstream benchmark
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 46s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
Special schools, PRUs and alternative provision teach pupils with SEND who
sit the same KS2/KS4 assessments but very few reach the mainstream "expected
standard". Their headline attainment is therefore ~0% (or a very low
Attainment 8), and the site was comparing that to the England average and
painting it red — e.g. Greenmead School (a community special school) rendered
as "0.0% — −62 pts below England average" with three 0% red SATs bars. That
portrays a special school as catastrophically failing against a benchmark
that doesn't fit it.

Add a shared `isSpecialSchool()` helper (detects every DfE special-school
establishment type — all contain "special" — plus PRUs / alternative
provision) and drop the mainstream England comparison + "below" framing for
these schools across every surface:

- Detail (primary + secondary): a plain-English context note explaining the
  school is special and why the comparison isn't shown; England-average delta
  chips, "England avg" hints, the SATs national markers, the Attainment-8
  "vs national" bar and the trend chart's England overlay are all suppressed.
  An all-zero placeholder SATs row hides the (empty) subject bar chart and the
  "why is combined lower" bridge.
- Rankings / search rows (primary + secondary): the mainstream RWM / Attainment
  8 stat shows "—" with no "vs national" delta, instead of "0% · −62 vs
  national".
- Compare: special schools' attainment values are dropped (no misleading dot
  at 0% / no "Below England average" chip); progress banding, which IS a fair
  measure for special schools, is kept.

Belt-and-braces zero-guard: a whole-row zero attainment (special or a
suppressed cohort) is also treated as not-comparable, while a legitimate
single 0 (e.g. 0% exceeding at a mainstream school) stays comparable.

Tests: new isSpecialSchool unit tests (every DfE special type matched, no
mainstream false positives); an e2e journey asserts Greenmead shows the
special-school note and no England-average comparison. tsc clean; 108/108 unit.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-20 20:39:16 +01:00
tudor 4e316b4e38 Merge pull request 'fix(detail): label the phase of all-through admissions figures (Batch F review fix)' (#69) from fix/detail-allthrough-admissions-phase into main
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Backend (FastAPI) (push) Successful in 14s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Frontend (Next.js) (push) Successful in 52s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Pipeline (Meltano + dbt + Airflow) (push) Successful in 14s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Deploy to Staging (push) Successful in 0s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / E2E Journeys against Staging (push) Failing after 56s
Reviewed-on: #69
2026-07-20 16:18:44 +00:00
TudorandClaude Opus 4.8 733faefb98 fix(detail): label which phase all-through admissions figures cover (Batch F)
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 11s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 48s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 43s
Final Ofsted/education-expert review of the detail page (Batch F) found one
clarity gap: on an all-through school the Admissions block shows a single
entry point's figures (Hessle's are the Year 7 secondary intake —
admissions.school_phase = "Secondary") but is titled just "Admissions", so a
parent interested in the reception/primary intake could read the Year 7
numbers as the whole school.

Add a phase subtitle for all-through schools ("These figures are for secondary
entry (Year 7)." / "...primary entry (Reception)."). Pure-primary and
pure-secondary pages are unambiguous and unchanged.

Rest of the review verified correct against source payloads: all three Ofsted
regimes (report card / ungraded post-Sept-2024 / carried-forward), England-
average anchoring, gap-honest trend charts (KS2 + KS4), all-through dual-phase
rendering, and the mobile layout.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-20 17:13:37 +01:00
tudor 5e370d09f1 Merge pull request 'fix(detail): render both phases for all-through schools (Batch E)' (#68) from fix/detail-all-through into main
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Backend (FastAPI) (push) Successful in 14s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Frontend (Next.js) (push) Successful in 48s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Pipeline (Meltano + dbt + Airflow) (push) Successful in 14s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Deploy to Staging (push) Successful in 1s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / E2E Journeys against Staging (push) Failing after 56s
Reviewed-on: #68
2026-07-20 12:02:08 +00:00
TudorandClaude Opus 4.8 f6bb037c47 fix(detail): render both phases for all-through schools (Batch E)
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 44s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 57s
Batch E of applying the compare-screen learnings to the school detail page —
all-through handling (point 11).

An all-through school carries both KS2 and KS4 figures in the same yearly
rows, but SchoolDetailView flipped it to isSecondary and rendered GCSE-only,
hiding the entire primary phase (SATs, phonics, KS2 trend). The Results
snapshot already gated its KS2/KS4 blocks purely on data availability, so both
already appeared there — but the section title, the trend chart, phonics, the
nav label and the history table all still assumed a single phase.

- Add an explicit `isAllThrough` flag (+ `showPrimaryContent = isPrimary ||
  isAllThrough`); pure-secondary behaviour is unchanged.
- Hero: an "All-through (primary & secondary)" meta chip for all-ages framing.
- Results section: title "SATs & GCSE Results", a combined subtitle, and
  "Primary — KS2 SATs (Year 6)" / "Secondary — GCSEs (Year 11)" sub-headings
  separating the two blocks.
- Results Over Time: render two stacked PerformanceCharts (KS2 SATs + GCSEs)
  rather than crowding both stages' series — on different scales with
  different gap stories — onto one axis. Each gets its correct England overlay.
- Phonics section + nav item now show for all-through (primary-stage metric).
- History table: an all-through column set covering both phases (RWM, Exceeding,
  Attainment 8, Progress 8, Eng & Maths 4+).
- Nav "Results" label for all-through instead of "GCSEs".

e2e: a new journey asserts an all-through school (Hessle, 137306) shows both
the KS2 and KS4 results and the All-through label, with a data-driven
precondition skip if staging data drifts.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-20 12:53:07 +01:00
tudor 9c93c3d9c2 Merge pull request 'fix(detail): gap-honest year axis on the detail-page trend charts (Batch D)' (#67) from fix/detail-chart-truthfulness into main
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Backend (FastAPI) (push) Successful in 14s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Frontend (Next.js) (push) Successful in 56s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Pipeline (Meltano + dbt + Airflow) (push) Successful in 14s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Deploy to Staging (push) Successful in 0s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / E2E Journeys against Staging (push) Successful in 44s
Reviewed-on: #67
2026-07-20 11:42:48 +00:00
TudorandClaude Opus 4.8 17bd4d5a5e fix(detail): gap-honest year axis on the detail-page trend charts (Batch D)
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 12s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 50s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Failing after 2m38s
Applies the compare screen's chart-truthfulness rules (spec §8.1) to the
school detail page's time-series charts.

PerformanceChart (Results Over Time, both phases):
- Fill every academic year between the first and last data point via the
  shared fillAcademicYears helper, so cancelled/unpublished years (2019/20,
  2020/21, and — for KS2 — 2021/22) render as real gaps instead of
  compressed time. Each series and the England overlay map onto this filled
  axis with null for missing years; spanGaps:false so school lines never
  bridge a gap.
- Replace the primary-only COVID note with a distinct, honest gap caption:
  KS2 names the cancelled tests plus the unpublished 2021/22 school-level
  year; KS4 names the unpublished 2019/20–2020/21 GCSE grading years.
- Mobile x-axis switches to autoSkip so the longer (gap-honest) axis stays
  readable; the broken line still marks a missing year even when its tick
  label is skipped.

AdmissionsTrendChart:
- Same gap-honest axis + spanGaps:false so a missing admissions year is a
  real gap, not compressed time.

Point 12 (definite canvas heights): desktop is already a definite 280px;
fix the secondary detail's mobile .chartContainer, which fixed the outer
box at 220px and double-constrained PerformanceChart's own 220px canvas +
chip strip (clipping the chips onto the plot) — now height:auto to match
the primary view.

SatsChart is out of scope (single-year per-subject CSS bars — no year axis,
no canvas height to constrain).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-20 12:19:37 +01:00
tudor 31ae13451a Merge pull request 'fix(detail): banded admissions + plain-English Progress 8 (Batch C)' (#66) from fix/detail-inclusion-admissions into main
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Backend (FastAPI) (push) Successful in 15s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Frontend (Next.js) (push) Successful in 49s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Pipeline (Meltano + dbt + Airflow) (push) Successful in 14s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Deploy to Staging (push) Successful in 1s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / E2E Journeys against Staging (push) Successful in 42s
Reviewed-on: #66
2026-07-20 11:11:39 +00:00
TudorandClaude Fable 5 4e6be0ce65 fix(detail): banded first-choice interpretation + plain-English P8 absence copy
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 46s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 24s
Batch C (points 7-10):
- Point 7: the admissions section shows the first-choice offer rate but no
  sense of how severe a low rate is. Reuse the compare screen's banded
  summariseAdmissions ('More than half of first choices missed out' etc.)
  as an interpretive line under the tiles. (Selective/faith framing was
  already present via admissionsTag.)
- Point 8: replace the jargon P8-suspended banner ('not used for
  accountability purposes ... treat with caution') with the compare
  screen's plain-English 'no KS2 baseline (COVID)' explanation.
- Points 9 (disadvantaged cohort sizes) and 10 (FSM benchmark) don't apply
  to the detail page: it shows disadvantaged composition, not disadvantaged
  attainment, and no FSM-vs-benchmark comparison — so there's no small-cohort
  caveat or cross-definition fallback to fix here.
- Also fixed a stray lowercase 'national avg' provenance string Batch B
  missed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-20 12:03:23 +01:00
tudor 452ec77449 Merge pull request 'fix(detail): 'England average' provenance labelling (Batch B)' (#65) from fix/detail-provenance-anchoring into main
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Backend (FastAPI) (push) Successful in 13s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Frontend (Next.js) (push) Successful in 48s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Pipeline (Meltano + dbt + Airflow) (push) Successful in 13s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Deploy to Staging (push) Successful in 1s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / E2E Journeys against Staging (push) Successful in 43s
Reviewed-on: #65
2026-07-20 07:52:55 +00:00
tudor aa87fa917d Merge pull request 'fix(detail): Ofsted sentinel codes, sixth form, carried-forward labels (Batch A)' (#64) from fix/detail-ofsted-correctness into main
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Backend (FastAPI) (push) Successful in 14s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Frontend (Next.js) (push) Successful in 49s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Pipeline (Meltano + dbt + Airflow) (push) Successful in 13s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Deploy to Staging (push) Successful in 1s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / E2E Journeys against Staging (push) Successful in 42s
Reviewed-on: #64
2026-07-20 06:21:06 +00:00
TudorandClaude Fable 5 e36125b24a fix(detail): label official DfE figures as 'England average' (provenance)
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m0s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 6s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 11s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 43s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 13s
Batch B (points 5-6): the detail page called every national figure a
'National avg'. All of them come from the official-DfE national-averages
marts (KS2/KS4 headlines), so they are England averages — relabel to
match the compare screen's provenance convention ('England average' for
official figures; the detail page has no computed benchmarks, so no
'state-school average (computed)' label is needed). Point 6 (anchoring
every number) is already satisfied on the detail page via DeltaChip.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-20 07:19:22 +01:00
TudorandClaude Fable 5 fdda52ff0a fix(detail): filter Ofsted sentinel codes, show sixth-form judgement, label carried-forward grades
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 11s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 46s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 1m23s
Batch A of applying compare-screen learnings to the detail page (points 2-3):

- Point 2: the legacy OEIF sub-judgement grid rendered any non-null value
  via OFSTED_LABELS[value], so Ofsted's sentinel code 9 ('not applicable')
  leaked as an undefined label, and the sixth-form judgement was dropped
  entirely. New shared ofstedLegacyAreas() helper returns only real grades
  (1-4) and includes Sixth Form provision. Both detail views + the
  all-same-grade check use it.
- Point 3: the OEIF disclaimer always claimed 'Ofsted no longer makes an
  overall judgement' even when showing a carried-forward grade. It's now
  grade_source-aware and labels carried-forward grades as such, matching
  the compare screen.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-20 07:15:33 +01:00
tudor a2c63b3cda Merge pull request 'fix(list/map): report-card schools badged as Report Card, not their old grade' (#63) from fix/list-map-report-card-signal into main
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Backend (FastAPI) (push) Successful in 21s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Frontend (Next.js) (push) Successful in 54s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Pipeline (Meltano + dbt + Airflow) (push) Successful in 13s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Deploy to Staging (push) Successful in 1s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / E2E Journeys against Staging (push) Successful in 41s
Reviewed-on: #63
2026-07-18 20:28:19 +00:00
TudorandClaude Fable 5 b2b2cad5ac test/docs: harden report-card list e2e + correct badge docstring
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 6s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 17s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 48s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 9s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Failing after 1m4s
Review fixes on the list/map report-card PR:
- e2e precondition now hard-asserts ofsted_rc_date instead of test.skip, so
  the backend dropping the field fails loudly (that's the regression under
  test), not silently skips.
- Use page_size=5 (the real backend param); per_page was ignored and fell
  back to the default page size.
- Update buildOfstedListBadge docstring to describe the ofsted_rc_date-based,
  report-card-wins-first detection instead of the removed framework check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-18 21:24:09 +01:00
TudorandClaude Fable 5 5ec4f3f7cd fix(list/map): badge report-card schools as Report Card, not their carried-forward grade
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 17s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 47s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 2m48s
The search-result cards and map pins keyed report-card detection off
ofsted_framework === 'ReportCard', but the API sets ofsted_framework to the
raw event grouping ('Schools - S5'); worse, ofsted_grade (the carried-forward
legacy grade) was checked first and won. So report-card schools were badged
by their old grade — Barclay's pin/card read 'Outstanding · 2021' instead of
'Report Card · 2026'. Same root cause as the detail-page fix, different
surface.

Expose ofsted_rc_date on the list serialization (the report-card inspection
date, non-null only for report cards) and make both badge builders treat a
present rc-date as winning over any grade, using its year. Removes the dead
framework === 'ReportCard' branches.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-18 21:14:57 +01:00
tudor 74bdbebd57 Merge pull request 'fix(detail): render & correctly date Ofsted report cards' (#62) from fix/detail-report-card-render-date into main
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Backend (FastAPI) (push) Successful in 14s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Frontend (Next.js) (push) Successful in 54s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Pipeline (Meltano + dbt + Airflow) (push) Successful in 13s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Deploy to Staging (push) Successful in 19s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / E2E Journeys against Staging (push) Successful in 40s
Reviewed-on: #62
2026-07-18 18:13:25 +00:00
TudorandClaude Fable 5 b31e71ac88 fix(detail): render report cards and date them by the report-card inspection
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m4s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 11s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 55s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
The detail views detected report cards via ofsted.framework === 'ReportCard',
but the API sets framework to the raw event grouping ('Schools - S5') even
for report-card schools — so the check never matched: report-card schools
rendered as legacy 'Ofsted Rating' badges dated to a pre-Nov-2025
inspection (e.g. Barclay shown as 'Outstanding, Inspected 7 October 2021'
instead of its Feb 2026 report card).

Detect report cards by the presence of the report_card object (matching
the compare screen), and date them with rc_inspection_date, never the
legacy inspection_date. Applies to both primary and secondary detail views.
New e2e assertion against a real report-card school gates it.

Note: the list/map surface has the same latent issue via ofsted_framework
(LeafletMapInner) — flagged as a separate follow-up.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-18 19:09:16 +01:00
tudor b05f3bebc7 Merge pull request 'fix(ci): promotion E2E-gate check uses Actions token, not REGISTRY_TOKEN (403)' (#61) from fix/promote-status-token into main
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Backend (FastAPI) (push) Successful in 14s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Frontend (Next.js) (push) Successful in 54s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Pipeline (Meltano + dbt + Airflow) (push) Successful in 12s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Deploy to Staging (push) Successful in 1s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / E2E Journeys against Staging (push) Successful in 44s
Reviewed-on: #61
2026-07-18 15:25:28 +00:00
TudorandClaude Fable 5 ce422e6436 fix(ci): use the Actions token, not REGISTRY_TOKEN, to read the E2E commit status
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 11s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 47s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 36s
Promotion's 'Verify the staging E2E gate' step called the Gitea
commit-status API with REGISTRY_TOKEN, which has container-registry scope
but no repository scope — so the API returned 403 and promotion failed.
Switch to the built-in GITHUB_TOKEN (repo read scope), matching how
pr-checks.yml already authenticates to the Gitea API. REGISTRY_TOKEN is
still used for the docker registry login, which is its correct scope.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-18 16:20:03 +01:00
tudor 2ac26acf91 Merge pull request 'style(compare): shorten Ofsted link text to 'Ofsted page'' (#60) from fix/ofsted-link-text into main
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Backend (FastAPI) (push) Successful in 13s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Frontend (Next.js) (push) Successful in 52s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Pipeline (Meltano + dbt + Airflow) (push) Successful in 13s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Deploy to Staging (push) Successful in 0s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / E2E Journeys against Staging (push) Successful in 41s
Reviewed-on: #60
2026-07-18 14:20:09 +00:00
TudorandClaude Fable 5 3e77057567 style(compare): shorten Ofsted link text to 'Ofsted page'
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 45s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 9s
The link repeated the full school name ('Watford Grammar School for Boys's
Ofsted page') — long on mobile, and the colour-coded school name already
leads the row. Show just 'Ofsted page →'; keep the full name in aria-label
so screen readers can still tell the per-school links apart.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-18 15:19:41 +01:00
tudor e0d5a9969e Merge pull request 'style(compare): enlarge per-school name label in mobile section cards' (#59) from fix/mobile-cell-name-size into main
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Backend (FastAPI) (push) Successful in 14s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Frontend (Next.js) (push) Successful in 49s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Pipeline (Meltano + dbt + Airflow) (push) Successful in 14s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Deploy to Staging (push) Successful in 1s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / E2E Journeys against Staging (push) Successful in 41s
Reviewed-on: #59
2026-07-18 14:09:02 +00:00
TudorandClaude Fable 5 dc21e80a5e style(compare): enlarge the per-school name label in mobile section cards
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m4s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 11s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 47s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 14s
The colour-coded school name that leads each row in a mobile measure card
was 0.8rem — a touch small to scan which school a value belongs to. Bump
to 0.9rem (with a matching 10px dot) so it's easier to read. Mobile only;
desktop uses the column header and hides this label.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-18 15:06:18 +01:00
tudor 6d3a203699 Merge pull request 'fix(compare): anchor grade-5 & EBacc rows; restore secondary-button outline' (#58) from fix/secondary-anchors-button-affordance into main
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Backend (FastAPI) (push) Successful in 14s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Frontend (Next.js) (push) Successful in 53s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Build Pipeline (Meltano + dbt + Airflow) (push) Successful in 13s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / Deploy to Staging (push) Successful in 0s
Stage (build -> staging -> E2E gate) / E2E Journeys against Staging (push) Successful in 40s
Reviewed-on: #58
2026-07-18 07:29:51 +00:00
22 changed files with 874 additions and 199 deletions
+4 -1
View File
@@ -67,9 +67,12 @@ jobs:
echo "Promoting $FULL_SHA (images tagged $SHORT_SHA)"
- name: Verify the staging E2E gate passed for this commit
# Use the built-in Actions token (GITHUB_TOKEN is the documented name;
# it carries repository read scope), NOT REGISTRY_TOKEN — the registry
# token has no repo scope, so the commit-status API returns 403.
run: |
STATUS_JSON=$(curl -fsS \
-H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.REGISTRY_TOKEN }}" \
-H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" \
"https://${REGISTRY}/api/v1/repos/${{ gitea.repository }}/commits/${{ steps.resolve.outputs.full }}/status")
echo "$STATUS_JSON" | python3 -c "
import json, sys
+7 -1
View File
@@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ _MAIN_QUERY = text("""
foi.ofsted_grade,
foi.ofsted_date,
foi.ofsted_framework,
foi.ofsted_rc_date,
l.local_authority_name AS local_authority,
l.local_authority_code,
l.address_line1 AS address1,
@@ -256,7 +257,12 @@ _MAIN_QUERY = text("""
-- Fall back to the ungraded-inspection grade when no graded grade exists.
COALESCE(overall_effectiveness, ungraded_grade) AS ofsted_grade,
inspection_date AS ofsted_date,
framework AS ofsted_framework
framework AS ofsted_framework,
-- Report-card signal for list/map badges: non-null only when the
-- latest inspection carries report-card grades. framework is the
-- raw event grouping ("Schools - S5"), never "ReportCard", so it
-- can't be used to detect report cards.
rc_inspection_date AS ofsted_rc_date
FROM marts.fact_ofsted_inspection
ORDER BY urn, inspection_date DESC NULLS LAST
) foi ON s.urn = foi.urn
+1
View File
@@ -550,6 +550,7 @@ SCHOOL_COLUMNS = [
"ofsted_grade",
"ofsted_date",
"ofsted_framework",
"ofsted_rc_date",
"latitude",
"longitude",
]
+107
View File
@@ -80,6 +80,33 @@ test('searching by postcode returns nearby schools', async ({ page }) => {
await expect(schoolLinks(page).first()).toBeVisible({ timeout: 15_000 });
});
test('a report-card school shows a Report Card badge in search results, not its old grade', async ({ page }) => {
// List/map badges keyed off ofsted_grade (the carried-forward legacy grade)
// and never reached the report-card branch, so report-card schools were
// labelled by their old grade (e.g. "Outstanding · 2021"). The list now
// carries ofsted_rc_date and the badge treats a report card as winning.
const RC_URN = 138690; // Barclay Primary — has a Nov-2025+ report card
const res = await page.request.get(`/api/schools?search=Barclay%20Primary&page_size=5`);
expect(res.ok()).toBeTruthy();
const barclay = ((await res.json()).schools ?? []).find(
(s: { urn: number }) => s.urn === RC_URN,
);
// Hard assertions, not test.skip: if the backend stops exposing
// ofsted_rc_date for this report-card school, that IS the regression this
// test exists to catch, so it must fail loudly rather than skip.
expect(barclay, 'Barclay must appear in the search results').toBeTruthy();
expect(
barclay.ofsted_rc_date,
'the list must expose ofsted_rc_date for a report-card school',
).toBeTruthy();
await searchByName(page, 'Barclay Primary');
// The Barclay row must be present…
await expect(page.locator(`a[href*="${RC_URN}"]`).first()).toBeVisible({ timeout: 15_000 });
// …badged as a Report Card, not its carried-forward "Outstanding" grade.
await expect(page.getByText(/Report Card ·/).first()).toBeVisible();
});
test('school detail page renders name and performance data', async ({ page }) => {
await searchByName(page, 'primary');
const firstSchool = schoolLinks(page).first();
@@ -94,6 +121,86 @@ test('school detail page renders name and performance data', async ({ page }) =>
await expect(page.locator('canvas:visible').first()).toBeVisible({ timeout: 15_000 });
});
test('a report-card school shows its report card, dated to the report-card inspection', async ({ page }) => {
// Detail views detected report cards via `framework`, which the API never
// sets to "ReportCard" — so report-card schools rendered as legacy ratings
// dated to a pre-Nov-2025 inspection. Detection now keys off the report_card
// object and dates it with rc_inspection_date.
const RC_URN = 138690; // Barclay Primary — has a Nov-2025+ report card
const res = await page.request.get(`/api/schools/${RC_URN}`);
expect(res.ok()).toBeTruthy();
const ofsted = (await res.json()).ofsted;
test.skip(
!ofsted?.report_card || Object.keys(ofsted.report_card).length === 0,
'precondition: chosen URN must currently have a report card',
);
const rcYear = new Date(ofsted.rc_inspection_date).getFullYear();
const legacyYear = new Date(ofsted.inspection_date).getFullYear();
await page.goto(`/school/${RC_URN}`);
const ofstedSection = page.locator('#ofsted');
// Detection fixed: rendered as a Report Card, not a legacy "Ofsted Rating".
await expect(ofstedSection.getByText('Ofsted Report Card')).toBeVisible({ timeout: 15_000 });
// Dating fixed: dated to the report-card inspection, never the legacy one.
await expect(ofstedSection.getByText(new RegExp(`Inspected .*${rcYear}`))).toBeVisible();
if (legacyYear !== rcYear) {
await expect(ofstedSection.getByText(new RegExp(`Inspected .*${legacyYear}`))).toHaveCount(0);
}
});
test('an all-through school shows BOTH its KS2 SATs and its GCSE results, not just one phase', async ({ page }) => {
// All-through schools carry both KS2 and KS4 data in the same yearly rows.
// The detail view used to flip them to isSecondary and render GCSE-only,
// hiding the primary phase. It now renders both phases and labels the school
// "All-through".
const AT_URN = 137306; // Hessle High School and Penshurst Primary — all-through
const res = await page.request.get(`/api/schools/${AT_URN}`);
expect(res.ok()).toBeTruthy();
const detail = await res.json();
const rows: Array<{ rwm_expected_pct: number | null; attainment_8_score: number | null }> =
detail.yearly_data ?? [];
const hasKS2 = rows.some((r) => r.rwm_expected_pct != null);
const hasKS4 = rows.some((r) => r.attainment_8_score != null);
test.skip(
(detail.school_info?.phase ?? '').toLowerCase() !== 'all-through' || !hasKS2 || !hasKS4,
'precondition: chosen URN must currently be all-through with both KS2 and KS4 results',
);
await page.goto(`/school/${AT_URN}`);
await expect(page.locator('h1').first()).toBeVisible({ timeout: 15_000 });
// Labelled as all-through in the hero meta.
await expect(page.getByText(/All-through/i).first()).toBeVisible();
// The combined results section carries both phases.
const results = page.locator('#results');
await expect(results.getByText(/SATs & GCSE Results/)).toBeVisible();
await expect(results.getByRole('heading', { name: /Primary.*KS2 SATs/ })).toBeVisible(); // KS2 block
await expect(results.getByRole('heading', { name: /Secondary.*GCSEs/ })).toBeVisible(); // KS4 block
});
test('a special school is not shown as failing against the mainstream England average', async ({ page }) => {
// Special schools sit the same tests but very few pupils reach the mainstream
// "expected standard", so a "0.0% · 62 pts below England average" rendering
// portrays them as failing against a benchmark that doesn't fit. The results
// section drops the England comparison and explains the context instead.
const SP_URN = 101099; // Greenmead School — a community special school
const res = await page.request.get(`/api/schools/${SP_URN}`);
expect(res.ok()).toBeTruthy();
const detail = await res.json();
test.skip(
!/special|pupil referral|alternative provision/i.test(detail.school_info?.school_type ?? ''),
'precondition: chosen URN must currently be a special school',
);
await page.goto(`/school/${SP_URN}`);
const results = page.locator('#results');
// The special-school context note is shown…
await expect(results.getByText(/This is a special school/i)).toBeVisible({ timeout: 15_000 });
// …and the mainstream England-average comparison is dropped entirely.
await expect(results.getByText(/England avg/i)).toHaveCount(0);
});
test('school with no performance data still gets a working detail page', async ({ page }) => {
// Schools without KS2/KS4 results (special post-16 institutions, sixth-form
// centres, PRUs) used to 500 in the API — NaN GIAS fields broke JSON
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
/**
* SpecialSchoolNote Component Tests
*/
import '@testing-library/jest-dom';
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import { SpecialSchoolNote } from '@/components/SpecialSchoolNote';
describe('SpecialSchoolNote', () => {
it('renders nothing for a mainstream school', () => {
const { container } = render(<SpecialSchoolNote school={{ school_type: 'Academy converter' }} />);
expect(container).toBeEmptyDOMElement();
});
it('describes a special school as teaching pupils with SEND', () => {
render(<SpecialSchoolNote school={{ school_type: 'Community special school' }} />);
