Batch C (points 7-10):
- Point 7: the admissions section shows the first-choice offer rate but no
sense of how severe a low rate is. Reuse the compare screen's banded
summariseAdmissions ('More than half of first choices missed out' etc.)
as an interpretive line under the tiles. (Selective/faith framing was
already present via admissionsTag.)
- Point 8: replace the jargon P8-suspended banner ('not used for
accountability purposes ... treat with caution') with the compare
screen's plain-English 'no KS2 baseline (COVID)' explanation.
- Points 9 (disadvantaged cohort sizes) and 10 (FSM benchmark) don't apply
to the detail page: it shows disadvantaged composition, not disadvantaged
attainment, and no FSM-vs-benchmark comparison — so there's no small-cohort
caveat or cross-definition fallback to fix here.
- Also fixed a stray lowercase 'national avg' provenance string Batch B
missed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
Batch B (points 5-6): the detail page called every national figure a
'National avg'. All of them come from the official-DfE national-averages
marts (KS2/KS4 headlines), so they are England averages — relabel to
match the compare screen's provenance convention ('England average' for
official figures; the detail page has no computed benchmarks, so no
'state-school average (computed)' label is needed). Point 6 (anchoring
every number) is already satisfied on the detail page via DeltaChip.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
Batch A of applying compare-screen learnings to the detail page (points 2-3):
- Point 2: the legacy OEIF sub-judgement grid rendered any non-null value
via OFSTED_LABELS[value], so Ofsted's sentinel code 9 ('not applicable')
leaked as an undefined label, and the sixth-form judgement was dropped
entirely. New shared ofstedLegacyAreas() helper returns only real grades
(1-4) and includes Sixth Form provision. Both detail views + the
all-same-grade check use it.
- Point 3: the OEIF disclaimer always claimed 'Ofsted no longer makes an
overall judgement' even when showing a carried-forward grade. It's now
grade_source-aware and labels carried-forward grades as such, matching
the compare screen.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
Review fixes on the list/map report-card PR:
- e2e precondition now hard-asserts ofsted_rc_date instead of test.skip, so
the backend dropping the field fails loudly (that's the regression under
test), not silently skips.
- Use page_size=5 (the real backend param); per_page was ignored and fell
back to the default page size.
- Update buildOfstedListBadge docstring to describe the ofsted_rc_date-based,
report-card-wins-first detection instead of the removed framework check.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
The search-result cards and map pins keyed report-card detection off
ofsted_framework === 'ReportCard', but the API sets ofsted_framework to the
raw event grouping ('Schools - S5'); worse, ofsted_grade (the carried-forward
legacy grade) was checked first and won. So report-card schools were badged
by their old grade — Barclay's pin/card read 'Outstanding · 2021' instead of
'Report Card · 2026'. Same root cause as the detail-page fix, different
surface.
Expose ofsted_rc_date on the list serialization (the report-card inspection
date, non-null only for report cards) and make both badge builders treat a
present rc-date as winning over any grade, using its year. Removes the dead
framework === 'ReportCard' branches.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
The detail views detected report cards via ofsted.framework === 'ReportCard',
but the API sets framework to the raw event grouping ('Schools - S5') even
for report-card schools — so the check never matched: report-card schools
rendered as legacy 'Ofsted Rating' badges dated to a pre-Nov-2025
inspection (e.g. Barclay shown as 'Outstanding, Inspected 7 October 2021'
instead of its Feb 2026 report card).
Detect report cards by the presence of the report_card object (matching
the compare screen), and date them with rc_inspection_date, never the
legacy inspection_date. Applies to both primary and secondary detail views.
New e2e assertion against a real report-card school gates it.
Note: the list/map surface has the same latent issue via ofsted_framework
(LeafletMapInner) — flagged as a separate follow-up.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
Promotion's 'Verify the staging E2E gate' step called the Gitea
commit-status API with REGISTRY_TOKEN, which has container-registry scope
but no repository scope — so the API returned 403 and promotion failed.
