Files
school_compare/nextjs-app/__tests__/lib/lastDistanceOffered.test.ts
T
TudorandClaude Opus 5.5 ef4a2ccccb fix(school): send the school page its admissions policy, and read it exactly
The header's Selective flag read school_info.admissions_policy, which the
detail endpoint never sent, so no school page could flag Selective while
its search row did (staging E2E: The Grammar School at Leeds). The detail
payload now carries it, and a contract test checks it carries every field
the header's flags read.

Sending it would have switched on two older copies of the tag logic #176
fixed in the rows. The Admissions section and the cut-off note both tested
includes('selective'), so every non-selective secondary would have read
"entry is by selective examination". The section also counted "None" as a
faith: Burntwood reads "a faith-based admissions priority (None)" today.
All of them now share isSelective() and hasReligiousCharacter(), which also
treats "Not applicable" as no faith, as the place table already does.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 23:43:43 +01:00

190 lines
8.1 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* Last distance offered — formatting and the caveats attached to the figure.
*
* The assertions about the route note and the year are not cosmetic. A cut-off
* shown without its year, or a banded school's widest cut-off shown as if it
* were the only one, tells a parent something false about their chances of a
* place — so both are pinned here rather than left to the component.
*/
import { formatCutoffDistance, formatMiles, formatEntryYear } from '@/lib/utils';
import {
describeCutoff, describeCutoffAbsence, compareToCutoff, CUTOFF_UNCERTAINTY_M,
} from '@/components/school/lastDistanceOffered';
import type { SchoolAdmissionDistance } from '@/lib/types';
const distance = (over: Partial<SchoolAdmissionDistance> = {}): SchoolAdmissionDistance => ({
year: 2025,
distance_m: 500,
route_count: 1,
la_name: 'Camden',
distance_unit_raw: 'miles',
...over,
});
describe('formatCutoffDistance', () => {
it('leads with miles, the unit councils publish in', () => {
expect(formatCutoffDistance(500)).toEqual({ primary: '0.31 miles', secondary: '500 m' });
expect(formatCutoffDistance(1609.344)).toEqual({ primary: '1.00 miles', secondary: '1.6 km' });
});
it('switches to kilometres for the support figure above a kilometre', () => {
expect(formatCutoffDistance(3472.96)!.secondary).toBe('3.5 km');
});
it('stays in miles at short range, where it used to swap to metres', () => {
// The swap made a single number easier to read and a comparison harder:
// "69 m away — inside the cut-off of 0.17 miles" asked the reader to
// convert between units to check a claim we had already made for them.
expect(formatCutoffDistance(27)).toEqual({ primary: '0.02 miles', secondary: '30 m' });
expect(formatCutoffDistance(69)!.primary).toMatch(/miles$/);
});
it('describes a distance too short for two decimal places', () => {
// Rather than a flat "0.00 miles", which reads as no distance at all.
expect(formatMiles(5)).toBe('under 0.01 miles');
expect(formatMiles(0)).toBe('under 0.01 miles');
expect(formatMiles(20)).toBe('0.01 miles');
});
it('returns null rather than a zero cut-off', () => {
// 0.0 miles appears in the source where a school filled on a higher
// criterion. Rendered as "0.00 miles" it would read as the opposite.
expect(formatCutoffDistance(0)).toBeNull();
expect(formatCutoffDistance(null)).toBeNull();
expect(formatCutoffDistance(undefined)).toBeNull();
expect(formatCutoffDistance(Number.NaN)).toBeNull();
});
});
describe('formatEntryYear', () => {
it('names the intake, not the academic year', () => {
// formatAcademicYear would render 2025 as "2025/26", which reads as a
// school year rather than the September a child started.
expect(formatEntryYear(2025)).toBe('September 2025');
expect(formatEntryYear(null)).toBe('');
});
});
describe('describeCutoff', () => {
it('always carries the entry year alongside the figure', () => {
const d = describeCutoff(distance({ distance_m: 772.49, year: 2024 }));
expect(d).not.toBeNull();
expect(d!.primary).toBe('0.48 miles');
expect(d!.entryYear).toBe('September 2024');
});
it('says nothing about routes for a school with one', () => {
expect(describeCutoff(distance({ route_count: 1 }))!.routeNote).toBeNull();
expect(describeCutoff(distance({ route_count: null }))!.routeNote).toBeNull();
});
it('warns that a banded school\'s figure is the widest of several', () => {
const note = describeCutoff(distance({ route_count: 4 }))!.routeNote;
expect(note).toContain('4 admission routes');
expect(note).toContain('shorter cut-off');
});
it('is null when there is nothing publishable', () => {
expect(describeCutoff(null)).toBeNull();
expect(describeCutoff(undefined)).toBeNull();
expect(describeCutoff(distance({ distance_m: null }))).toBeNull();
});
});
// ── "Would we have got in?" ────────────────────────────────────────────
describe('compareToCutoff', () => {
it('never states the two figures in different units', () => {
/*
* The reported defect: "69 m away — inside the September 2026 cut-off of
* 0.17 miles". Both numbers are correct and the sentence is still useless,
* because checking it means converting one of them.