expect(screen.getByText(/This is a special school/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByText(/special educational needs/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});
it('does NOT call PRU pupils SEND — they are educated outside a mainstream school', () => {
render(<SpecialSchoolNote school={{ school_type: 'Pupil referral unit' }} />);
expect(screen.getByText(/This is a pupil referral unit/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByText(/educated outside a mainstream school/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.queryByText(/special educational needs/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});
it('does NOT call alternative-provision pupils SEND', () => {
render(<SpecialSchoolNote school={{ school_type: 'Academy alternative provision converter' }} />);
expect(screen.getByText(/This is an alternative provision setting/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.queryByText(/special educational needs/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});
});
+85 -3
View File
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ import {
isValidPostcode,
debounce,
buildOfstedListBadge,
ofstedLegacyAreas,
metricKind,
shortName,
computeYBounds,
@@ -111,6 +112,35 @@ describe('debounce', () => {
});
});
describe('ofstedLegacyAreas', () => {
it('returns only real grades (1-4) and drops sentinel/null values', () => {
const areas = ofstedLegacyAreas({
quality_of_education: 1,
behaviour_attitudes: 2,
personal_development: null,
leadership_management: 9, // sentinel "not applicable" — must be dropped
early_years_provision: 9, // secondary school — not applicable
sixth_form_provision: 2,
});
expect(areas.map((a) => a.label)).toEqual([
'Quality of Teaching',
'Behaviour in School',
'Sixth Form',
]);
expect(areas.every((a) => a.value >= 1 && a.value <= 4)).toBe(true);
});
it('includes the sixth-form judgement where present (was previously dropped)', () => {
const areas = ofstedLegacyAreas({ sixth_form_provision: 1 });
expect(areas).toEqual([{ label: 'Sixth Form', value: 1 }]);
});
it('includes Early Years for a primary school', () => {
const areas = ofstedLegacyAreas({ quality_of_education: 2, early_years_provision: 1 });
expect(areas.map((a) => a.label)).toContain('Early Years (Reception)');
});
});
describe('buildOfstedListBadge', () => {
it('returns grade word + year for OEIF Outstanding', () => {
const badge = buildOfstedListBadge({ ofsted_grade: 1, ofsted_date: '2023-11-15', ofsted_framework: 'OEIF' });
@@ -130,9 +160,23 @@ describe('buildOfstedListBadge', () => {
expect(badge.cssClass).toBe('ofsted2');
});
it('returns Report Card badge when framework is ReportCard', () => {
const badge = buildOfstedListBadge({ ofsted_grade: null, ofsted_date: '2025-11-01', ofsted_framework: 'ReportCard' });
expect(badge.label).toBe('Report Card · 2025');
it('returns a Report Card badge when ofsted_rc_date is present', () => {
const badge = buildOfstedListBadge({ ofsted_grade: null, ofsted_rc_date: '2026-02-03' });
expect(badge.label).toBe('Report Card · 2026');
expect(badge.cssClass).toBe('ofstedRc');
});
it('a report card wins over a carried-forward legacy grade', () => {
// The production bug: a report-card school (e.g. Barclay) also carries a
// carried-forward legacy grade (ofsted_grade), which used to win and label
// the pin "Outstanding · 2021" instead of "Report Card · 2026".
const badge = buildOfstedListBadge({
ofsted_grade: 1,
ofsted_date: '2021-10-07',
ofsted_framework: 'Schools - S5',
ofsted_rc_date: '2026-02-03',
});
expect(badge.label).toBe('Report Card · 2026');
expect(badge.cssClass).toBe('ofstedRc');
});
@@ -225,6 +269,44 @@ describe('isProposedToClose', () => {
});
});
describe('isSpecialSchool', () => {
const { isSpecialSchool } = require('@/lib/utils');
it('matches every DfE special-school establishment type', () => {
for (const t of [
'Community special school',
'Foundation special school',
'Academy special converter',
'Academy special sponsor led',
'Non-maintained special school',
'Free schools special',
'Other independent special school',
]) {
expect(isSpecialSchool({ school_type: t })).toBe(true);
}
});
it('matches pupil referral units and alternative provision', () => {
expect(isSpecialSchool({ school_type: 'Pupil referral unit' })).toBe(true);
expect(isSpecialSchool({ school_type: 'Academy alternative provision converter' })).toBe(true);
});
it('does not match mainstream types (no false positives)', () => {
for (const t of [
'Academy converter',
'Community school',
'Voluntary aided school',
'Free schools',
'University technical college',
'Other independent school',
null,
undefined,
]) {
expect(isSpecialSchool({ school_type: t })).toBe(false);
}
});
});
describe('shortName', () => {
it('drops the trailing establishment-type words', () => {
expect(shortName('Barclay Primary School')).toBe('Barclay');
+18 -7
View File
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ import { Line } from 'react-chartjs-2';
import { ChartOptions } from 'chart.js';
import '@/lib/chartSetup';
import { formatAcademicYear } from '@/lib/utils';
import { fillAcademicYears } from '@/lib/compareChartData';
import type { SchoolAdmissions } from '@/lib/types';
import styles from './AdmissionsTrendChart.module.css';
@@ -17,13 +18,22 @@ export default function AdmissionsTrendChart({ history }: { history: SchoolAdmis
const pts = history.filter((h) => h.first_preference_offer_pct != null);
if (pts.length < 2) return null;
const labels = pts.map((p) => formatAcademicYear(p.year));
const values = pts.map((p) => p.first_preference_offer_pct as number);
const lastIdx = pts.length - 1;
// Gap-honest axis: every academic year between the first and last data point
// appears, so a missing admissions year renders as a real gap (spanGaps:false)
// rather than compressing time between distant years.
const axisYears = fillAcademicYears(pts.map((p) => p.year));
const byYear = new Map(pts.map((p) => [p.year, p.first_preference_offer_pct as number]));
const labels = axisYears.map(formatAcademicYear);
const values: (number | null)[] = axisYears.map((y) => byYear.get(y) ?? null);
const present = values
.map((v, i) => (v != null ? i : -1))
.filter((i) => i >= 0);
const lastIdx = present[present.length - 1];
// Auto-scale with headroom so variation is visible, clamped to 0100.
const lo = Math.min(...values);
const hi = Math.max(...values);
const numeric = values.filter((v): v is number => v != null);
const lo = Math.min(...numeric);
const hi = Math.max(...numeric);
const padded = Math.max(5, Math.round((hi - lo) * 0.25));
const yMin = Math.max(0, Math.floor((lo - padded) / 5) * 5);
const yMax = Math.min(100, Math.ceil((hi + padded) / 5) * 5);
@@ -69,15 +79,16 @@ export default function AdmissionsTrendChart({ history }: { history: SchoolAdmis
label: 'First-choice offer rate',
data: values,
clip: false as const,
spanGaps: false,
borderColor: '#e07256',
backgroundColor: 'rgba(224,114,86,0.10)',
borderWidth: 2.5,
tension: 0.3,
fill: true,
pointRadius: pts.map((_, i) => (i === lastIdx ? 5 : 3)),
pointRadius: values.map((_, i) => (i === lastIdx ? 5 : 3)),
pointBackgroundColor: '#e07256',
pointBorderColor: '#fff',
pointBorderWidth: pts.map((_, i) => (i === lastIdx ? 2 : 0)),
pointBorderWidth: values.map((_, i) => (i === lastIdx ? 2 : 0)),
pointHoverRadius: 6,
},
],
+7 -3
View File
@@ -43,6 +43,13 @@ interface PopupBadge {
}
function buildPopupBadge(school: School): PopupBadge {
// A report card wins over any carried-forward legacy grade — its presence is
// signalled by ofsted_rc_date (the list has no full report_card object, and
// ofsted_framework is the raw event grouping, never "ReportCard").
if (school.ofsted_rc_date) {
const rcYear = new Date(school.ofsted_rc_date).getFullYear();
return { label: `Report Card · ${rcYear}`, style: 'background:#5a3a6e;color:#fff' };
}
const year = school.ofsted_date ? new Date(school.ofsted_date).getFullYear() : null;
const yearStr = year ? ` · ${year}` : '';
if (school.ofsted_grade) {
@@ -55,9 +62,6 @@ function buildPopupBadge(school: School): PopupBadge {
};
return { label: `${labels[school.ofsted_grade]}${yearStr}`, style: colours[school.ofsted_grade] };
}
if (school.ofsted_framework === 'ReportCard') {
return { label: `Report Card${yearStr}`, style: 'background:#5a3a6e;color:#fff' };
}
return { label: 'Not yet inspected', style: 'background:#e0e0e0;color:#666' };
}
+44 -23
View File
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ import { ChartOptions, ChartDataset } from 'chart.js';
import '@/lib/chartSetup';
import type { SchoolResult } from '@/lib/types';
import { formatAcademicYear } from '@/lib/utils';
import { fillAcademicYears } from '@/lib/compareChartData';
import { useIsMobile } from '@/hooks/useIsMobile';
import { track } from '@/lib/analytics';
import styles from './PerformanceChart.module.css';
@@ -35,8 +36,6 @@ interface PerformanceChartProps {
nationalByYear?: NationalByYear[];
}
const COVID_YEARS = new Set([201920, 202021]);
// Mobile chip definitions: which datasets render when each chip is active.
// `series` keys reference the dataset labels so we can filter cleanly.
type ChipId = 'expected' | 'higher' | 'progress' | 'attainment8' | 'em_pass' | 'progress8';
@@ -67,21 +66,33 @@ export function PerformanceChart({
nationalByYear,
}: PerformanceChartProps) {
const sortedData = [...data].sort((a, b) => a.year - b.year);
const years = sortedData.map(d => formatAcademicYear(d.year));
// Gap-honest year axis: every academic year between the first and last data
// point appears, so cancelled/unpublished years (2019/20, 2020/21, and — for
// KS2 — 2021/22) render as real gaps rather than compressed time. School
// lines never bridge these gaps (spanGaps:false below).
const axisYears = fillAcademicYears(sortedData.map(d => d.year));
const byYear = new Map(sortedData.map(d => [d.year, d]));
const col = (key: keyof SchoolResult): (number | null)[] =>
axisYears.map(y => {
const v = byYear.get(y)?.[key];
return typeof v === 'number' ? v : null;
});
const years = axisYears.map(formatAcademicYear);
const isMobile = useIsMobile();
// ── Build per-year national averages ─────────────────────────────────
const natRefRwm: (number | null)[] = sortedData.map(d => {
// ── Build per-year national averages (aligned to the filled axis) ────
const natRefRwm: (number | null)[] = axisYears.map(y => {
if (nationalByYear) {
const match = nationalByYear.find(n => n.year === d.year);
const match = nationalByYear.find(n => n.year === y);
return match?.primary?.rwm_expected_pct ?? null;
}
return nationalRwmAvg ?? null;
});
const natRefAtt8: (number | null)[] = sortedData.map(d => {
const natRefAtt8: (number | null)[] = axisYears.map(y => {
if (nationalByYear) {
const match = nationalByYear.find(n => n.year === d.year);
const match = nationalByYear.find(n => n.year === y);
return match?.secondary?.attainment_8_score ?? null;
}
return nationalAtt8Avg ?? null;
@@ -107,10 +118,11 @@ export function PerformanceChart({
return `${arrow} Reading, Writing & Maths peaked at ${bestPct}% (${formatAcademicYear(best.year)}), currently ${latestPct}%`;
})();
const hasCovidGap = isSecondary
? false
: COVID_YEARS.size > 0 &&
[...COVID_YEARS].some(y => !sortedData.find(d => d.year === y));
// A gap year is any filled axis year the school has no results row for —
// exactly the cancelled/unpublished years the fill introduced. Drives the
// honest note below (KS2 and KS4 have different gap stories).
const gapYears = axisYears.filter(y => !byYear.has(y));
const hasGap = gapYears.length > 0;
// ── Datasets (full set; mobile filters them via the active chip) ─────
const refLineStyle = {
@@ -120,13 +132,14 @@ export function PerformanceChart({
borderDash: [6, 4] as number[],
pointRadius: 0,
tension: 0,
spanGaps: false as const,
order: 10,
};
const allDatasets: ChartDataset<'line'>[] = isSecondary ? [
{
label: 'Attainment 8',
data: sortedData.map(d => d.attainment_8_score),
data: col('attainment_8_score'),
borderColor: '#2d7d7d',
backgroundColor: 'rgba(45,125,125,0.08)',
borderWidth: 2.5,
@@ -137,7 +150,7 @@ export function PerformanceChart({
},
{
label: 'English & Maths Grade 4+',
data: sortedData.map(d => d.english_maths_standard_pass_pct),
data: col('english_maths_standard_pass_pct'),
borderColor: '#c9a227',
backgroundColor: 'rgba(201,162,39,0.08)',
borderWidth: 1.5,
@@ -147,7 +160,7 @@ export function PerformanceChart({
},
{
label: 'Progress 8',
data: sortedData.map(d => d.progress_8_score),
data: col('progress_8_score'),
borderColor: 'rgb(139,92,246)',
backgroundColor: 'rgba(139,92,246,0.08)',
borderWidth: 1.5,
@@ -165,7 +178,7 @@ export function PerformanceChart({
] : [
{
label: 'Reading, Writing & Maths expected %',
data: sortedData.map(d => d.rwm_expected_pct),
data: col('rwm_expected_pct'),
borderColor: '#2d7d7d',
backgroundColor: 'rgba(45,125,125,0.08)',
borderWidth: 2.5,
@@ -176,7 +189,7 @@ export function PerformanceChart({
},
{
label: 'Exceeding expected level',
data: sortedData.map(d => d.rwm_high_pct),
data: col('rwm_high_pct'),
borderColor: '#c9a227',
backgroundColor: 'rgba(201,162,39,0.08)',
borderWidth: 1.5,
@@ -192,7 +205,7 @@ export function PerformanceChart({
} as ChartDataset<'line'>] : []),
{
label: 'Reading progress',
data: sortedData.map(d => d.reading_progress),
data: col('reading_progress'),
borderColor: 'rgb(59,130,246)',
backgroundColor: 'rgba(59,130,246,0.08)',
borderWidth: 1.5,
@@ -203,7 +216,7 @@ export function PerformanceChart({
},
{
label: 'Writing progress',
data: sortedData.map(d => d.writing_progress),
data: col('writing_progress'),
borderColor: 'rgb(139,92,246)',
backgroundColor: 'rgba(139,92,246,0.08)',
borderWidth: 1.5,
@@ -214,7 +227,7 @@ export function PerformanceChart({
},
{
label: 'Maths progress',
data: sortedData.map(d => d.maths_progress),
data: col('maths_progress'),
borderColor: 'rgb(236,72,153)',
backgroundColor: 'rgba(236,72,153,0.08)',
borderWidth: 1.5,
@@ -275,6 +288,8 @@ export function PerformanceChart({
responsive: true,
