TudorandClaude Opus 4.8
1b8adb91ee
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 12s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 42s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 37s
Homepage marketing content had drifted from both the current education regime and the app's own school pages. An expert accuracy review surfaced five issues (3 critical, 2 high): - Ofsted card showed a single "OUTSTANDING" word-grade. Overall grades were abolished (Sept 2024) and inspections now produce a report card on a five-point scale (from Nov 2025). Rebuilt the card as a report card with per-area ratings + stand-alone safeguarding, matching what CompareOfsted actually renders on a school page. - Attainment 8 "National avg 50.2" was wrong; the real 2024/25 figure is 45.9. Corrected the benchmark and the illustrative school value. - Compare mock featured a KS2 "Reading progress" score, but KS2 progress isn't published for 2023/24 or 2024/25 (no post-COVID KS1 baseline). Swapped for Higher standard (RWM), which is published. - Editorial called it "UK school performance data"; the data is England-only. Now matches the hero and page metadata. - Softened the "40-page inspection report" exaggeration. Landing-page copy isn't covered by e2e journeys, so no test changes. Verified with tsc --noEmit and next build. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB