The Share column keyed off `percentage === null`, which is true for
not_applicable as well as suppressed, so a destination that does not apply
to the school was labelled as one DfE withheld — while the Pupils column
in the same row rendered blank. Two columns, one row, disagreeing about
what the row was, and one of them making a claim about DfE that wasn't
true.
Both columns now derive from `status`, which is the distinction the mart,
the SQLAlchemy model and the serialiser all preserve deliberately:
published shows the figure, suppressed shows the withheld badge,
not_applicable shows an em-dash with a title saying so.
A published count with no published percentage now derives its share from
the cohort rather than falling through to a marker — both halves are
published, so nothing withheld is involved, and it is the same derivation
the bar widths already use.
Verified the new tests fail against the old logic before keeping them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BvdDKvFFSZuMVDH5fEyTob
Question cards over one bar, with the cards acting as a lens on the bar
rather than a summary beside it — focusing a card dims everything it is
not made of, so the grouping we chose is inspectable rather than asserted.
The bar renders only when canRenderBar allows it. Where a category is
withheld the section says so and shows the table instead: the categories
sum to the cohort, so a bar drawn from the published segments leaves a
gap whose width is the withheld figure.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BvdDKvFFSZuMVDH5fEyTob