TudorandClaude Opus 5
cbe3a9a772
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 8s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 18s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 45s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 1m14s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 9s
The Share column keyed off `percentage === null`, which is true for not_applicable as well as suppressed, so a destination that does not apply to the school was labelled as one DfE withheld — while the Pupils column in the same row rendered blank. Two columns, one row, disagreeing about what the row was, and one of them making a claim about DfE that wasn't true. Both columns now derive from `status`, which is the distinction the mart, the SQLAlchemy model and the serialiser all preserve deliberately: published shows the figure, suppressed shows the withheld badge, not_applicable shows an em-dash with a title saying so. A published count with no published percentage now derives its share from the cohort rather than falling through to a marker — both halves are published, so nothing withheld is involved, and it is the same derivation the bar widths already use. Verified the new tests fail against the old logic before keeping them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BvdDKvFFSZuMVDH5fEyTob