Switch to the built-in GITHUB_TOKEN (repo read scope), matching how
pr-checks.yml already authenticates to the Gitea API. REGISTRY_TOKEN is
still used for the docker registry login, which is its correct scope.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
The link repeated the full school name ('Watford Grammar School for Boys's
Ofsted page') — long on mobile, and the colour-coded school name already
leads the row. Show just 'Ofsted page →'; keep the full name in aria-label
so screen readers can still tell the per-school links apart.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
The colour-coded school name that leads each row in a mobile measure card
was 0.8rem — a touch small to scan which school a value belongs to. Bump
to 0.9rem (with a matching 10px dot) so it's easier to read. Mobile only;
desktop uses the column header and hides this label.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
SF1 (expert sign-off): the secondary academics 'Grade 5+ in English &
maths' and 'EBacc entry' rows rendered as bare numbers — the one place
the 'every number anchored against the England average' promise broke.
Both now show the official England anchor (already in the payload) + an
Above/Close/Below verdict chip, matching Attainment 8 (which also gains a
chip for consistency).
Button affordance: globals.css has a duplicate .btn block whose
'border: none' overrode the base '1px solid transparent', so
.btn-secondary/.btn-active's 'border-color' had no width — every outline
button (the modal's '+ Compare', search-result '+ Compare', 'Comparing')
rendered as borderless teal text. Give the outline variants the full
'border' shorthand so the outline renders regardless of the clobbered base.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
The bottom-sheet overlay was position:fixed inset:0, sized to the LAYOUT
viewport, so when the mobile keyboard opened it kept full height: the
sheet (anchored to the overlay's bottom) and the lower half of the dim
backdrop sat behind the keyboard, hiding the search input and results.
Track window.visualViewport (height + offsetTop) while the modal is open
and pin the overlay to the visible region, so backdrop and sheet stay
above the keyboard. Size the sheet against the overlay (max-height:100%,
min-height:min(55vh,100%)) instead of vh, and drop the results list's own
inner scroll on mobile so the sheet is a single scroll area.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
The 'add school' modal passed no title to Modal, so its header held only
the close button — shoved to the far left by justify-content:space-between
in an otherwise-empty bar — while the real title was rendered separately
inside the content. Pass the title to Modal so the header reads title
(left) + close (right), and drop the duplicate in-content heading.
Also: the mobile full-width result button targeted a dead .addButton
selector (the button never had that class), so it rendered inconsistently
— give the button a real module class and full width on mobile, tighten
the stacked cards, and give the bottom sheet a stable min-height so its
empty state isn't a tiny stub.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
The chart note (and the 2-row mobile chip legend) lived inside the fixed
360px/420px chartBox and competed with the canvas for it, so a longer
caption — e.g. the new KS4 gap note — shrank the mobile canvas to ~178px
and tripped the e2e >220px guard. The canvas now owns a definite height
(280px mobile / 380px desktop) with chips above and the note flowing
below at natural size, so neither can eat the plot. Verified on staging:
patched canvas renders 280px vs the squashed 178px.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
Review findings: (1) the 'no KS2 baseline (COVID)' explanation was derived
from the basket-wide max year, so a school with an unrelated data gap
borrowed it from a neighbour with 2024/25 data — now judged per school on
its own latest year. (2) The '~N disadvantaged pupils' cohort multiplied
eligible_pupils and disadvantaged_pct resolved independently across years
— now both come from the same yearly row that supplies the displayed
percentage.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
S1: first-choice chip banded (More than half / About 1 in 3 / Over 1 in 4
missed out) so a 44%-offered grammar isn't understated by half.
S2: Progress 8 explains its absence for 2024/25+ cohorts (no KS2 baseline,
COVID) instead of a bare 'No data'.
S3: KS4 trend charts get their own honest gap caption (2019/20-2020/21
unpublished; later years not in our dataset yet); y-axis 'Value'→'Score';
buildCompareChart exposes englandOnlyYears.
