a72323874f7aebdb2e64b6d64a5febd61152d09d
20
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
a72323874f |
feat(admissions): add the cut-off history, map and postcode check
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 17s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 44s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 2m39s
Completes the last-distance-offered feature against the mockup: the year-by-year record, the same numbers drawn over real streets, and the reader's own address measured against them. Serving the history The first cut deliberately served only the latest year, because a plain series would draw a trend line straight through gaps that are absences of publication, not of a cut-off. That reasoning is answered rather than abandoned: cutoffYearRows classifies every year in the span, and the chart breaks the line rather than interpolating across it. A missing year is not one fact but three. It may be unpublished; it may be a year the school was not oversubscribed; or there may be no record at all. Collapsing them into "no data" throws away the reassuring case and hides the important caveat, so each is stated in words in the table. The claim is held to what the data supports. fact_admissions.oversubscribed compares FIRST PREFERENCES against places, which does not establish that every applicant was offered one — so the copy says "places available on first preferences" and a test asserts the stronger claim never appears. The trend summary is not a verdict It names both endpoints and their years and lets the reader conclude. It is withheld below four published points, and a swing under a tenth of the earlier figure is reported as "broadly the same" rather than dressed up as a direction. The postcode check This is the only place on the site that answers a question about a family rather than a school, so most of the care went into what it refuses to say. postcodes.io returns a centroid covering roughly fifteen addresses, which against a 500 m cut-off is a fifth of the whole distance — so a margin inside 100 m returns "too close to call" rather than a place a family does not have. Unpublished years count as unknown, never as a pass. The limits are stated before the check is used, not revealed with the answer. The postcode is geocoded in the browser and never stored. Both templates Banded and selective secondaries are exactly where this matters most, so the detail is shared. The primary page gives it a third tab; the secondary page is one flat panel by design and renders it inline. Absence is explained rather than reported. A selective school's missing figure is explained by how it admits; a consistently undersubscribed school reads as good news. Also makes the batch loader's test double honour ORDER BY. It was a no-op, so "latest row per URN" was really "first row in the fixture" and the test would have passed with the sort reversed or removed. Verified: 214 frontend tests, 54 backend, 45/53 e2e green against staging (the 8 cut-off journeys skip until the DAG runs). Rendered offline against the real compiled CSS in both themes and at 390px; every new surface clears WCAG AA, measured on composited pixels. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WDvkyqqHABm4bmth2kjAxE |
||
|
|
88c653215d |
feat(admissions): show the last distance offered where councils publish it
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 31s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 44s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Failing after 2m7s
Adds the cut-off distance a parent actually asks about — "how close do we
need to live?" — end to end: a Singer tap, dbt staging and mart models, an
Airflow DAG, and a tile on both detail templates. 3,597 schools across 57
local authorities carry a figure; the rest are unchanged.
There is no national source for this. Each LA publishes its own cut-offs in
its own format, and the collected CSV is transcribed from PDFs, spreadsheets
and web pages — so most of the work here is deciding what is safe to show.
Data
* tap-uk-school-distance loads the CSV verbatim into raw. Keyed on
(urn, year, school_name), because school_name carries the admission
route: (urn, year) alone collides on 118 keys and a reload would have
silently dropped every band but one.
* stg_school_distance applies a 25 m – 25 km plausibility band. The source
contains 0.0-mile rows (published where a school filled on a higher
criterion), 1-metre cut-offs, and one reading 533 miles — ~4% of rows,
all of which would put a visibly wrong number on a live page.
* fact_admission_distance collapses routes to one row per school per year
using the furthest, and keeps route_count so the page can say the figure
is the widest of several bands rather than the one for a given child.
Serving
* Kept out of fact_admissions: that mart is EES-derived and near-complete
for England, this one covers 57 LAs, and the two refresh independently.
* Latest year only. Coverage is ragged — a school may have 2021 and 2026
and nothing between — so a history array would invite a trend line drawn
through gaps that are absences of publication, not of a cut-off.
* The Admissions section now renders on either source. 3% of the schools
that render have a cut-off and no EES admissions row, and gating on
admissions alone would have hidden the figure on those pages.
Interface
* The year travels with the figure everywhere it appears; a cut-off
detached from its admissions round is not a fact about anything.
* "Not a fixed catchment — it moves every year" sits under every instance,
because that is the inference a parent will otherwise draw.
* Replaces a hardcoded "Historical distance cut-off data is not available
for this school" that appeared on every secondary page, including the
ones whose council does publish it. The absence is now stated only when
it is real, and names the authority that would hold it.
The tint costs the muted tokens their AA margin: measured on the composited
backdrop (not the computed one, which reports the untinted card), --text-muted
falls to 4.09:1 in dark theme. The tile uses --text-secondary instead — 6.50:1
dark, 6.60:1 light.
The DAG is manual, like the other annual ones: councils publish on allocation
day, each on its own timetable, so there is no date worth scheduling against.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WDvkyqqHABm4bmth2kjAxE
|
||
|
|
5044c24895 |
refactor(detail): extract derived flags and nav items to lib
Pure data-shape logic moves out of the client components so page.tsx can compute the section list on the server without importing them. The secondary page is not a variant of the primary one -- different section ids (gcse, wellbeing), different flags, and History gated on more than one year rather than at least one -- so it gets its own computeSecondaryFlags and buildSecondaryNavItems rather than bending a shared function. Adds 16 unit tests covering the all-through and special-school branches, previously reachable only through a full component render. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
dc85254ad2 |
fix(compare): a no-results school no longer blanks the trend chart
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 13s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 49s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 54s
Adding a school with no performance data to a comparison made every school's trend line disappear until that school was removed. Root cause: /api/compare returns such a school with a single phantom yearly_data row (the dim_school LEFT JOIN) whose year is null. In buildCompareChart, Math.trunc(null) is 0, so the axis was seeded at year 0; fillAcademicYears then walked 0, 101, 202, … and hit its 50-step cap long before reaching the real years, leaving every school's series mapped entirely to null. Fix: ignore yearly rows without a real numeric year when building the axis and the per-school year map. Regression test added. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
ae6ef6860b |
fix: don't portray special schools as failing the mainstream benchmark
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 46s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
Special schools, PRUs and alternative provision teach pupils with SEND who sit the same KS2/KS4 assessments but very few reach the mainstream "expected standard". Their headline attainment is therefore ~0% (or a very low Attainment 8), and the site was comparing that to the England average and painting it red — e.g. Greenmead School (a community special school) rendered as "0.0% — −62 pts below England average" with three 0% red SATs bars. That portrays a special school as catastrophically failing against a benchmark that doesn't fit it. Add a shared `isSpecialSchool()` helper (detects every DfE special-school establishment type — all contain "special" — plus PRUs / alternative provision) and drop the mainstream England comparison + "below" framing for these schools across every surface: - Detail (primary + secondary): a plain-English context note explaining the school is special and why the comparison isn't shown; England-average delta chips, "England avg" hints, the SATs national markers, the Attainment-8 "vs national" bar and the trend chart's England overlay are all suppressed. An all-zero placeholder SATs row hides the (empty) subject bar chart and the "why is combined lower" bridge. - Rankings / search rows (primary + secondary): the mainstream RWM / Attainment 8 stat shows "—" with no "vs national" delta, instead of "0% · −62 vs national". - Compare: special schools' attainment values are dropped (no misleading dot at 0% / no "Below England average" chip); progress banding, which IS a fair measure for special schools, is kept. Belt-and-braces zero-guard: a whole-row zero attainment (special or a suppressed cohort) is also treated as not-comparable, while a legitimate single 0 (e.g. 0% exceeding at a mainstream school) stays comparable. Tests: new isSpecialSchool unit tests (every DfE special type matched, no mainstream false positives); an e2e journey asserts Greenmead shows the special-school note and no England-average comparison. tsc clean; 108/108 unit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB |
||
|
|
fdda52ff0a |
fix(detail): filter Ofsted sentinel codes, show sixth-form judgement, label carried-forward grades
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 11s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 46s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 1m23s
Batch A of applying compare-screen learnings to the detail page (points 2-3):
- Point 2: the legacy OEIF sub-judgement grid rendered any non-null value
via OFSTED_LABELS[value], so Ofsted's sentinel code 9 ('not applicable')
leaked as an undefined label, and the sixth-form judgement was dropped
entirely. New shared ofstedLegacyAreas() helper returns only real grades
(1-4) and includes Sixth Form provision. Both detail views + the
all-same-grade check use it.
- Point 3: the OEIF disclaimer always claimed 'Ofsted no longer makes an
overall judgement' even when showing a carried-forward grade. It's now
grade_source-aware and labels carried-forward grades as such, matching
the compare screen.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
|
||
|
|
5ec4f3f7cd |
fix(list/map): badge report-card schools as Report Card, not their carried-forward grade
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 17s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 47s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 2m48s
The search-result cards and map pins keyed report-card detection off
ofsted_framework === 'ReportCard', but the API sets ofsted_framework to the
raw event grouping ('Schools - S5'); worse, ofsted_grade (the carried-forward
legacy grade) was checked first and won. So report-card schools were badged
by their old grade — Barclay's pin/card read 'Outstanding · 2021' instead of
'Report Card · 2026'. Same root cause as the detail-page fix, different
surface.
Expose ofsted_rc_date on the list serialization (the report-card inspection
date, non-null only for report cards) and make both badge builders treat a
present rc-date as winning over any grade, using its year. Removes the dead
framework === 'ReportCard' branches.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
|
||
|
|
f3fa12806b |
fix(compare): expert should-fixes S1-S4, S6 — banded chips, P8 reason, KS4 gap caption, all-through framing, cohort sizes
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 49s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 3m8s
S1: first-choice chip banded (More than half / About 1 in 3 / Over 1 in 4
missed out) so a 44%-offered grammar isn't understated by half.
S2: Progress 8 explains its absence for 2024/25+ cohorts (no KS2 baseline,
COVID) instead of a bare 'No data'.
S3: KS4 trend charts get their own honest gap caption (2019/20-2020/21
unpublished; later years not in our dataset yet); y-axis 'Value'→'Score';
buildCompareChart exposes englandOnlyYears.
S4: all-through schools labelled in chips, rail caption says 'N schools ·
<phase> view' for mixed baskets, whole-school roll no longer judged
against the single-phase median, community section carries an all-ages
caveat.
S6 (spec §8.5): disadvantaged attainment shows the cohort behind it
('of ~50 disadvantaged pupils').
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
|
||
|
|
5944d88f0b |
fix(compare): expert sign-off must-fixes — phase-matched admissions, Ofsted sentinel codes, selective-school copy
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m4s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 17s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 46s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 2m53s
M1: admissions rounds are now selected by the active phase tab (admissionsForPhase) — an all-through school's Year 7 round no longer masquerades as Reception odds beside pure primaries; honest per-cell and section fallbacks name the round (Reception / Year 7). M2: Ofsted sentinel codes (9 = not applicable) never render as judgement chips, and the sixth-form judgement — previously dropped — now renders for schools that have one. M3: 'What this means' is phase- and type-aware: selective schools get entrance-test framing, secondary faith schools a faith-criteria note, and the primaries' distance template never appears on the secondary tab (admissions_policy now exposed in compare school_info). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB |
||
|
|
b4b0249a06 |
Fix Ofsted transitional inspections, phase tab exclusions, and FSM benchmark comparison
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 8s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 19s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 47s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Failing after 10s
|
||
|
|
66bc5523f6 |
fix(compare): mobile measure-first cards to match the mockup
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 11s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 41s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 2m57s
The grid sections (At a glance, Ofsted, Getting a place, Who goes there) collapsed generically on mobile — grey label pills, full names wrapping to 3 lines, no dots — making the page ~2x the mockup's height and 'significantly different' from the mobile design. Each measure is now wrapped in a <Measure> that is display:contents on desktop (so the label + cells still flow into the shared aligned grid, unchanged) and a white card on mobile with compact [dot][short name] [value] rows — matching the mobile mockup. The sticky school bar becomes scrollable short-name pills on mobile too. Adds a shortName() util. Desktop layout is unchanged (display:contents dissolves the wrapper). Validated the card mechanism and real content shapes (report-card cell, badges, %+chip rows) via static previews at both widths. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB |
||
|
|
519584f34b |
feat(compare): trends explorer with England line; gap-honest axis; series regression guard
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB |
||
|
|
2573cd2490 |
feat(compare): academics strips with England anchors and More measures
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB |
||
|
|
48ca042b08 |
feat(compare): comprehension logic (report cards, admissions, verdicts, strips)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB |
||
|
|
45ab479062 |