maintainAspectRatio: false,
interaction: { mode: 'index', intersect: false },
// Never bridge missing years — cancelled/unpublished years are real gaps.
datasets: { line: { spanGaps: false } },
plugins: {
legend: {
position: 'top',
@@ -326,6 +341,7 @@ export function PerformanceChart({
responsive: true,
maintainAspectRatio: false,
interaction: { mode: 'index', intersect: false },
datasets: { line: { spanGaps: false } },
plugins: {
legend: { display: false },
title: { display: false },
@@ -353,7 +369,10 @@ export function PerformanceChart({
},
x: {
grid: { display: false },
ticks: { font: { size: 10 }, autoSkip: false },
// With the gap-honest axis (more year labels) autoSkip keeps the
// phone axis readable; the broken line still shows where a year is
// missing even when its tick label is skipped.
ticks: { font: { size: 10 }, autoSkip: true, maxTicksLimit: 5, maxRotation: 0 },
},
},
};
@@ -416,9 +435,11 @@ export function PerformanceChart({
</div>
)}
{hasCovidGap && (
{hasGap && (
<p className={styles.covidNote}>
* No data for 2019/20 or 2020/21 national assessments were cancelled due to COVID-19.
{isSecondary
? "School-level GCSE figures for 2019/20 and 2020/21 weren't published (COVID grading) where the line breaks — the England average is shown where available."
: "No national tests were held in 2019/20 and 2020/21 (COVID), and DfE didn't publish school-level figures for 2021/22 — the England average is shown for those years where available."}
</p>
)}
@@ -1040,6 +1040,41 @@
color: var(--accent-coral-dark, #b04a2e);
}
/* ── Ofsted grade grids (Report Card + OEIF) ──
Uniform, vertically-aligned grade chips. Labels reserve two lines so
single- and double-line labels put their chips on the same baseline;
every chip (Met, Strong, Expected standard, …) shares one font size,
padding and min-height regardless of how many lines its text wraps to. */
.gradeGrid .metricCard {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
gap: 0.5rem;
padding: 0.85rem 0.75rem;
}
.gradeGrid .metricLabel {
min-height: 2.6em;
margin: 0;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
text-align: center;
}
.gradeGrid .metricValue {
margin-top: auto;
display: inline-flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
max-width: 100%;
min-height: 2.6em;
padding: 0.3rem 0.7rem;
border-radius: 5px;
font-size: 1rem;
font-weight: 700;
line-height: 1.25;
text-align: center;
}
.ofstedDisclaimer {
font-size: 0.8rem;
color: var(--text-muted, #8a847a);
+192 -64
View File
@@ -18,9 +18,11 @@ import type {
SchoolDeprivation, SchoolFinance, NationalAverages,
} from '@/lib/types';
import {
formatPercentage, formatProgress, formatAcademicYear, isProposedToClose,
formatPercentage, formatProgress, formatAcademicYear, isProposedToClose, ofstedLegacyAreas, isSpecialSchool,
} from '@/lib/utils';
import { DeltaChip } from './DeltaChip';
import { SpecialSchoolNote } from './SpecialSchoolNote';
import { summariseAdmissions } from '@/lib/compareLogic';
const PerformanceChart = dynamic(
() => import('./PerformanceChart').then((m) => m.PerformanceChart),
@@ -85,6 +87,10 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
// Trend toggle only appears with ≥2 years carrying an offer rate.
const admissionsOfferYears = admissionsHistory.filter((h) => h.first_preference_offer_pct != null).length;
const showAdmissionsTrend = admissionsOfferYears >= 2;
// Banded interpretation of the first-choice offer rate ("More than half of
// first choices missed out" etc.) — the same banding the compare screen
// uses, so a low offer rate reads as how severe it actually is.
const admissionsSummary = summariseAdmissions(admissions);
// Only the section links scroll horizontally; Back and "All" stay pinned.
const sectionLinksRef = useRef<HTMLDivElement | null>(null);
const [sectionNavAtEnd, setSectionNavAtEnd] = useState(false);
@@ -153,10 +159,16 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
const latestResults = yearlyData.length > 0 ? yearlyData[yearlyData.length - 1] : null;
// Phase detection
// Phase detection. All-through schools cover BOTH key stages, so they are
// neither "pure primary" nor "pure secondary": isSecondary stays true (they
// have KS4 data) but isAllThrough gates the primary-only content (phonics,
// KS2 trend) back on and switches phase-specific copy to an all-ages framing.
const phase = schoolInfo.phase ?? '';
const isSecondary = phase.toLowerCase().includes('secondary') || phase.toLowerCase() === 'all-through';
const isAllThrough = phase.toLowerCase() === 'all-through';
const isSecondary = phase.toLowerCase().includes('secondary') || isAllThrough;
const isPrimary = !isSecondary;
// Primary-stage content shows for pure-primary AND all-through schools.
const showPrimaryContent = isPrimary || isAllThrough;
// National averages (fetched dynamically so they stay current)
const [nationalAvg, setNationalAvg] = useState<NationalAverages | null>(null);
@@ -222,17 +234,38 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
const hasKS4Results = latestResults != null && latestResults.attainment_8_score != null;
const hasAnyResults = hasKS2Results || hasKS4Results;
// Special schools / PRUs / AP: their pupils sit the same tests but very few
// reach the mainstream "expected standard", so a 0% headline and an England
// comparison portray them as failing against a benchmark that doesn't fit.
const isSpecial = isSpecialSchool(schoolInfo);
// Belt-and-braces for KS2: a whole-row zero attainment (every subject 0 — a
// special/suppressed signature) is a placeholder, not a real result. This
// needs ALL of RWM + reading + writing + maths to be 0, so a genuine 0%
// combined (some pupils met individual subjects but not all three) stays
// comparable. Attainment 8 is a single 080 score with no subject breakdown
// to form such a signature, so KS4 keys off establishment type only — a
// genuine (if extreme) 0.0 still shows its real figure and comparison.
const ks2Placeholder = latestResults != null
&& latestResults.rwm_expected_pct === 0
&& (latestResults.reading_expected_pct ?? 0) === 0
&& (latestResults.writing_expected_pct ?? 0) === 0
&& (latestResults.maths_expected_pct ?? 0) === 0;
// Whether to drop the England-average deltas / national markers / "below"
// framing on the attainment measures.
const suppressKs2Comparison = isSpecial || ks2Placeholder;
const suppressKs4Comparison = isSpecial;
// Build section nav items dynamically — only sections with data.
// Order is engagement-led (from section_nav_used analytics): the most-sought
// sections — results, admissions, inclusion, history — sit near the top,
// after the recognised Ofsted badge; low-demand context sections stay last.
const navItems: { id: string; label: string }[] = [];
if (ofsted) navItems.push({ id: 'ofsted', label: 'Ofsted' });
if (hasAnyResults) navItems.push({ id: 'results', label: isSecondary ? 'GCSEs' : 'SATs' });
if (hasAnyResults) navItems.push({ id: 'results', label: isAllThrough ? 'Results' : isSecondary ? 'GCSEs' : 'SATs' });
if (admissions) navItems.push({ id: 'admissions', label: 'Admissions' });
if (hasInclusionData) navItems.push({ id: 'inclusion', label: 'Pupils' });
if (yearlyData.length > 0) navItems.push({ id: 'history', label: 'History' });
if (hasPhonics && isPrimary) navItems.push({ id: 'phonics', label: 'Phonics' });
if (hasPhonics && showPrimaryContent) navItems.push({ id: 'phonics', label: 'Phonics' });
if (hasSchoolLife) navItems.push({ id: 'school-life', label: 'School Life' });
if (hasDeprivation) navItems.push({ id: 'local-area', label: 'Local Area' });
if (hasFinance) navItems.push({ id: 'finances', label: 'Finances' });
@@ -269,18 +302,28 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
// eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
}, [navItems.map(n => n.id).join(',')]);
// A report card is identified by the presence of report-card area
// judgements, NOT by `framework` — the API sets `framework` to the raw
// event grouping (e.g. "Schools - S5") even for report-card schools, so
// the old `framework === 'ReportCard'` test never matched and report cards
// were rendered as legacy ratings dated to a pre-Nov-2025 inspection.
const isReportCard = !!(
ofsted?.report_card && Object.keys(ofsted.report_card).length > 0
);
// A report card is dated by its own inspection (rc_inspection_date); the
// legacy inspection_date belongs to an older inspection and must never
// date a report card (report cards exist only from Nov 2025).
const ofstedInspectedDate = isReportCard
? ofsted?.rc_inspection_date ?? null
: ofsted?.inspection_date ?? null;
// ── Ofsted: detect if all OEIF sub-grades match the overall ───────────
const oeifAllSameGrade = (() => {
if (!ofsted || ofsted.framework === 'ReportCard') return false;
const subs = [
ofsted.quality_of_education,
ofsted.behaviour_attitudes,
ofsted.personal_development,
ofsted.leadership_management,
...(ofsted.early_years_provision != null ? [ofsted.early_years_provision] : []),
].filter((v): v is number => v != null);
return subs.length >= 3 && subs.every(v => v === ofsted.overall_effectiveness);
})();
const oeifAreas = ofsted ? ofstedLegacyAreas(ofsted) : [];
const oeifAllSameGrade =
!!ofsted &&
!isReportCard &&
oeifAreas.length >= 3 &&
oeifAreas.every((a) => a.value === ofsted.overall_effectiveness);
// Label shown in the mobile "section" menu button — the section in view.
const activeNavLabel = (navItems.find((n) => n.id === activeSection) ?? navItems[0])?.label ?? '';
@@ -309,6 +352,9 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
{schoolInfo.school_type && (
<span className={styles.metaItem}>{schoolInfo.school_type}</span>
)}
{isAllThrough && (
<span className={styles.metaItem}>All-through (primary &amp; secondary)</span>
)}
{schoolInfo.gender && schoolInfo.gender !== 'Mixed' && (
<span className={styles.metaItem}>{schoolInfo.gender}&apos;s school</span>
)}
@@ -507,10 +553,10 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
{ofsted && (
<section id="ofsted" className={styles.card}>
<h2 className={styles.sectionTitle}>
{ofsted.framework === 'ReportCard' ? 'Ofsted Report Card' : 'Ofsted Rating'}
{ofsted.inspection_date && (
{isReportCard ? 'Ofsted Report Card' : 'Ofsted Rating'}
{ofstedInspectedDate && (
<span className={styles.ofstedDate}>
Inspected {new Date(ofsted.inspection_date).toLocaleDateString('en-GB', { day: 'numeric', month: 'long', year: 'numeric' })}
Inspected {new Date(ofstedInspectedDate).toLocaleDateString('en-GB', { day: 'numeric', month: 'long', year: 'numeric' })}
</span>
)}
<a
@@ -525,13 +571,13 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
</a>
</h2>
{ofsted.framework === 'ReportCard' ? (
{isReportCard ? (
/* ── New Report Card layout ── */
<>
<p className={styles.ofstedDisclaimer}>
From November 2025, Ofsted replaced single overall grades with Report Cards rating schools across several areas.
</p>
<div className={styles.metricsGrid}>
<div className={`${styles.metricsGrid} ${styles.gradeGrid}`}>
{ofsted.rc_safeguarding_met != null && (
<div className={styles.metricCard}>
<div className={styles.metricLabel}>Safeguarding</div>
@@ -568,23 +614,17 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
)}
</div>
<p className={styles.ofstedDisclaimer}>
From September 2024, Ofsted no longer makes an overall effectiveness judgement in inspections of state-funded schools.
{ofsted.grade_source === 'ungraded_carried_forward'
? 'This overall grade is carried forward from an earlier inspection — Ofsted has since visited without issuing a new overall grade. From September 2024, Ofsted no longer makes an overall effectiveness judgement.'
: 'From September 2024, Ofsted no longer makes an overall effectiveness judgement in inspections of state-funded schools.'}
</p>
{oeifAllSameGrade ? (
<p className={styles.ofstedAllSame}>
Rated <strong>{OFSTED_LABELS[ofsted.overall_effectiveness!]}</strong> across all inspected areas Quality of Teaching, Behaviour, Pupils&apos; Development and Leadership.
</p>
) : (
<div className={styles.metricsGrid}>
{[
{ label: 'Quality of Teaching', value: ofsted.quality_of_education },
{ label: 'Behaviour in School', value: ofsted.behaviour_attitudes },
{ label: 'Pupils\' Wider Development', value: ofsted.personal_development },
{ label: 'School Leadership', value: ofsted.leadership_management },
...(ofsted.early_years_provision != null
? [{ label: 'Early Years (Reception)', value: ofsted.early_years_provision }]
: []),
].map(({ label, value }) => value != null && (
<div className={`${styles.metricsGrid} ${styles.gradeGrid}`}>
{oeifAreas.map(({ label, value }) => (
<div key={label} className={styles.metricCard}>
<div className={styles.metricLabel}>{label}</div>
<div className={`${styles.metricValue} ${styles[`ofstedGrade${value}`]}`}>
@@ -603,17 +643,31 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
{hasAnyResults && latestResults && (
<section id="results" className={styles.card}>
<h2 className={styles.sectionTitle}>
{isSecondary ? 'GCSE Results' : 'SATs Results'} ({formatAcademicYear(latestResults.year)})
{isAllThrough ? 'SATs & GCSE Results' : isSecondary ? 'GCSE Results' : 'SATs Results'} ({formatAcademicYear(latestResults.year)})
</h2>
<p className={styles.sectionSubtitle}>
{isSecondary
? 'GCSE results for Year 11 pupils. National averages shown for comparison.'
: 'End-of-primary-school tests taken by Year 6 pupils. National averages shown for comparison.'}
{isSpecial
? (isSecondary
? 'GCSE results for Year 11 pupils.'
: 'End-of-primary-school tests taken by Year 6 pupils.')
: isAllThrough
? 'KS2 SATs (end of Year 6) and GCSE results (Year 11) — this school covers both. England averages shown for comparison.'
: isSecondary
? 'GCSE results for Year 11 pupils. England averages shown for comparison.'
: 'End-of-primary-school tests taken by Year 6 pupils. England averages shown for comparison.'}
</p>
{/* Explains up front why the England comparison is dropped below, so
a 0% headline never reads as a failing grade against a benchmark
