10 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
TudorandClaude Opus 5	2b4cf20d75	feat(destinations): the post-16 section, replacing the placeholder ... The 'Post-16 destination data coming soon' note is deleted rather than reworded: for a school with no sixth form the truthful statement is that the question does not apply, and a placeholder there implies something is missing. hasSixthForm and .sixthFormNote go with it — nothing else used them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BvdDKvFFSZuMVDH5fEyTob	2026-08-28 16:15:21 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	c9a1892bfb	feat(admissions): publish the latest cut-off only, holding history back ... Earlier years are to become a paid feature, so they stop being published. The load-bearing part is that this is a change to the API, not only to the page. /api/schools/{urn} is public and unauthenticated: leaving admission_distance_history in the payload while declining to render it would have handed the whole record to anyone who opened the network tab. It is withheld at the source, and the page follows. Nothing changes upstream. The tap, the plausibility band and fact_admission_distance are untouched and still load every published year, so restoring history for entitled callers is a change to one function in data_loader rather than a re-collection. What the reader now gets is the latest figure on the Admissions tile, and a Distance section that answers the question the number alone cannot: whether their own address falls inside it. Retitled to "How far away are you?", which is what it now does — the previous title described a record that is no longer there. Removed with the history: the trend chart, the year-by-year table, the per-year verdict strip, the trend summary and the coverage note, along with their CSS. The section goes from 743px to 417px. One consequence worth naming. A run of years used to soften a single close call — a home just outside one year's cut-off was usually inside another. With one year published, the "too close to call" band is the entire safety margin between a parent and a place they do not have, so the verdict now names its year, and the three outcomes are tinted apart rather than distinguished by wording alone. The existing stylesheet test earned its keep here: the three verdict classes were referenced before they were written, and it caught them. Unstyled, a "beyond the cut-off" result would have been indistinguishable from an "inside" one — the exact failure the longhand class map was written to prevent. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WDvkyqqHABm4bmth2kjAxE	2026-08-20 18:44:57 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	94151c58ea	fix(admissions): move the cut-off detail into its own section ... The admissions card measured 1503px on a live school page — half the height of every section put together, and nearly three times the next largest — with its default view rendering as four tiles adrift in about 1080px of blank card. The cause was a layout trick meeting content it was never sized for. The admissions views are stacked in one grid cell so switching them never shifts layout, and the hidden ones keep their box: only visibility is dropped. That works while the views are comparable. The distance view added in #102 carries a chart, a table and a map, came to 1402px against the tile grid's 316px, and pinned every other view to its height — including the one that renders by default, which nobody had clicked. Rather than only unpinning it, the detail moves out. Every other topic on the page is a section with a nav entry, and "how close did we need to live, and would we have got in?" is a topic, not a variant reading of the intake figures. The headline number stays on the Admissions tile where the intake story is; the record behind it now lives in a Distance section directly below. admissions 1503px -> 554px distance new -> 743px (median section on the page is ~528px) Three further changes, each of which also makes the content better rather than only shorter: * The map renders on request. Before a postcode is entered it is a circle drawn round a school, and it costs a Leaflet bundle and 240px to say so; a successful check opens it automatically, which is the point at which it starts answering something. Map height 320px -> 240px. * The chart appears only at the four published years that let the summary state a direction. Below that we already refuse to call the series a trend, and a line through three points asserts one regardless of what the sentence beneath it admits. The table carries those years anyway, with the reasons a line cannot show. * Three caveat paragraphs become one. They said walking-route twice and made the same point about priorities in two voices. It now sits in CutoffDistanceDetail rather than inside the check, so it still renders for a school with coordinates missing, where there is a table but no map and no check. The new e2e guard asserts no section exceeds 2.5x the median section height. Measuring the card's internals cannot catch this: the tile grid is flex: 1, so it absorbs the stretch and every box still looks full. The first version of this test targeted an arbitrary primary, passed against the live bug, and proved nothing; pointed at a school that actually holds cut-off history it fails on staging with "#admissions is 1459px against a 526px median". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WDvkyqqHABm4bmth2kjAxE	2026-08-20 14:54:02 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	a72323874f	feat(admissions): add the cut-off history, map and postcode check ... Completes the last-distance-offered feature against the mockup: the year-by-year record, the same numbers drawn over real streets, and the reader's own address measured against them. Serving the history The first cut deliberately served only the latest year, because a plain series would draw a trend line straight through gaps that are absences of publication, not of a cut-off. That reasoning is answered rather than abandoned: cutoffYearRows classifies every year in the span, and the chart breaks the line rather than interpolating across it. A missing year is not one fact but three. It may be unpublished; it may be a year the school was not oversubscribed; or there may be no record at all. Collapsing them into "no data" throws away the reassuring case and hides the important caveat, so each is stated in words in the table. The claim is held to what the data supports. fact_admissions.oversubscribed compares FIRST PREFERENCES against places, which does not establish that every applicant was offered one — so the copy says "places available on first preferences" and a test asserts the stronger claim never appears. The trend summary is not a verdict It names both endpoints and their years and lets the reader conclude. It is withheld below four published points, and a swing under a tenth of the earlier figure is reported as "broadly the same" rather than dressed up as a direction. The postcode check This is the only place on the site that answers a question about a family rather than a school, so most of the care went into what it refuses to say. postcodes.io returns a centroid covering roughly fifteen addresses, which against a 500 m cut-off is a fifth of the whole distance — so a margin inside 100 m returns "too close to call" rather than a place a family does not have. Unpublished years count as unknown, never as a pass. The limits are stated before the check is used, not revealed with the answer. The postcode is geocoded in the browser and never stored. Both templates Banded and selective secondaries are exactly where this matters most, so the detail is shared. The primary page gives it a third tab; the secondary page is one flat panel by design and renders it inline. Absence is explained rather than reported. A selective school's missing figure is explained by how it admits; a consistently undersubscribed school reads as good news. Also makes the batch loader's test double honour ORDER BY. It was a no-op, so "latest row per URN" was really "first row in the fixture" and the test would have passed with the sort reversed or removed. Verified: 214 frontend tests, 54 backend, 45/53 e2e green against staging (the 8 cut-off journeys skip until the DAG runs). Rendered offline against the real compiled CSS in both themes and at 390px; every new surface clears WCAG AA, measured on composited pixels. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WDvkyqqHABm4bmth2kjAxE	2026-08-16 13:42:06 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	88c653215d	feat(admissions): show the last distance offered where councils publish it ... Adds the cut-off distance a parent actually asks about — "how close do we need to live?" — end to end: a Singer tap, dbt staging and mart models, an Airflow DAG, and a tile on both detail templates. 3,597 schools across 57 local authorities carry a figure; the rest are unchanged. There is no national source for this. Each LA publishes its own cut-offs in its own format, and the collected CSV is transcribed from PDFs, spreadsheets and web pages — so most of the work here is deciding what is safe to show. Data * tap-uk-school-distance loads the CSV verbatim into raw. Keyed on (urn, year, school_name), because school_name carries the admission route: (urn, year) alone collides on 118 keys and a reload would have silently dropped every band but one. * stg_school_distance applies a 25 m – 25 km plausibility band. The source contains 0.0-mile rows (published where a school filled on a higher criterion), 1-metre cut-offs, and one reading 533 miles — ~4% of rows, all of which would put a visibly wrong number on a live page. * fact_admission_distance collapses routes to one row per school per year using the furthest, and keeps route_count so the page can say the figure is the widest of several bands rather than the one for a given child. Serving * Kept out of fact_admissions: that mart is EES-derived and near-complete for England, this one covers 57 LAs, and the two refresh independently. * Latest year only. Coverage is ragged — a school may have 2021 and 2026 and nothing between — so a history array would invite a trend line drawn through gaps that are absences of publication, not of a cut-off. * The Admissions section now renders on either source. 3% of the schools that render have a cut-off and no EES admissions row, and gating on admissions alone would have hidden the figure on those pages. Interface * The year travels with the figure everywhere it appears; a cut-off detached from its admissions round is not a fact about anything. * "Not a fixed catchment — it moves every year" sits under every instance, because that is the inference a parent will otherwise draw. * Replaces a hardcoded "Historical distance cut-off data is not available for this school" that appeared on every secondary page, including the ones whose council does publish it. The absence is now stated only when it is real, and names the authority that would hold it. The tint costs the muted tokens their AA margin: measured on the composited backdrop (not the computed one, which reports the untinted card), --text-muted falls to 4.09:1 in dark theme. The tile uses --text-secondary instead — 6.50:1 dark, 6.60:1 light. The DAG is manual, like the other annual ones: councils publish on allocation day, each on its own timetable, so there is no date worth scheduling against. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WDvkyqqHABm4bmth2kjAxE	2026-08-15 22:48:30 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	59ac9c10b9	fix(charts): make the national-average marker visible on both templates ... The marker was var(--brand) — the identical value to the bar fill it sits on. Measured by pixel-sampling every bar on both templates, in both themes: primary SatsChart .natTick 1.00:1 (6 bars) secondary .att8VizNatLine 1.00:1 Not low contrast. The same colour. It scored 5.47:1 only against the empty track, which means it was visible precisely when a school was BELOW the national average and vanished for every school at or above it — failing for exactly the schools people are looking for. No single colour fixes this, because the marker's position is data-driven: it can land on the bar, on the empty track, or across the boundary. It is now a knockout — a light core carrying a dark edge, both from tokens that flip with the theme, so one part or the other always separates: on the bar on the track light 5.47 / 9.70:1 15.17:1 dark 7.81 / 10.85:1 13.52:1 THE LEGEND DESCRIBED A CHART THAT DID NOT EXIST Both data swatches were var(--status-above) green while their bars were var(--brand) teal, and the two were identical to each other — one swatch for two series. Worse, the only swatch matching the bar colour was the one labelled "National average", so reading the chart by matching colours told you the teal bars were the benchmark. Each swatch now carries its bar's exact value, and the marker swatch mirrors the knockout. TWO SERIES, ONE COLOUR Expected and Exceeding were both var(--brand), distinguished only by row. They are a sequential pair — exceeding is the same cohort at a harder bar — so they take two steps of one hue, the harder measure being the step further from the ground in each theme. They measure 1.77:1 (light) and 1.39:1 (dark) against each other, and that is accepted rather than overlooked: two fills that must EACH clear 3:1 against the same white track are geometrically forced close together. The distinction is carried by the row labels and printed values; colour is redundant here, not load-bearing. THE TEST THAT SHOULD HAVE CAUGHT THIS The WCAG journey composites backgrounds by walking the ancestor chain, but these markers are absolutely positioned over a sibling — ancestor-walking is structurally blind to overlap, which is why this shipped in two templates and passed every gate. The new journey asks the stacking order instead, via document.elementsFromPoint. Writing it surfaced a second trap worth recording: elementsFromPoint takes viewport coordinates and returns an empty stack off-screen, and these markers sit ~1200px down. The first version defaulted an empty stack to white, which made teal-on-teal look like teal-on-white and PASS in the light theme. It now scrolls each marker into view and counts any marker it cannot resolve a backdrop for as a failure rather than a pass. Verified both directions: the new journey fails against current staging with "1.00:1 over rgb(15,118,110)" in both themes, and passes against this build with 6/6 markers measured at 5.47–15.17:1. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-15 09:48:41 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	8d50afef1e	fix(design): meet AA on tinted surfaces, and stop the footer inverting in dark ... Full audit across home, search, rankings, admissions, compare, and primary / secondary / special / no-data school pages, in both themes, measuring computed styles rather than reading CSS. Contrast: the status hues were specced against --bg-primary, but they are used as chip text on their own tint, which sits on cards and secondary surfaces rather than the page ground. Measured in the wild they were 3.85–4.44:1 — under AA — on Ofsted badges, delta chips, report-card chips and metric values, i.e. most of the product's actual signal. Darkened the light hues (#0e6e66 → #0b625a, #9a5b00 → #7f4a00) and lifted the dark teal (#3fb3a4 → #4fc0b0) so each clears AA on its own tint, which is the worst case rather than the easy one. Chart and series ramps follow. The footer was painting itself with a text token and lettering itself with a background token: `background: var(--text-primary); color: var(--bg-secondary)`. That reads correctly in one theme and inverts in the other — in dark mode it became a light slab at the bottom of a dark page, with amber section headings at 1.98:1. Added --surface-sunken and its on-* companions, which stay dark in BOTH themes (deliberately not --surface-inverse, whose whole job is to flip), and moved the footer onto them. Section headings were also using a status hue purely as decoration; they are now a muted on-surface token. The "Open full map" pill was a fixed white background with a themed text colour, so in dark mode it rendered light violet on white at 1.84:1. Both sides are token-driven now. Tabular numerals are now the default for .main rather than per-component opt-in, with prose opting back out — a handful of figures (miniNatPill, compareRowVal, factVal) had been missed by the class-name-based pass. Added a two-theme AA gate over home, rankings and admissions. It waits for `transition: color` to settle first: an earlier measurement pass read mid-transition values and reported seven failures that did not exist at rest. Worth stating plainly — most of what a naive audit flags here is its own artifact, and the check has to account for that to be worth having. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-06 15:38:31 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	8c3a5cc4e9	fix(design): keep below/attention off the brand hue, harden the share-card fonts ... Review follow-up on #86. The blind coral -> brand rename recreated the exact collision this PR set out to remove: coral had been both the primary CTA and the "below average" signal, so every negative indicator followed --primary onto iris. Sixteen rules moved back onto the status ramp — delta chips, trend-down arrows, progress-negative values, statusBad, chipBad/badgeBad, and the urgent deadline chips. The Ofsted scale had also lost its worst step, with grade 4 landing on brand while 1-2 were teal and 3 was amber. It now escalates by weight rather than by reaching for another hue: a tinted amber chip for "requires improvement", a solid amber one for "inadequate" (5.1:1 light, 7.7:1 dark). Report-card grade 5 follows the same rule. globals.css now describes status as valence — teal above/good, amber below/needs-attention — which is what it has to mean for an urgent deadline, rather than the narrower "comparison point only" the first draft claimed. On the share-card fonts: /opengraph-image is prerendered, so the font read happens in the builder stage where assets/ exists, and the baked PNG ships inside .next/standalone/.next/server/app/. File tracing independently places the fonts at .next/standalone/assets, which the existing standalone COPY carries to /app/assets. So the reported ENOENT doesn't occur — but it depends on the tracer resolving a runtime join(), and a miss would be a silent 500 rather than a build failure. Declared outputFileTracingIncludes for the route and made the Dockerfile COPY explicit so neither is left to inference. Also repointed the immutable Cache-Control rule from the deleted favicon.svg to app/icon.svg, where it was caching a 404. Verified: tsc clean, 159/159 tests, clean rebuild prerenders all three image routes with the fonts present in standalone. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-06 12:29:53 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	8ab0ac0a04	feat(design): adopt the Cohort identity — new palette, type, mark and dark theme ... Implements the direction agreed from the identity board: Route C ("Cohort") with the paper ground from C1, the Schibsted Grotesk / Literata pairing from C2, and the iris accent from C3. Dark theme is in scope from the start rather than retrofitted. The audit found three things wrong beyond taste: * No brand asset set. og:image was absent entirely, so every link shared into a class WhatsApp group rendered as a bare grey card. apple-touch-icon pointed at an SVG, which iOS ignores, and the manifest shipped no PNGs, so Android installs had no icon. The header mark and the favicon had also drifted into two different logos. * No colour discipline. --primary and --trend-down were the same coral, so the main CTA and "below average" shared a hue. 58 distinct hex values were spread across component CSS, and the chart palette was still Chart.js's stock demo colours. * A dark theme that was declared but never built — themeColor announced a dark variant with no dark styling behind it. What changed: Colour now has exactly three jobs that never borrow each other's hues: brand (iris) for interactive and identity, status (teal/amber) for above/below a comparison point, and phase for categories. Teal/amber rather than green/red keeps the above/below signal readable for every form of colour blindness. Every chromatic literal in component CSS is now a token, and the JS-painted surfaces (Chart.js, Leaflet) read the tokens through lib/theme so they follow the theme instead of ignoring it. The mark is the five-bar cohort spread — the same object as the distribution strip inside a school row, built from opacity steps so it inverts cleanly. components/Logo.tsx is the single source; the favicon, apple-icon and share card all derive from its geometry. globals.css drops 123 dead global classes left over from the vanilla-JS app (only the btn family, .skip-link and .main were still referenced), along with the noise overlay. It also gains prefers-reduced-motion support, which was missing entirely, and a type scale so the 54 ad-hoc font sizes have somewhere to converge. Verified: tsc clean, 159 unit tests pass, production build succeeds and prerenders /icon.svg, /apple-icon and /opengraph-image. Three e2e journeys added for the asset set, the themeColor/background match, and the dark theme actually repainting — all silent failures that nothing on the page reveals. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-06 12:13:04 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	2f786787b9	style(detail): merge the two detail stylesheets ... Builds components/school/schoolSections.module.css from the primary module, plus 35 secondary-only rules, so shared section components have one stylesheet. Three categories of difference, handled separately so nothing changes visually: - 7 incidental-drift properties unioned in (overflow-wrap, word-break, min-width, user-select) -- fixes that landed on one page and were never back-ported. Also fixes latent long-school-name overflow on the page that lacked them. - 4 genuinely visual class differences kept as explicit variants: genderBar, heroStatValue, genderSplitBoys, genderSplitGirls. font-weight on the genderSplit pair was reclassified from drift to visual -- unioning it would have bolded the primary page. - 17 rules that exist only in the secondary stylesheet but target shared class names (.card, .sectionTitle, .metricCard). Applied flat these would restyle the primary page, so they are scoped under .secondaryScope, which only SecondarySchoolSections will carry. Audited: every rule in both original stylesheets is a subset of the merged one (0 MISSING, 0 LOST), excluding the documented variants. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-01 21:18:15 +01:00