TudorandClaude Opus 5 cd1c5d1e1a docs: revise the spec to the design that survived staging ...

The spec described the tier system as the design of record. It is gone, so
the document was describing something the code deliberately does not do.

The revision note and the "why not, having built it the other way first"
passage are kept rather than overwritten. The mistake is the instructive part:
treating a preference as a constraint inverted the ranking, and the stopping
rule added to prevent weak distant matches is what guaranteed six Catholic
schools and no community school down the road. A spec that quietly presents the
second design as the plan teaches nobody why the first one failed.

The mockup link is annotated as one revision behind rather than silently left
to look current.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-09-22 13:06:32 +01:00

..

superpowers

docs: revise the spec to the design that survived staging

2026-09-22 13:06:32 +01:00

ARCHITECTURE.md

refactor: rename similar → nearby, so the code says what the section does

2026-09-22 13:06:32 +01:00

branch-cleanup-2026-08-20.txt

chore: record the branch cleanup manifest

2026-08-20 23:23:30 +01:00

DEPLOY.md

fix(ci): make a failed release check say what it actually saw

2026-09-15 16:02:14 +01:00

DEVELOPMENT.md

feat(ci): gate promotion on the image set that actually passed E2E

2026-09-15 10:17:50 +01:00

LEGACY_CODE.md

chore: remove the code the legacy CSV importer left behind

2026-09-14 23:01:22 +01:00