that doesn't fit. Type-aware copy (special vs PRU vs AP). */}
<SpecialSchoolNote school={schoolInfo} />
{/* ── Primary / KS2 content ── */}
{hasKS2Results && (
<>
{isAllThrough && (
<h3 className={styles.subSectionTitle}>Primary KS2 SATs (Year 6)</h3>
)}
<div className={styles.heroStatGrid}>
{latestResults.rwm_expected_pct !== null && (
<div className={styles.heroStatCard}>
@@ -623,7 +677,7 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
</div>
<div className={styles.heroStatValue}>
{formatPercentage(latestResults.rwm_expected_pct)}
{primaryAvg.rwm_expected_pct != null && (
{!suppressKs2Comparison && primaryAvg.rwm_expected_pct != null && (
<DeltaChip
value={latestResults.rwm_expected_pct}
baseline={primaryAvg.rwm_expected_pct}
@@ -632,8 +686,8 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
/>
)}
</div>
{primaryAvg.rwm_expected_pct != null && (
<div className={styles.heroStatHint}>National avg: {primaryAvg.rwm_expected_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
{!suppressKs2Comparison && primaryAvg.rwm_expected_pct != null && (
<div className={styles.heroStatHint}>England avg: {primaryAvg.rwm_expected_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
)}
</div>
)}
@@ -645,7 +699,7 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
</div>
<div className={styles.heroStatValue}>
{formatPercentage(latestResults.rwm_high_pct)}
{primaryAvg.rwm_high_pct != null && (
{!suppressKs2Comparison && primaryAvg.rwm_high_pct != null && (
<DeltaChip
value={latestResults.rwm_high_pct}
baseline={primaryAvg.rwm_high_pct}
@@ -654,14 +708,15 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
/>
)}
</div>
{primaryAvg.rwm_high_pct != null && (
<div className={styles.heroStatHint}>National avg: {primaryAvg.rwm_high_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
{!suppressKs2Comparison && primaryAvg.rwm_high_pct != null && (
<div className={styles.heroStatHint}>England avg: {primaryAvg.rwm_high_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
)}
</div>
)}
</div>
{latestResults.rwm_expected_pct != null &&
{!suppressKs2Comparison &&
latestResults.rwm_expected_pct != null &&
latestResults.reading_expected_pct != null &&
latestResults.writing_expected_pct != null &&
latestResults.maths_expected_pct != null && (
@@ -685,28 +740,34 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
</div>
)}
{/* All-zero placeholder rows (special / suppressed) would render as
three empty bars against the national markers — misleading, so
skip the chart. For a special school with some non-zero
subjects, keep the bars but drop the national markers. */}
{!ks2Placeholder && (
<SatsChart
subjects={[
{
name: 'Reading',
expectedPct: latestResults.reading_expected_pct,
exceedingPct: latestResults.reading_high_pct,
nationalExpectedPct: primaryAvg.reading_expected_pct,
nationalExpectedPct: suppressKs2Comparison ? null : primaryAvg.reading_expected_pct,
},
{
name: 'Writing',
expectedPct: latestResults.writing_expected_pct,
exceedingPct: latestResults.writing_high_pct,
nationalExpectedPct: primaryAvg.writing_expected_pct,
nationalExpectedPct: suppressKs2Comparison ? null : primaryAvg.writing_expected_pct,
},
{
name: 'Maths',
expectedPct: latestResults.maths_expected_pct,
exceedingPct: latestResults.maths_high_pct,
nationalExpectedPct: primaryAvg.maths_expected_pct,
nationalExpectedPct: suppressKs2Comparison ? null : primaryAvg.maths_expected_pct,
},
]}
/>
)}
{/* Progress scores row */}
{(latestResults.reading_progress != null || latestResults.writing_progress != null || latestResults.maths_progress != null) && (
@@ -752,6 +813,9 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
{/* ── Secondary / KS4 content ── */}
{hasKS4Results && (
<>
{isAllThrough && (
<h3 className={styles.subSectionTitle} style={{ marginTop: '1.5rem' }}>Secondary GCSEs (Year 11)</h3>
)}
<div className={styles.metricsGrid}>
{latestResults.attainment_8_score !== null && (
<div className={styles.metricCard}>
@@ -760,8 +824,8 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
<MetricTooltip metricKey="attainment_8_score" />
</div>
<div className={styles.metricValue}>{latestResults.attainment_8_score.toFixed(1)}</div>
{secondaryAvg.attainment_8_score != null && (
<div className={styles.metricHint}>National avg: {secondaryAvg.attainment_8_score.toFixed(1)}</div>
{!suppressKs4Comparison && secondaryAvg.attainment_8_score != null && (
<div className={styles.metricHint}>England avg: {secondaryAvg.attainment_8_score.toFixed(1)}</div>
)}
</div>
)}
@@ -784,8 +848,8 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
<MetricTooltip metricKey="english_maths_standard_pass_pct" />
</div>
<div className={styles.metricValue}>{formatPercentage(latestResults.english_maths_standard_pass_pct)}</div>
{secondaryAvg.english_maths_standard_pass_pct != null && (
<div className={styles.metricHint}>National avg: {secondaryAvg.english_maths_standard_pass_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
{!suppressKs4Comparison && secondaryAvg.english_maths_standard_pass_pct != null && (
<div className={styles.metricHint}>England avg: {secondaryAvg.english_maths_standard_pass_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
)}
</div>
)}
@@ -796,8 +860,8 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
<MetricTooltip metricKey="english_maths_strong_pass_pct" />
</div>
<div className={styles.metricValue}>{formatPercentage(latestResults.english_maths_strong_pass_pct)}</div>
{secondaryAvg.english_maths_strong_pass_pct != null && (
<div className={styles.metricHint}>National avg: {secondaryAvg.english_maths_strong_pass_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
{!suppressKs4Comparison && secondaryAvg.english_maths_strong_pass_pct != null && (
<div className={styles.metricHint}>England avg: {secondaryAvg.english_maths_strong_pass_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
)}
</div>
)}
@@ -861,6 +925,15 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
</div>
)}
</div>
{/* All-through admissions data covers a single entry point (usually the
Year 7 secondary intake), not reception — say so, or a parent could
read these as the whole-school figures. */}
{isAllThrough && admissions.school_phase && (
<p className={styles.sectionSubtitle}>
These figures are for {admissions.school_phase.toLowerCase()} entry
{/secondary/i.test(admissions.school_phase) ? ' (Year 7)' : /primary/i.test(admissions.school_phase) ? ' (Reception)' : ''}.
</p>
)}
<div className={styles.admissionsViewport}>
{/* This-year Q&A */}
@@ -902,6 +975,9 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
</div>
)}
</dl>
{admissionsSummary.chip && (
<p className={styles.admissionsTrendSummary}>{admissionsSummary.chip.text}</p>
)}
</div>
{/* Multi-year trend */}
@@ -937,7 +1013,7 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
<DeltaChip value={latestResults.disadvantaged_pct} baseline={primaryAvg.disadvantaged_pct} unit="pts" size="sm" />
)}
</div>
<div className={styles.heroStatHint}>Pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds{primaryAvg.disadvantaged_pct != null ? ` · national avg: ${primaryAvg.disadvantaged_pct.toFixed(0)}%` : ''}</div>
<div className={styles.heroStatHint}>Pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds{primaryAvg.disadvantaged_pct != null ? ` · England avg: ${primaryAvg.disadvantaged_pct.toFixed(0)}%` : ''}</div>
</div>
)}
{latestResults?.eal_pct != null && (
@@ -953,7 +1029,7 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
)}
</div>
{primaryAvg.eal_pct != null && (
<div className={styles.heroStatHint}>National avg: {primaryAvg.eal_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
<div className={styles.heroStatHint}>England avg: {primaryAvg.eal_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
)}
</div>
)}
@@ -970,7 +1046,7 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
)}
</div>
{primaryAvg.sen_support_pct != null && (
<div className={styles.heroStatHint}>National avg: {primaryAvg.sen_support_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
<div className={styles.heroStatHint}>England avg: {primaryAvg.sen_support_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
)}
</div>
)}
@@ -1034,16 +1110,52 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
{yearlyData.length > 0 && (
<section id="history" className={styles.card}>
<h2 className={styles.sectionTitle}>Results Over Time</h2>
{isAllThrough ? (
// All-through: KS2 and KS4 trends are on different scales and have
// different gap stories, so render them as two stacked charts
// rather than crowding 8+ series onto one axis.
<>
{hasKS2Results && (
<>
<h3 className={styles.subSectionTitle}>Primary KS2 SATs</h3>
<div className={styles.chartContainer}>
<PerformanceChart
data={yearlyData}
schoolName={schoolInfo.school_name}
isSecondary={false}
nationalRwmAvg={suppressKs2Comparison ? null : (primaryAvg.rwm_expected_pct ?? null)}
nationalByYear={suppressKs2Comparison ? undefined : nationalAvg?.by_year}
/>
</div>
</>
)}
{hasKS4Results && (
<>
<h3 className={styles.subSectionTitle} style={{ marginTop: '1.5rem' }}>Secondary GCSEs</h3>
<div className={styles.chartContainer}>
<PerformanceChart
data={yearlyData}
schoolName={schoolInfo.school_name}
isSecondary={true}
nationalAtt8Avg={suppressKs4Comparison ? null : (secondaryAvg.attainment_8_score ?? null)}
nationalByYear={suppressKs4Comparison ? undefined : nationalAvg?.by_year}
/>
</div>
</>
)}
</>
) : (
<div className={styles.chartContainer}>
<PerformanceChart
data={yearlyData}
schoolName={schoolInfo.school_name}
isSecondary={isSecondary}
nationalRwmAvg={isPrimary ? (primaryAvg.rwm_expected_pct ?? null) : null}
nationalAtt8Avg={isSecondary ? (secondaryAvg.attainment_8_score ?? null) : null}
nationalByYear={nationalAvg?.by_year}
nationalRwmAvg={isPrimary && !suppressKs2Comparison ? (primaryAvg.rwm_expected_pct ?? null) : null}
nationalAtt8Avg={isSecondary && !suppressKs4Comparison ? (secondaryAvg.attainment_8_score ?? null) : null}
nationalByYear={(isPrimary ? suppressKs2Comparison : suppressKs4Comparison) ? undefined : nationalAvg?.by_year}
/>
</div>
)}
{yearlyData.length > 1 && (
<details className={styles.historyDisclosure}>
<summary className={styles.historyToggle}>View raw year-by-year data</summary>
@@ -1052,7 +1164,15 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Year</th>
{isSecondary ? (
{isAllThrough ? (
<>
<th>RWM (expected %)</th>
<th>Exceeding (%)</th>
<th>Attainment 8</th>
<th>Progress 8</th>
<th>English &amp; Maths Grade 4+</th>
</>
) : isSecondary ? (
<>
<th>Attainment 8</th>
<th>Progress 8</th>
@@ -1074,7 +1194,15 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
{yearlyData.map((result) => (
<tr key={result.year}>
<td className={styles.yearCell}>{formatAcademicYear(result.year)}</td>
{isSecondary ? (
{isAllThrough ? (
<>
<td>{result.rwm_expected_pct !== null ? formatPercentage(result.rwm_expected_pct) : '-'}</td>
<td>{result.rwm_high_pct !== null ? formatPercentage(result.rwm_high_pct) : '-'}</td>
<td>{result.attainment_8_score !== null ? result.attainment_8_score.toFixed(1) : '-'}</td>
<td>{result.progress_8_score !== null ? formatProgress(result.progress_8_score) : '-'}</td>
<td>{result.english_maths_standard_pass_pct !== null ? formatPercentage(result.english_maths_standard_pass_pct) : '-'}</td>
</>
) : isSecondary ? (
<>
<td>{result.attainment_8_score !== null ? result.attainment_8_score.toFixed(1) : '-'}</td>
<td>{result.progress_8_score !== null ? formatProgress(result.progress_8_score) : '-'}</td>
@@ -1099,8 +1227,8 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
)}
</section>
)}
{/* Year 1 Phonics — primary only */}
{hasPhonics && isPrimary && phonics && (
{/* Year 1 Phonics — primary-stage metric (pure primary + all-through) */}
{hasPhonics && showPrimaryContent && phonics && (
<section id="phonics" className={styles.card}>
<h2 className={styles.sectionTitle}>Year 1 Phonics ({formatAcademicYear(phonics.year)})</h2>
<p className={styles.sectionSubtitle}>
@@ -1142,7 +1270,7 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
</div>
<div className={styles.metricValue}>{formatPercentage(absenceData.overall_absence_rate)}</div>
{primaryAvg.overall_absence_pct != null && (
<div className={styles.metricHint}>National avg: ~{primaryAvg.overall_absence_pct.toFixed(1)}%</div>
<div className={styles.metricHint}>England avg: ~{primaryAvg.overall_absence_pct.toFixed(1)}%</div>
)}
</div>
)}
@@ -1154,7 +1282,7 @@ export function SchoolDetailView({
</div>
<div className={styles.metricValue}>{formatPercentage(absenceData.persistent_absence_rate)}</div>
{primaryAvg.persistent_absence_pct != null && (
<div className={styles.metricHint}>National avg: ~{primaryAvg.persistent_absence_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
<div className={styles.metricHint}>England avg: ~{primaryAvg.persistent_absence_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
)}
</div>
)}
+19 -6
View File
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
*/
import type { School } from '@/lib/types';
import { formatPercentage, calculateTrend, getPhaseStyle, schoolUrl, buildOfstedListBadge, formatAgeRange, isProposedToClose } from '@/lib/utils';
import { formatPercentage, calculateTrend, getPhaseStyle, schoolUrl, buildOfstedListBadge, formatAgeRange, isProposedToClose, isSpecialSchool } from '@/lib/utils';
import styles from './SchoolRow.module.css';
interface SchoolRowProps {
@@ -38,10 +38,23 @@ export function SchoolRow({
school.religious_denomination &&
school.religious_denomination !== 'Does not apply';
// vs-national delta
// A placeholder all-zero row (every subject 0 — a special/suppressed
// signature, matching SchoolDetailView's ks2Placeholder) isn't a real score,
// so its figure is hidden. A genuine 0% combined (some pupils met individual
// subjects but not all three) is NOT all-zero and stays shown.
const rwmPlaceholder =
school.rwm_expected_pct === 0 &&
(school.reading_expected_pct ?? 0) === 0 &&
