Batch C (points 7-10):
- Point 7: the admissions section shows the first-choice offer rate but no
sense of how severe a low rate is. Reuse the compare screen's banded
summariseAdmissions ('More than half of first choices missed out' etc.)
as an interpretive line under the tiles. (Selective/faith framing was
already present via admissionsTag.)
- Point 8: replace the jargon P8-suspended banner ('not used for
accountability purposes ... treat with caution') with the compare
screen's plain-English 'no KS2 baseline (COVID)' explanation.
- Points 9 (disadvantaged cohort sizes) and 10 (FSM benchmark) don't apply
to the detail page: it shows disadvantaged composition, not disadvantaged
attainment, and no FSM-vs-benchmark comparison — so there's no small-cohort
caveat or cross-definition fallback to fix here.
- Also fixed a stray lowercase 'national avg' provenance string Batch B
missed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