*
* Swept across the range where the old formatter switched units, so a
* future readability tweak to one figure cannot reintroduce the mismatch
* in the other.
*/
const mixed: string[] = [];
for (const homeM of [0, 5, 27, 69, 99, 100, 260, 800, 1609, 5000]) {
for (const cutoffM of [30, 69, 100, 270, 1000, 3500]) {
const { headline } = compareToCutoff(homeM, cutoffM, 2026);
const hasMetres = /\d\s?m\b/.test(headline);
const milesCount = (headline.match(/miles/g) ?? []).length;
// Two figures, both in miles, and no metric reading anywhere near them.
if (hasMetres || milesCount !== 2) {
mixed.push(`home=${homeM}m cutoff=${cutoffM}m -> ${headline}`);
}
}
}
expect(mixed).toEqual([]);
});
it('reads back the reported case in one unit', () => {
expect(compareToCutoff(69, 270, 2026).headline)
.toBe('0.04 miles away, inside the September 2026 cut-off of 0.17 miles.');
});
it('calls a clearly nearer home inside, and names the year', () => {
const r = compareToCutoff(300, 800, 2026);
expect(r.verdict).toBe('inside');
expect(r.headline).toContain('September 2026');
});
it('calls a clearly further home beyond', () => {
expect(compareToCutoff(4000, 800, 2026).verdict).toBe('outside');
});
it('refuses to call a result inside the measurement error, either way', () => {
// A postcode centroid covers several addresses, so a margin this fine is
// noise. With one published year there is no other year to fall back on,
// which makes this band the only thing standing between a parent and a
// place they do not have.
expect(compareToCutoff(800 - CUTOFF_UNCERTAINTY_M / 2, 800, 2026).verdict).toBe('too-close');
expect(compareToCutoff(800 + CUTOFF_UNCERTAINTY_M / 2, 800, 2026).verdict).toBe('too-close');
expect(compareToCutoff(800, 800, 2026).detail).toContain('measurement error');
// The explanation is not welded to the headline, so it does not run at
// headline weight in the result block.
expect(compareToCutoff(800, 800, 2026).headline).not.toContain('measurement error');
expect(compareToCutoff(300, 800, 2026).detail).toBeNull();
});
it('treats the band as exclusive at its edge', () => {
// Exactly on the boundary is still too close; one metre past it is not.
expect(compareToCutoff(800 - CUTOFF_UNCERTAINTY_M, 800, 2026).verdict).toBe('too-close');
expect(compareToCutoff(800 - CUTOFF_UNCERTAINTY_M - 1, 800, 2026).verdict).toBe('inside');
});
});
describe('describeCutoffAbsence', () => {
it('does not read "Non-selective" as selective', () => {
// A substring test matched "selective" inside "Non-selective".
const s = describeCutoffAbsence({ localAuthority: 'Wandsworth', admissionsPolicy: 'Non-selective' });
expect(s).not.toMatch(/entrance test/);
expect(s).toMatch(/^Wandsworth has not published/);
});
it('explains a selective school by how it admits, not as missing data', () => {
const s = describeCutoffAbsence({ localAuthority: 'Kent', admissionsPolicy: 'Selective' });
expect(s).toContain('entrance test');
expect(s).not.toContain('has not published');
});
it('reads a consistently undersubscribed school as good news', () => {
const s = describeCutoffAbsence({
localAuthority: 'Camden',
admissionsHistory: [
{ year: 2022, oversubscribed: false },
{ year: 2023, oversubscribed: false },
{ year: 2024, oversubscribed: false },
],
});
expect(s).toContain('has not needed a distance cut-off');
});
it('otherwise names the authority that would hold the figure', () => {
expect(describeCutoffAbsence({ localAuthority: 'Camden' }))
.toContain('Camden has not published');
});
});