fix(home): correct education/Ofsted claims on the landing page #73

Merged

tudor merged 3 commits from fix/homepage-education-accuracy into main 2026-07-21 09:04:57 +00:00

Conversation 3 Commits 3 Files Changed 4

+109 -35

3 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
TudorandClaude Opus 4.8	22e9eb2d48	fix(home): make Att8 bar match its numbers and separate safeguarding ... Two internal-consistency fixes on the "What you'll see" mock: - The Attainment 8 bar had drifted from the numbers beside it (fill 68% / line 57% vs a 54.8 score and 45.9 national avg). Restored the mock's original 1:1 value-to-percent mapping: fill 54.8%, national line 45.9%. - The report card grouped "Safeguarding: Met" in the same five-point list as the graded areas, but safeguarding is a separate binary met/not-met judgement under the real framework. Moved it below the list behind a divider, with an outlined chip and a "separate check" label so it no longer reads as a graded area. Verified with tsc --noEmit and next build. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB	2026-07-21 10:01:10 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 4.8	13253116c2	fix(home): correct remaining KS2/Ofsted terminology on the landing page ... Follow-up to the accuracy pass — the medium-severity wording issues from the same expert review: - KS2 "Exceeding" isn't a DfE term. The above-expected level is the "higher standard" for the reading and maths tests and "greater depth" for teacher-assessed writing. Labelled per subject, and brought the illustrative reading value down from an implausible 73% (national higher standard is ~29%) to a realistic strong-school figure. - Attributed inspection outcomes to Ofsted, not only the DfE (Ofsted is a separate non-ministerial department). - Hero: "2026/2027 admissions results" -> "the 2026/27 admissions round" (admissions produce offers, not results, and we don't hold per-school offer outcomes). Tightened .miniRowHead so the longer "Greater depth" label stays on one line and the three subject columns keep their bars aligned (the visual is desktop-only; hidden on mobile). Verified with tsc --noEmit and next build. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB	2026-07-21 09:07:23 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 4.8	1b8adb91ee	fix(home): correct education/Ofsted claims on the landing page ... Homepage marketing content had drifted from both the current education regime and the app's own school pages. An expert accuracy review surfaced five issues (3 critical, 2 high): - Ofsted card showed a single "OUTSTANDING" word-grade. Overall grades were abolished (Sept 2024) and inspections now produce a report card on a five-point scale (from Nov 2025). Rebuilt the card as a report card with per-area ratings + stand-alone safeguarding, matching what CompareOfsted actually renders on a school page. - Attainment 8 "National avg 50.2" was wrong; the real 2024/25 figure is 45.9. Corrected the benchmark and the illustrative school value. - Compare mock featured a KS2 "Reading progress" score, but KS2 progress isn't published for 2023/24 or 2024/25 (no post-COVID KS1 baseline). Swapped for Higher standard (RWM), which is published. - Editorial called it "UK school performance data"; the data is England-only. Now matches the hero and page metadata. - Softened the "40-page inspection report" exaggeration. Landing-page copy isn't covered by e2e journeys, so no test changes. Verified with tsc --noEmit and next build. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB	2026-07-21 09:00:02 +01:00