TudorandClaude Opus 4.8
733faefb98
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 11s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 48s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 43s
Final Ofsted/education-expert review of the detail page (Batch F) found one
clarity gap: on an all-through school the Admissions block shows a single
entry point's figures (Hessle's are the Year 7 secondary intake —
admissions.school_phase = "Secondary") but is titled just "Admissions", so a
parent interested in the reception/primary intake could read the Year 7
numbers as the whole school.
Add a phase subtitle for all-through schools ("These figures are for secondary
entry (Year 7)." / "...primary entry (Reception)."). Pure-primary and
pure-secondary pages are unambiguous and unchanged.
Rest of the review verified correct against source payloads: all three Ofsted
regimes (report card / ungraded post-Sept-2024 / carried-forward), England-
average anchoring, gap-honest trend charts (KS2 + KS4), all-through dual-phase
rendering, and the mobile layout.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB