d8ccb5b73389b92bedbc1bb5a824132e8fc1f87b
8
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
d1358cc00f |
fix(places): phase links must stay in their own namespace
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 8s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 17s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 44s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 2m37s
Every place page built its phase links as /schools/[slug]/[phase], the shape that belongs to towns alone. On an authority page that pointed into the town namespace. For 87 of the 151 authorities the target does not exist and the link 404s; for the other 64 it resolves to the town of the same name — a different set of schools, which is precisely the near-duplicate the two namespaces were introduced to prevent. On an outcode page it 404s outright. Two causes behind it, both a rule written twice and inherited by only one of the places that needed it. The authority phase route was in the spec and dropped by the plan, which built the three bare routes and no fourth. The sitemap is generated from the place registry, which was right about them all along, so 302 authority phase URLs have been submitted to Google and every one 404s. Adding the route makes the sitemap true and serves a real query — admissions are authority-run, so "primary schools in Kent" is how a parent searches before they have settled on a town. The outcode variants were the opposite: the registry computed phases for outcodes although the spec gives them no route, and the sitemap knew to skip them while the API did not. The registry now decides alone, and the sitemap's duplicate of that rule is gone. Also: an authority under the five-school threshold has no page, so the API sends a null slug for it and the page names it without linking. Two English authorities are in that position. It was unreachable in today's data — verified across the EC and TR outcodes — but the thin place redirect would have sent a reader to a 404 the year it isn't. The e2e journey now walks every /schools link a page of each family emits and requires a 200, which is the check that was missing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015mWQnpye9F299NVRCCSRvj |
||
|
|
9cc87c41bb |
fix(places): a phase page needs results, not merely publishable schools
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 8s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 16s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 44s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 2m4s
Asked where schools with no results should sit in an alphabetical list, and found that some pages were almost entirely made of them. The per-phase threshold counted schools that were publishable — a result OR an Ofsted grade — while a phase page exists for its results column. /schools/kent/primary published with none of its five rows carrying a result; Minehead had one of seven, Buntingford one of five. Forty-four phase pages were majority-blank. It is the same rule as "no page without a local average", which was written into the spec as a thin-page control and never extended per phase. The threshold now counts schools with a result for that phase. It gates whether the page exists; it does not filter rows — a page that publishes still lists every school of the phase, because someone looking up a school by name has to find it whether or not it published results. 126 of 1,012 variant pages stop publishing: 62 primary, 64 secondary. Every one of them was a table with too little in it to be worth a page. The ordering itself is unchanged: pure A-Z, blanks interleaved. A school sits where its name says it does, and at roughly a tenth of rows that reads fine. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015mWQnpye9F299NVRCCSRvj |
||
|
|
bb2f7a5841 |
fix(places): address review, and merge places GIAS spells more than one way
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 8s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 17s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 44s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 2m34s
Two findings from review on #121, plus a third the review prompted. The cap at three authorities silently dropped the fourth in exactly the case where the information matters most — a genuinely fragmented place — and contradicted the stated goal of naming every authority a place sits in. It is gone. The share rule was always the real limit and already bounds the list at ten. Measured against the live corpus, one town would have been truncated today: LONDON, split evenly between Hackney, Lambeth, Westminster and Lewisham. parent_authority used mode() while authorities used value_counts(), and on an exact tie pandas does not guarantee the two pick the same name, so the 301 could have pointed somewhere other than the authority named first on the page. The parent is now derived from authorities[0]: one computation, one answer. It also inherits the sentinel filter, so a place can no longer redirect to /schools/authority/does-not-apply. Chasing the truncation case surfaced a worse bug. Places were grouped by raw town value, but the registry is keyed by slug, and GIAS spells the same place several ways. Five town slugs come from more than one spelling: "London" (1,819 schools) and "LONDON" (12) both slugify to `london`, so the later group simply overwrote the earlier one — /schools/london could have shown twelve schools, silently, depending on row order. Weston-super-Mare was split 14/19 across two spellings and Newcastle-under-Lyme across three. Grouping is now by slug, and the display name is the most common spelling. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015mWQnpye9F299NVRCCSRvj |
