Batch C (points 7-10): inclusion/admissions framing on the detail page.
Point 7 — banded admissions. The admissions section showed the first-choice offer rate as a bare percentage. It now carries the compare screen's banded interpretation as a line under the tiles — "More than half of first choices missed out" (<50%), "About 1 in 3…" (50-66%), "Over 1 in 4…" (67-74%) — by reusing summariseAdmissions. (Selective/faith framing was already present via admissionsTag.)
Point 8 — plain-English Progress 8. Replaced the jargon banner ("not used for accountability purposes following the KS2 assessment disruption · Treat with caution") with the compare wording: "Progress 8 isn't published for 2024/25: this GCSE year group sat no KS2 tests (COVID), so DfE has no starting point to measure their progress from."
Points 9 & 10 don't apply to the detail page. It shows disadvantaged composition (% of pupils who are disadvantaged), not disadvantaged attainment, so there's no small-cohort figure needing a "~N pupils" caveat; and it has no FSM-vs-benchmark comparison, so no cross-definition fallback to fix. Both were compare-specific.
Also fixed a stray lowercase "national avg" provenance string that Batch B's rename missed.
Copy/logic reuse only; 105 frontend tests green. The banding logic is already unit-tested in compareLogic.test.ts.
Batch C (points 7-10): inclusion/admissions framing on the detail page.
- **Point 7 — banded admissions.** The admissions section showed the first-choice offer rate as a bare percentage. It now carries the compare screen's banded interpretation as a line under the tiles — "More than half of first choices missed out" (<50%), "About 1 in 3…" (50-66%), "Over 1 in 4…" (67-74%) — by reusing `summariseAdmissions`. (Selective/faith framing was already present via `admissionsTag`.)
- **Point 8 — plain-English Progress 8.** Replaced the jargon banner ("not used for accountability purposes following the KS2 assessment disruption · Treat with caution") with the compare wording: "Progress 8 isn't published for 2024/25: this GCSE year group sat no KS2 tests (COVID), so DfE has no starting point to measure their progress from."
- **Points 9 & 10 don't apply to the detail page.** It shows disadvantaged *composition* (% of pupils who are disadvantaged), not disadvantaged *attainment*, so there's no small-cohort figure needing a "~N pupils" caveat; and it has no FSM-vs-benchmark comparison, so no cross-definition fallback to fix. Both were compare-specific.
- Also fixed a stray lowercase "national avg" provenance string that Batch B's rename missed.
Copy/logic reuse only; 105 frontend tests green. The banding logic is already unit-tested in `compareLogic.test.ts`.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
Batch C (points 7-10):
- Point 7: the admissions section shows the first-choice offer rate but no
sense of how severe a low rate is. Reuse the compare screen's banded
summariseAdmissions ('More than half of first choices missed out' etc.)
as an interpretive line under the tiles. (Selective/faith framing was
already present via admissionsTag.)
- Point 8: replace the jargon P8-suspended banner ('not used for
accountability purposes ... treat with caution') with the compare
screen's plain-English 'no KS2 baseline (COVID)' explanation.
- Points 9 (disadvantaged cohort sizes) and 10 (FSM benchmark) don't apply
to the detail page: it shows disadvantaged composition, not disadvantaged
attainment, and no FSM-vs-benchmark comparison — so there's no small-cohort
caveat or cross-definition fallback to fix here.
- Also fixed a stray lowercase 'national avg' provenance string Batch B
missed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
This PR adds a banded plain-English admissions summary chip to the primary school detail view (reusing summariseAdmissions from lib/compareLogic, same logic as the compare screen), renames a 'national avg' label to 'England avg' for provenance clarity, and rewords the Progress 8 suspension banner for 2024/25 to explain the COVID KS2 cause in plain English. All changes are additive/textual, the new function handles null admissions safely, and the referenced CSS class already exists.
✅ No issues found.
## 🤖 AI Code Review (Claude Code)
This PR adds a banded plain-English admissions summary chip to the primary school detail view (reusing summariseAdmissions from lib/compareLogic, same logic as the compare screen), renames a 'national avg' label to 'England avg' for provenance clarity, and rewords the Progress 8 suspension banner for 2024/25 to explain the COVID KS2 cause in plain English. All changes are additive/textual, the new function handles null admissions safely, and the referenced CSS class already exists.
✅ No issues found.
tudor
merged commit 31ae13451a into main2026-07-20 11:11:39 +00:00
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Batch C (points 7-10): inclusion/admissions framing on the detail page.
summariseAdmissions. (Selective/faith framing was already present viaadmissionsTag.)Copy/logic reuse only; 105 frontend tests green. The banding logic is already unit-tested in
compareLogic.test.ts.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
Batch C (points 7-10): - Point 7: the admissions section shows the first-choice offer rate but no sense of how severe a low rate is. Reuse the compare screen's banded summariseAdmissions ('More than half of first choices missed out' etc.) as an interpretive line under the tiles. (Selective/faith framing was already present via admissionsTag.) - Point 8: replace the jargon P8-suspended banner ('not used for accountability purposes ... treat with caution') with the compare screen's plain-English 'no KS2 baseline (COVID)' explanation. - Points 9 (disadvantaged cohort sizes) and 10 (FSM benchmark) don't apply to the detail page: it shows disadvantaged composition, not disadvantaged attainment, and no FSM-vs-benchmark comparison — so there's no small-cohort caveat or cross-definition fallback to fix here. - Also fixed a stray lowercase 'national avg' provenance string Batch B missed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB🤖 AI Code Review (Claude Code)
This PR adds a banded plain-English admissions summary chip to the primary school detail view (reusing summariseAdmissions from lib/compareLogic, same logic as the compare screen), renames a 'national avg' label to 'England avg' for provenance clarity, and rewords the Progress 8 suspension banner for 2024/25 to explain the COVID KS2 cause in plain English. All changes are additive/textual, the new function handles null admissions safely, and the referenced CSS class already exists.
✅ No issues found.