S4: all-through schools labelled in chips, rail caption says 'N schools ·
<phase> view' for mixed baskets, whole-school roll no longer judged
against the single-phase median, community section carries an all-ages
caveat.
S6 (spec §8.5): disadvantaged attainment shows the cohort behind it
('of ~50 disadvantaged pupils').
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
The DAG's dbt --select list predates the official-KS4-nationals stream,
so the extract loaded raw.ees_ks4_national but the staging model and
fact_ks4_national_averages were never rebuilt — staging kept serving the
old computed means after the DAG run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
M1: admissions rounds are now selected by the active phase tab
(admissionsForPhase) — an all-through school's Year 7 round no longer
masquerades as Reception odds beside pure primaries; honest per-cell and
section fallbacks name the round (Reception / Year 7).
M2: Ofsted sentinel codes (9 = not applicable) never render as judgement
chips, and the sixth-form judgement — previously dropped — now renders
for schools that have one.
M3: 'What this means' is phase- and type-aware: selective schools get
entrance-test framing, secondary faith schools a faith-criteria note, and
the primaries' distance template never appears on the secondary tab
(admissions_policy now exposed in compare school_info).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
Review finding: merging left a re-added school's old entry in the map
forever, so the covered check served stale data and the map grew
unboundedly. The cancelled flag already discards superseded responses,
which is the actual race fix; replacing keeps the map bounded to the
current selection and guarantees fresh refetches.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
Opening a compare link while localStorage held a different basket raced a
fetch for the OLD school set against the URL's SSR data; the stale
response replaced comparisonData, so no active school had data and every
section (including the trends chart) vanished until a hard refresh.
Responses from superseded effect runs are now dropped, successful ones
merge instead of replace, and the URL-seed effect re-runs when a
client-side navigation changes ?urns=.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
'COMPARING / 3 primary schools' — 0.72rem uppercase eyebrow over a
0.95rem semibold count, sized to sit alongside the 0.92rem chip names
without dominating. Desktop only; mobile pills unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
The bar was a plain flex row while sections use a 200px-label + per-school
grid, so chips drifted off the columns they label. The bar now shares the
sections' grid template (via --school-count) at the same 761px breakpoint;
verified pixel-exact against live section columns (236/615/994). Mobile
pills unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
Swept in accidentally by a broad 'git add pipeline'. They embed local
absolute paths and a personal usage-tracking UUID, and a stale committed
manifest causes partial-parse/version-mismatch noise for others.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
The final review claimed DfE published school-level 2021/22 KS2 in Dec
2022. Re-verified: the GOV.UK announcement 'Primary school performance
tables: 2022' is CANCELLED ('will not be published in key stage 2
performance tables in academic year 2021/22'), and the EES 2021/22
release carries the same statement. No code change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
New ees_ks4_national stream ingests the EES 'National characteristics
summary data' series (England, state-funded, all pupils). The old mart's
unweighted school means were 7-15 points off every headline measure and
produced an impossible national Progress 8 (-0.27). The API's computed
fallback is gone too: the footnote calls these figures official, so an
unbuilt mart now yields an empty series, never a stand-in.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
The FSM chip anchored against disadvantaged_pct (a different measure,
FSM6+CLA) whenever fsm_pct was null — which it always was, since the
performance df has no fsm_pct. New fact_census_benchmarks mart supplies
pupil-weighted FSM/EAL means per phase; the KS2-column medians that
produced a bogus 50% 'secondary disadvantaged' anchor are gone.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
The MI file's report-card grade columns belong to the latest FULL
inspection (col 'Inspection start date'), but inspection_date maps to the
legacy OEIF graded/ungraded dates — so report cards were being dated with
pre-Nov-2025 inspections. Also discover_csv_url() returned matches[0],
the oldest (2017) link on the GOV.UK page.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
tudor