(school.writing_expected_pct ?? 0) === 0 &&
(school.maths_expected_pct ?? 0) === 0;
// The school's OWN figure and its year-over-year trend are same-school
// measures — shown whenever there's a real value, special schools included.
const showRwmValue = school.rwm_expected_pct != null && !rwmPlaceholder;
// The vs-England delta is a mainstream benchmark: additionally dropped for
// special schools / PRUs / AP, whose pupils aren't measured against it fairly.
const rwmDelta =
school.rwm_expected_pct != null && nationalAvgRwm != null
? Math.round(school.rwm_expected_pct - nationalAvgRwm)
showRwmValue && !isSpecialSchool(school) && nationalAvgRwm != null
? Math.round((school.rwm_expected_pct as number) - nationalAvgRwm)
: null;
const handleCompareClick = () => {
@@ -87,9 +100,9 @@ export function SchoolRow({
<div className={styles.line3}>
<span className={styles.stat}>
<strong className={styles.statValue}>
{school.rwm_expected_pct != null ? formatPercentage(school.rwm_expected_pct, 0) : '—'}
{showRwmValue ? formatPercentage(school.rwm_expected_pct, 0) : '—'}
</strong>
{school.prev_rwm_expected_pct != null && (
{showRwmValue && school.prev_rwm_expected_pct != null && (
<span
className={`${styles.trend} ${styles[`trend${trend.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + trend.slice(1)}`]}`}
title={`Previous year: ${formatPercentage(school.prev_rwm_expected_pct)}`}
@@ -623,6 +623,41 @@
color: var(--accent-coral-dark, #b04a2e);
}
/* ── Ofsted grade grids (Report Card + OEIF) ──
Uniform, vertically-aligned grade chips. Labels reserve two lines so
single- and double-line labels put their chips on the same baseline;
every chip (Met, Strong, Expected standard, …) shares one font size,
padding and min-height regardless of how many lines its text wraps to. */
.gradeGrid .metricCard {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
gap: 0.5rem;
padding: 0.85rem 0.75rem;
}
.gradeGrid .metricLabel {
min-height: 2.6em;
margin: 0;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
text-align: center;
}
.gradeGrid .metricValue {
margin-top: auto;
display: inline-flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
max-width: 100%;
min-height: 2.6em;
padding: 0.3rem 0.7rem;
border-radius: 5px;
font-size: 1rem;
font-weight: 700;
line-height: 1.25;
text-align: center;
}
.ofstedDisclaimer {
font-size: 0.8rem;
color: var(--text-muted, #8a847a);
@@ -1049,8 +1084,12 @@
font-size: 1.85rem;
}
/* On mobile let the chart container flow naturally — PerformanceChart's
own .chartWrapper carries the definite canvas height (220px) plus the
chip strip above it. A fixed 220px here double-constrained the two and
clipped the chips onto the plot area. */
.chartContainer {
height: 220px;
height: auto;
}
.dataTable {
@@ -23,8 +23,9 @@ import type {
SchoolAdmissions, SenDetail, Phonics,
SchoolDeprivation, SchoolFinance, NationalAverages,
} from '@/lib/types';
import { formatPercentage, formatProgress, formatAcademicYear, formatAgeRange, isProposedToClose } from '@/lib/utils';
import { formatPercentage, formatProgress, formatAcademicYear, formatAgeRange, isProposedToClose, ofstedLegacyAreas, isSpecialSchool } from '@/lib/utils';
import { DeltaChip } from './DeltaChip';
import { SpecialSchoolNote } from './SpecialSchoolNote';
import { track, getNavigationSource } from '@/lib/analytics';
import styles from './SecondarySchoolDetailView.module.css';
@@ -107,6 +108,16 @@ export function SecondarySchoolDetailView({
const p8Suspended = latestResults != null && latestResults.year >= 202425;
const hasResults = latestResults?.attainment_8_score != null;
// Special schools / PRUs / AP sit the same GCSEs but teach pupils with SEND,
// so their headline attainment is far below the mainstream average by design.
// Drop the England comparison + "below" framing so the page doesn't portray
// them as failing against a benchmark that doesn't fit. Attainment 8 is a
// single 080 score with no subject breakdown to test for a placeholder, so
// this keys off establishment type only — a genuine (if extreme) 0.0 at a
// mainstream school still shows its real value and comparison.
const isSpecial = isSpecialSchool(schoolInfo);
const suppressComparison = isSpecial;
const admissionsTag = (() => {
const policy = schoolInfo.admissions_policy?.toLowerCase() ?? '';
if (policy.includes('selective')) return 'Selective';
@@ -186,18 +197,27 @@ export function SecondarySchoolDetailView({
// eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
}, [navItems.map(n => n.id).join(',')]);
// A report card is identified by the presence of report-card area
// judgements, NOT by `framework` — the API sets `framework` to the raw
// event grouping (e.g. "Schools - S5") even for report-card schools, so
// the old `framework === 'ReportCard'` test never matched and report cards
// were rendered as legacy ratings dated to a pre-Nov-2025 inspection.
const isReportCard = !!(
ofsted?.report_card && Object.keys(ofsted.report_card).length > 0
);
// Report cards are dated by their own inspection (rc_inspection_date), never
// the legacy inspection_date (report cards exist only from Nov 2025).
const ofstedInspectedDate = isReportCard
? ofsted?.rc_inspection_date ?? null
: ofsted?.inspection_date ?? null;
// ── Ofsted: detect if all OEIF sub-grades match the overall ───────────
const oeifAllSameGrade = (() => {
if (!ofsted || ofsted.framework === 'ReportCard') return false;
const subs = [
ofsted.quality_of_education,
ofsted.behaviour_attitudes,
ofsted.personal_development,
ofsted.leadership_management,
...(ofsted.early_years_provision != null ? [ofsted.early_years_provision] : []),
].filter((v): v is number => v != null);
return subs.length >= 3 && subs.every(v => v === ofsted.overall_effectiveness);
})();
const oeifAreas = ofsted ? ofstedLegacyAreas(ofsted) : [];
const oeifAllSameGrade =
!!ofsted &&
!isReportCard &&
oeifAreas.length >= 3 &&
oeifAreas.every((a) => a.value === ofsted.overall_effectiveness);
// National Attainment 8 baseline for the "Results Over Time" chart.
const heroAtt8Nat = secondaryAvg.attainment_8_score ?? null;
@@ -332,10 +352,10 @@ export function SecondarySchoolDetailView({
{ofsted && (
<section id="ofsted" className={styles.card}>
<h2 className={styles.sectionTitle}>
{ofsted.framework === 'ReportCard' ? 'Ofsted Report Card' : 'Ofsted Rating'}
{ofsted.inspection_date && (
{isReportCard ? 'Ofsted Report Card' : 'Ofsted Rating'}
{ofstedInspectedDate && (
<span className={styles.ofstedDate}>
{' '}Inspected {new Date(ofsted.inspection_date).toLocaleDateString('en-GB', { day: 'numeric', month: 'long', year: 'numeric' })}
{' '}Inspected {new Date(ofstedInspectedDate).toLocaleDateString('en-GB', { day: 'numeric', month: 'long', year: 'numeric' })}
</span>
)}
<a
@@ -349,12 +369,12 @@ export function SecondarySchoolDetailView({
Ofsted reports
</a>
</h2>
{ofsted.framework === 'ReportCard' ? (
{isReportCard ? (
<>
<p className={styles.ofstedDisclaimer}>
From November 2025, Ofsted replaced single overall grades with Report Cards rating schools across several areas.
</p>
<div className={styles.metricsGrid}>
<div className={`${styles.metricsGrid} ${styles.gradeGrid}`}>
{ofsted.rc_safeguarding_met != null && (
<div className={styles.metricCard}>
<div className={styles.metricLabel}>Safeguarding</div>
@@ -390,23 +410,17 @@ export function SecondarySchoolDetailView({
)}
</div>
<p className={styles.ofstedDisclaimer}>
From September 2024, Ofsted no longer makes an overall effectiveness judgement in inspections.
{ofsted.grade_source === 'ungraded_carried_forward'
? 'This overall grade is carried forward from an earlier inspection — Ofsted has since visited without issuing a new overall grade. From September 2024, Ofsted no longer makes an overall effectiveness judgement.'
: 'From September 2024, Ofsted no longer makes an overall effectiveness judgement in inspections.'}
</p>
{oeifAllSameGrade ? (
<p className={styles.ofstedAllSame}>
Rated <strong>{OFSTED_LABELS[ofsted.overall_effectiveness]}</strong> across all inspected areas Quality of Teaching, Behaviour, Pupils&apos; Development and Leadership.
</p>
) : (
<div className={styles.metricsGrid}>
{[
{ label: 'Quality of Teaching', value: ofsted.quality_of_education },
{ label: 'Behaviour in School', value: ofsted.behaviour_attitudes },
{ label: 'Pupils\' Wider Development', value: ofsted.personal_development },
{ label: 'School Leadership', value: ofsted.leadership_management },
...(ofsted.early_years_provision != null
? [{ label: 'Early Years (Reception)', value: ofsted.early_years_provision }]
: []),
].map(({ label, value }) => value != null && (
<div className={`${styles.metricsGrid} ${styles.gradeGrid}`}>
{oeifAreas.map(({ label, value }) => (
<div key={label} className={styles.metricCard}>
<div className={styles.metricLabel}>{label}</div>
<div className={`${styles.metricValue} ${styles[`ofstedGrade${value}`]}`}>
@@ -422,7 +436,7 @@ export function SecondarySchoolDetailView({
<p className={styles.sectionSubtitle}>
From September 2024, Ofsted no longer gives a single overall grade.
</p>
<div className={styles.metricsGrid}>
<div className={`${styles.metricsGrid} ${styles.gradeGrid}`}>
{[
{ label: 'Quality of Education', value: ofsted.quality_of_education },
{ label: 'Behaviour & Attitudes', value: ofsted.behaviour_attitudes },
@@ -449,12 +463,15 @@ export function SecondarySchoolDetailView({
GCSE Results ({formatAcademicYear(latestResults.year)})
</h2>
<p className={styles.sectionSubtitle}>
GCSE results for Year 11 pupils. National averages shown for comparison.
GCSE results for Year 11 pupils.{!suppressComparison && ' England averages shown for comparison.'}
</p>
<SpecialSchoolNote school={schoolInfo} />
{p8Suspended && (
<div className={styles.p8Banner}>
Progress 8 scores for 2024/25 are not used for accountability purposes following the KS2 assessment disruption. Treat with caution.
Progress 8 isn&apos;t published for 2024/25: this GCSE year group sat no KS2 tests
(COVID), so DfE has no starting point to measure their progress from.
</div>
)}
@@ -468,7 +485,7 @@ export function SecondarySchoolDetailView({
</div>
<div className={styles.heroStatValue}>
{latestResults.attainment_8_score.toFixed(1)}
{secondaryAvg.attainment_8_score != null && (
{!suppressComparison && secondaryAvg.attainment_8_score != null && (
<DeltaChip
value={latestResults.attainment_8_score}
baseline={secondaryAvg.attainment_8_score}
@@ -477,8 +494,8 @@ export function SecondarySchoolDetailView({
/>
)}
</div>
{secondaryAvg.attainment_8_score != null && (
<div className={styles.heroStatHint}>National avg: {secondaryAvg.attainment_8_score.toFixed(1)}</div>
{!suppressComparison && secondaryAvg.attainment_8_score != null && (
<div className={styles.heroStatHint}>England avg: {secondaryAvg.attainment_8_score.toFixed(1)}</div>
)}
</div>
)}
@@ -508,7 +525,7 @@ export function SecondarySchoolDetailView({
</div>
<div className={styles.heroStatValue}>
{formatPercentage(latestResults.english_maths_strong_pass_pct)}
{secondaryAvg.english_maths_strong_pass_pct != null && (
{!suppressComparison && secondaryAvg.english_maths_strong_pass_pct != null && (
<DeltaChip
value={latestResults.english_maths_strong_pass_pct}
baseline={secondaryAvg.english_maths_strong_pass_pct}
@@ -517,8 +534,8 @@ export function SecondarySchoolDetailView({
/>
)}
</div>
{secondaryAvg.english_maths_strong_pass_pct != null && (
<div className={styles.heroStatHint}>National avg: {secondaryAvg.english_maths_strong_pass_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
{!suppressComparison && secondaryAvg.english_maths_strong_pass_pct != null && (
<div className={styles.heroStatHint}>England avg: {secondaryAvg.english_maths_strong_pass_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
)}
</div>
)}
@@ -530,7 +547,7 @@ export function SecondarySchoolDetailView({
</div>
<div className={styles.heroStatValue}>
{formatPercentage(latestResults.english_maths_standard_pass_pct)}
{secondaryAvg.english_maths_standard_pass_pct != null && (
{!suppressComparison && secondaryAvg.english_maths_standard_pass_pct != null && (
<DeltaChip
value={latestResults.english_maths_standard_pass_pct}
baseline={secondaryAvg.english_maths_standard_pass_pct}
@@ -539,15 +556,17 @@ export function SecondarySchoolDetailView({
/>
)}
</div>
{secondaryAvg.english_maths_standard_pass_pct != null && (
<div className={styles.heroStatHint}>National avg: {secondaryAvg.english_maths_standard_pass_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
{!suppressComparison && secondaryAvg.english_maths_standard_pass_pct != null && (
<div className={styles.heroStatHint}>England avg: {secondaryAvg.english_maths_standard_pass_pct.toFixed(0)}%</div>
)}
</div>
)}
</div>
{/* Attainment 8 visual bar (080 scale) */}
{latestResults.attainment_8_score != null && (
{/* Attainment 8 visual bar (080 scale). This viz is explicitly
"school vs national", so it's dropped for special schools where
that comparison isn't meaningful. */}
{!suppressComparison && latestResults.attainment_8_score != null && (
<div className={styles.att8Viz}>
<div className={styles.att8VizLabel}>Attainment 8 school vs national</div>
<div className={styles.att8VizTrack}>
@@ -739,8 +758,8 @@ export function SecondarySchoolDetailView({
data={yearlyData}
schoolName={schoolInfo.school_name}
isSecondary={true}
nationalAtt8Avg={heroAtt8Nat}
nationalByYear={nationalAvg?.by_year}
nationalAtt8Avg={suppressComparison ? null : heroAtt8Nat}
nationalByYear={suppressComparison ? undefined : nationalAvg?.by_year}
/>
</div>
</>
+8 -2
View File
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
'use client';
import type { School } from '@/lib/types';
import { buildOfstedListBadge, getPhaseStyle, schoolUrl, formatAgeRange, isProposedToClose } from '@/lib/utils';
import { buildOfstedListBadge, getPhaseStyle, schoolUrl, formatAgeRange, isProposedToClose, isSpecialSchool } from '@/lib/utils';
import styles from './SecondarySchoolRow.module.css';