||
|
|
1cb5314c53 |
feat(places): name every authority a place sits in
SW19 is mostly Merton but partly Wandsworth, and the page said only Merton. The cause was one field doing two jobs: _parent_authority takes the modal authority, which is right for a 301 target and wrong as a statement about where a place is. This is not a corner case. A quarter of viable outcodes (425 of 1,760) and a third of viable towns (263 of 783) cross an authority boundary — Bedford the town spans Bedford and Central Bedfordshire. Place now carries `authorities`, every authority holding at least a tenth of the schools and at least two of them, largest first. parent_authority stays single and unchanged, because a redirect still needs one target. The share threshold exists because GIAS carries postcode errors: EN6 lists two Shropshire schools among fourteen in Hertfordshire, and a bare "any authority present" rule would print those as though they were real. A place too small or too fragmented to clear the threshold still names its largest, so the page never goes silent about where it is. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015mWQnpye9F299NVRCCSRvj |
||
|
|
6f749ed21f |
fix(places): submit and link the phase variants
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 8s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 17s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 45s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Failing after 2m39s
/schools/[place]/[phase] shipped as routes but reached nothing. The sitemap emitted one URL per registry entry and the registry had no phase dimension, so ~950 pages were absent from every sitemap — and PlaceView did not link them either, leaving them reachable by nothing at all. That is the query shape the baseline actually showed: 'primary schools in beccles', 'secondary schools in brentwood'. Publishing the routes without a path in meant building for the demand and then hiding from it. Place now carries phase_urns so the per-phase threshold can be applied without re-querying, the sitemap emits a variant wherever a phase clears the threshold on its own, and the API exposes the qualifying phases so the place page links only variants that exist. Outcodes are excluded: nobody searches 'primary schools in SW11' and those routes do not exist. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015mWQnpye9F299NVRCCSRvj |
||
|
|
d3c63ccc6d |
fix(places): a locality collision must not break the sitemap
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m4s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 8s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 18s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 45s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 34s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 34s
Sitemap regeneration failed on staging. 'richmond' in the curated locality list collides with the GIAS town Richmond in North Yorkshire (37 schools), the registry raised, and the admin endpoint 500d — taking down sitemap generation for all 25,000 school pages over one bad row of curated data. The guard now skips the colliding locality and logs an error. Skipping still achieves what the guard was for — a locality never silently shadows a town — without letting curated data break the site. That matters beyond this bug: GIAS town names change with no code change here, so a raise could fire spontaneously in production later. Also removes four localities that were London boroughs rather than districts. Hackney, Islington, Greenwich and Ealing are local authorities with 104, 72, 108 and 115 schools and already have authority pages; a locality defined by two or three outcodes would have been a partial near-duplicate of one — the thin-content failure the two-namespace design exists to avoid. A test now guards the whole borough list. Validated against the live corpus: 15 localities, no town collisions, no authority duplicates, all 15 clear the threshold. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015mWQnpye9F299NVRCCSRvj |
||
|
|
de853b90b3 |
feat(places): London localities and postcode districts
The GIAS town field puts 1,819 London schools under the single value 'London', so it cannot answer 'schools in Battersea' — a query that appears in the baseline. No single field can: parliamentary constituency gives Battersea but not Canary Wharf, admin_ward gives Canary Wharf but not Battersea, and neither gives Clapham or Shoreditch. So a locality is curated, defined by the postcode districts it covers, which needs no new ingestion. A locality may not shadow a published town: the registry raises rather than silently costing a page that carries real demand. One below the threshold is logged rather than raising, because a locality can legitimately be too small. The pipeline seed mirrors the module, with a test guarding the drift — the same arrangement gias_codes has, and for the same reason: the backend image does not contain pipeline/. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015mWQnpye9F299NVRCCSRvj |
||
|
|
759d9f5cea |
feat(places): registry of towns and authorities
Two namespaces because 67 town names collide with an authority name and neither set contains the other — postal towns cross authority boundaries, so Bedford the town holds 104 schools against the authority's 86. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015mWQnpye9F299NVRCCSRvj |