Files
school_compare/nextjs-app/components/compare
TudorandClaude Fable 5 f3fa12806b
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 49s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 3m8s
fix(compare): expert should-fixes S1-S4, S6 — banded chips, P8 reason, KS4 gap caption, all-through framing, cohort sizes
S1: first-choice chip banded (More than half / About 1 in 3 / Over 1 in 4
missed out) so a 44%-offered grammar isn't understated by half.
S2: Progress 8 explains its absence for 2024/25+ cohorts (no KS2 baseline,
COVID) instead of a bare 'No data'.
S3: KS4 trend charts get their own honest gap caption (2019/20-2020/21
unpublished; later years not in our dataset yet); y-axis 'Value'→'Score';
buildCompareChart exposes englandOnlyYears.
S4: all-through schools labelled in chips, rail caption says 'N schools ·
<phase> view' for mixed baskets, whole-school roll no longer judged
against the single-phase median, community section carries an all-ages
caveat.
S6 (spec §8.5): disadvantaged attainment shows the cohort behind it
('of ~50 disadvantaged pupils').

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
2026-07-17 17:41:12 +01:00
..