function detectAdmissionsTag(school: School): string | null {
@@ -55,8 +55,14 @@ export function SecondarySchoolRow({
const ofstedBadge = buildOfstedListBadge(school);
const phase = getPhaseStyle(school.phase);
const att8 = school.attainment_8_score;
// The school's own Attainment 8 is a same-school figure — shown whenever it
// exists (special schools included; their type tag on line 2 gives context).
// Only the vs-LA-average delta, a benchmark comparison, is dropped for
// special schools / PRUs / AP, whose pupils aren't measured against it fairly.
const laDelta =
att8 != null && laAvgAttainment8 != null ? att8 - laAvgAttainment8 : null;
att8 != null && !isSpecialSchool(school) && laAvgAttainment8 != null
? att8 - laAvgAttainment8
: null;
const admissionsTag = detectAdmissionsTag(school);
const sixthForm = hasSixthForm(school);
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
/* Special-school / PRU / AP context note: soft, informational (teal), not a
warning. Shared by both detail views so the styling can't drift. */
.note {
background: var(--bg-secondary, #f3ede4);
border-left: 4px solid var(--accent-teal, #2d7d7d);
border-radius: 0 6px 6px 0;
padding: 0.7rem 1rem;
margin: 0 0 1rem;
font-size: 0.9rem;
line-height: 1.5;
color: var(--text-secondary, #5c564d);
}
.note strong {
color: var(--text-primary, #1a1612);
}
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
/**
* SpecialSchoolNote — the context note shown on special-school / PRU / AP
* detail pages explaining why the mainstream England-average comparison is
* dropped. Renders nothing for mainstream schools.
*
* The copy is type-aware: only genuine special schools have pupils with special
* educational needs. Pupil referral units and alternative provision teach
* pupils educated outside a mainstream setting (e.g. after exclusion, or for
* medical reasons) who are not necessarily SEND — so their note says so rather
* than mischaracterising them. Suppressing the England comparison is reasonable
* for all three.
*/
import { isSpecialSchool } from '@/lib/utils';
import styles from './SpecialSchoolNote.module.css';
type SpecialKind = 'special' | 'pru' | 'ap';
function specialKind(schoolType: string | null | undefined): SpecialKind {
const t = (schoolType ?? '').toLowerCase();
if (/pupil referral/.test(t)) return 'pru';
if (/alternative provision/.test(t)) return 'ap';
return 'special';
}
export function SpecialSchoolNote({ school }: { school: { school_type?: string | null } }) {
if (!isSpecialSchool(school)) return null;
const kind = specialKind(school.school_type);
return (
<div className={styles.note} role="note">
{kind === 'special' && (
<>
<strong>This is a special school.</strong> Its pupils have special educational needs and
work towards individual targets. They sit the same national assessments, but very few
reach the mainstream &ldquo;expected standard&rdquo; these measures report so a
comparison with the England average isn&rsquo;t a meaningful guide to the school.
</>
)}
{kind === 'pru' && (
<>
<strong>This is a pupil referral unit.</strong> It teaches pupils educated outside a
mainstream school for example after exclusion, or for medical or behavioural reasons.
The mainstream &ldquo;expected standard&rdquo; and the England-average comparison
aren&rsquo;t a meaningful guide to the school.
</>
)}
{kind === 'ap' && (
<>
<strong>This is an alternative provision setting.</strong> It teaches pupils educated
outside a mainstream school. The mainstream &ldquo;expected standard&rdquo; and the
England-average comparison aren&rsquo;t a meaningful guide to the school.
</>
)}{' '}
Where available, the progress its pupils make is a fairer measure.
</div>
);
}
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
'use client';
import { latestValues, verdict } from '@/lib/compareLogic';
import { isSpecialSchool } from '@/lib/utils';
import type { Benchmarks, ComparisonData, NationalAverages, School } from '@/lib/types';
import { DotStrip } from '@/components/DotStrip';
import { Cell, Chip, RowLabel, Section, SectionGrid, sectionStyles as s } from './sectionShared';
@@ -90,15 +91,19 @@ function Strip({
urns,
schoolNames,
national,
special,
}: {
spec: StripSpec;
data: Record<string, ComparisonData>;
urns: number[];
schoolNames: string[];
national: Record<string, number> | undefined;
/** Per-school special-school flag; special schools' mainstream attainment is
* not a fair comparison, so it's dropped from the strip (no dot). */
special: boolean[];
}) {
const values = latestValues(data, urns, spec.metric).map((v) =>
v != null ? Math.round(v) : null,
const values = latestValues(data, urns, spec.metric).map((v, i) =>
v != null && !special[i] ? Math.round(v) : null,
);
const anchorValue = spec.anchorKey ? national?.[spec.anchorKey] : undefined;
const anchor =
@@ -135,12 +140,19 @@ export function CompareAcademics({
}) {
const urns = schools.map((school) => school.urn);
const schoolNames = schools.map((school) => school.school_name);
// Special schools / PRUs / AP: their pupils sit the same assessments but very
// few reach the mainstream standard, so their attainment isn't a fair
// like-for-like comparison — drop it (progress banding, which IS meaningful,
// is kept).
const specialFlags = schools.map((school) => isSpecialSchool(school));
const dropSpecial = (vals: Array<number | null>) =>
vals.map((v, i) => (specialFlags[i] ? null : v));
const isSecondary = propIsSecondary !== undefined ? propIsSecondary : schools.some(
(school) => data[String(school.urn)]?.school_info?.attainment_8_score != null,
);
if (isSecondary) {
const att8 = latestValues(data, urns, 'attainment_8_score');
const att8 = dropSpecial(latestValues(data, urns, 'attainment_8_score'));
const banding = urns.map((urn) => {
const rows = data[String(urn)]?.yearly_data ?? [];
for (let i = rows.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
@@ -159,8 +171,8 @@ export function CompareAcademics({
const y = rows.length ? Math.trunc(rows[rows.length - 1].year) : 0;
return y >= 202425;
});
const grade5 = latestValues(data, urns, 'english_maths_strong_pass_pct');
const ebacc = latestValues(data, urns, 'ebacc_entry_pct');
const grade5 = dropSpecial(latestValues(data, urns, 'english_maths_strong_pass_pct'));
const ebacc = dropSpecial(latestValues(data, urns, 'ebacc_entry_pct'));
const att8Anchor = nationalAverages?.secondary?.attainment_8_score;
const grade5Anchor = nationalAverages?.secondary?.english_maths_strong_pass_pct;
const ebaccAnchor = nationalAverages?.secondary?.ebacc_entry_pct;
@@ -272,7 +284,7 @@ export function CompareAcademics({
}
const national = nationalAverages?.primary;
const disadvantaged = latestValues(data, urns, 'rwm_expected_disadvantaged_pct');
const disadvantaged = dropSpecial(latestValues(data, urns, 'rwm_expected_disadvantaged_pct'));
const disadvantagedAnchor = benchmarks?.primary?.disadvantaged_rwm_expected_pct ?? null;
// Cohort size behind the disadvantaged figure (spec §8.5): these are small
// groups where single pupils move the percentage — show roughly how many
@@ -307,6 +319,7 @@ export function CompareAcademics({
urns={urns}
schoolNames={schoolNames}
national={national}
special={specialFlags}
/>
))}
@@ -320,6 +333,7 @@ export function CompareAcademics({
urns={urns}
schoolNames={schoolNames}
national={national}
special={specialFlags}
/>
))}
<p className={styles.stripNote}>
@@ -239,8 +239,17 @@ export function CompareOfsted({
`https://reports.ofsted.gov.uk/provider/21/${school.urn}`;
return (
<Cell key={school.urn} school={school} index={i}>
<a className={s.link} href={url} target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
{school.school_name}&apos;s Ofsted page
{/* Short visible label to save space on mobile (the coloured
school name already leads the row); the full name stays in
aria-label so screen readers can tell the links apart. */}
<a
className={s.link}
href={url}
target="_blank"
rel="noopener noreferrer"
aria-label={`${school.school_name}'s Ofsted page`}
>
Ofsted page
</a>
</Cell>
);
@@ -72,15 +72,18 @@
align-items: center;
gap: 0.4rem;
flex-basis: 100%;
font-size: 0.8rem;
/* Slightly larger than the values below it so the school each row belongs
to is easy to read on mobile (hidden on desktop, where the column header
names the school). */
font-size: 0.9rem;
font-weight: 600;
color: var(--sc, var(--text-secondary));
margin-bottom: 0.15rem;
margin-bottom: 0.2rem;
}
.cellDot {
width: 9px;
height: 9px;
width: 10px;
height: 10px;
border-radius: 50%;
background: var(--dot, var(--text-muted));
flex: none;
+3
View File
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ export interface School {
// Ofsted (for list view — summary only)
ofsted_grade?: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | null;
/** Report-card inspection date (Nov 2025+); non-null identifies a report
* card in the list/map, where the full report_card object isn't available. */
ofsted_rc_date?: string | null;
ofsted_date?: string | null;
ofsted_framework?: string | null;
}
+71 -6
View File
@@ -680,6 +680,42 @@ export function buildSchoolSummary(
return parts.join(', ') + '.';
}
// ─── Legacy (OEIF) sub-judgement areas ────────────────────────────────────────
export interface OfstedLegacyArea {
label: string;
value: number;
}
/**
* The published OEIF sub-judgement areas for the legacy Ofsted layout, in
* display order. Only real grades (14) are returned: Ofsted's sentinel
* codes for "not applicable / no judgement" (9, and any 0/8 variants) and
* nulls are filtered out, so a cryptic "9" never renders as a rating.
* Sixth Form provision is included where a school has one — it was
* previously dropped from the detail grid entirely.
*/
export function ofstedLegacyAreas(ofsted: {
quality_of_education?: number | null;
behaviour_attitudes?: number | null;
personal_development?: number | null;
leadership_management?: number | null;
early_years_provision?: number | null;
sixth_form_provision?: number | null;
}): OfstedLegacyArea[] {
const candidates: Array<[string, number | null | undefined]> = [
['Quality of Teaching', ofsted.quality_of_education],
['Behaviour in School', ofsted.behaviour_attitudes],
["Pupils' Wider Development", ofsted.personal_development],
['School Leadership', ofsted.leadership_management],
['Early Years (Reception)', ofsted.early_years_provision],
['Sixth Form', ofsted.sixth_form_provision],
];
return candidates
.filter((c): c is [string, number] => c[1] != null && c[1] >= 1 && c[1] <= 4)
.map(([label, value]) => ({ label, value }));
}
// ─── List-level Ofsted badge ──────────────────────────────────────────────────
export interface OfstedListBadge {
@@ -691,9 +727,12 @@ export interface OfstedListBadge {
/**
* Build the Ofsted badge for a school card in the list/map view.
* Three states:
* States, in priority order:
* - Report Card school (ofsted_rc_date set): "Report Card · YYYY" in purple.
* Checked FIRST so it wins over any carried-forward legacy grade — the
* list has no full report_card object, and ofsted_framework is the raw
* event grouping ("Schools - S5"), never "ReportCard".
* - OEIF school (ofsted_grade set): grade word + year, colour-keyed
* - ReportCard school (ofsted_framework === 'ReportCard'): "Report Card · YYYY" in purple
* - Inspected without an overall grade (OEIF post-Sept-2024, where Ofsted no
* longer issues an overall judgement): "Inspected · YYYY" — mirrors the
* detail page's hero chip so a school never reads as both inspected and
@@ -704,7 +743,16 @@ export function buildOfstedListBadge(school: {
ofsted_grade?: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | null;
ofsted_date?: string | null;
ofsted_framework?: string | null;
ofsted_rc_date?: string | null;
}): OfstedListBadge {
// A report card wins over any carried-forward legacy grade — signalled by
// ofsted_rc_date. ofsted_framework is the raw event grouping ("Schools -
// S5"), never "ReportCard", so it can't detect report cards.
if (school.ofsted_rc_date) {
const rcYear = new Date(school.ofsted_rc_date).getFullYear();
return { label: `Report Card · ${rcYear}`, cssClass: 'ofstedRc' };
}
const year = school.ofsted_date
? new Date(school.ofsted_date).getFullYear()
: null;
@@ -723,10 +771,6 @@ export function buildOfstedListBadge(school: {
};
}
if (school.ofsted_framework === 'ReportCard') {
return { label: `Report Card${yearStr}`, cssClass: 'ofstedRc' };
}
// An inspection is on record (date or framework present) but carries no
// overall grade — a post-Sept-2024 OEIF inspection. Distinct from a school
// that has genuinely never been inspected.
@@ -751,3 +795,24 @@ export const PROPOSED_TO_CLOSE_STATUS = 'Open, but proposed to close';
export function isProposedToClose(school: { status?: string | null }): boolean {
return school.status === PROPOSED_TO_CLOSE_STATUS;
}
/**
* Special schools, pupil referral units and alternative provision teach pupils
* with SEND or outside mainstream settings. Their pupils sit the same KS2/KS4
* assessments but very few reach the mainstream "expected standard", so the
* headline attainment measures — and any comparison to the England average —
* are not a fair judgement of the school. Callers use this to drop the
* mainstream-benchmark framing (deltas, "below England", national markers)
* rather than portray these schools as failing.
*
* Detection is by establishment type: every DfE special-school type contains
* "special" (e.g. "Community special school", "Academy special converter/sponsor
* led", "Foundation special school", "Non-maintained special school", "Free
* schools special", "Other independent special school"); PRUs and alternative
* provision are matched by name. Special schools carry a mainstream `phase`
* (Primary/Secondary/All-through), so `phase` alone can't identify them.
*/
export function isSpecialSchool(school: { school_type?: string | null }): boolean {
const t = (school.school_type ?? '').toLowerCase();
return /\bspecial\b/.test(t) || /pupil referral/.test(t) || /alternative provision/.test(t);
}