feat(ui): mark proposed-to-close schools in listings and detail pages
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m46s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 21s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 50s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 35s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 1m1s
Amber tag in listing rows (option A) and a slim notice strip under the detail-page header (option E): proposed for closure, formal process not necessarily started, check with the local authority before applying. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
22769b6295 |
feat(compare): readable comparison chart on mobile
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m36s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 5s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 44s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 2m49s
The compare chart squashed clustered schools into a thin band (y pinned 0-100) under an in-chart title + per-school legend that ate ~40% of a 300px card, leaving converging lines indistinguishable on phones. - Auto-fit the y-axis to the data on all viewports (computeYBounds in lib/utils: padded + min-span for percentages, symmetric around 0 for progress, fitted for scores; negative pct-named trend metrics are not zero-clamped). - Distinct point style per school (circle/triangle/rect/rectRot/star) as secondary encoding for convergence and colour-blindness. - Mobile: drop in-chart title/legend/axis titles; add a chip row (colour dot + name) that doubles as tap-to-focus — highlights one school's line and dims the rest. Chart card 300px -> 340px, nearly all plot. - Fix a latent colour mismatch: datasets were built from Object.entries whose integer-like URN keys enumerate in ascending numeric order, desyncing line colours from card colours; the chart now receives the ordered school list. - Union years across schools instead of taking the first school's. - Extract PerformanceChart's matchMedia pattern into hooks/useIsMobile. Unit tests for metricKind/computeYBounds; e2e journey covers the mobile chips and focus toggle. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
4a52735356 |
feat(sdlc): staging environment + automated staging→prod pipeline
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 10m0s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 48s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 17s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 41s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 24s
- pr-checks.yml: PR gate — frontend typecheck+jest, backend import smoke, image builds (no push), Claude AI review posted as PR comment (severe findings block merge) - deploy.yml (replaces build-and-push.yml): merge to main builds+pushes images tagged sha-<sha>/staging, deploys the staging Portainer stack via webhook, runs Playwright E2E journeys against staging, then retags the verified images :prod (previous kept as :prod-previous) and deploys prod - docker-compose.portainer.staging.yml: second Portainer stack — :staging images, sc_staging_* names, own macvlan IPs, Airflow on 8081; data bootstrapped from source via the staging Airflow DAGs - prod compose now pins :prod instead of :latest (only the promotion step moves it; :latest is no longer published) - e2e/: 6 Playwright journeys (search, postcode, detail, compare, rankings) driven by BASE_URL — the promotion gate - scripts/ci/ai_review.py: Claude review with structured JSON findings - docs/DEPLOY.md: full SDLC doc incl. one-time setup checklist and rollback - replaced removed 'next lint' with tsc typecheck; fixed stale jest tests (slug URLs, N/A formatting, stable trend, fake-timer setup) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01PqGhF93UrpDNvXBLMjJENL |
||
|
|
ce2bfea91b |
fix(search): badge inspected-but-ungraded schools as "Inspected", not "Not yet inspected"
Build and Push Docker Images / Build Backend (FastAPI) (push) Successful in 13s
Build and Push Docker Images / Build Frontend (Next.js) (push) Successful in 54s
Build and Push Docker Images / Build Pipeline (Meltano + dbt + Airflow) (push) Successful in 12s
Build and Push Docker Images / Trigger Portainer Update (push) Successful in 1s
A school inspected under the OEIF framework after September 2024 has an inspection on record (ofsted_date set) but no overall_effectiveness grade, since Ofsted no longer issues an overall judgement. buildOfstedListBadge had no branch for this and fell through to "Not yet inspected", while the detail page's hero chip correctly reported it as inspected — so the same school read two contradictory ways. Add an "Inspected · YYYY" branch that fires when an inspection is on record (date or framework present) but no grade and not a Report Card, mirroring the hero chip's fallback. Genuinely un-inspected schools (all Ofsted fields null) still show "Not yet inspected". Add an .ofstedInspected badge style (neutral slate) distinct from the grey pending state, and cover both cases with tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
8a6758b591 |
feat(utils): add buildOfstedListBadge helper and fetchNationalAverages
- Add ofsted_framework field to School type - Add OfstedListBadge interface and buildOfstedListBadge pure function to utils.ts - Add fetchNationalAverages API function that calls GET /api/national-averages - Add test suite for buildOfstedListBadge (all 6 new tests pass) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
ff7f5487e6 |
Complete Next.js migration with SSR and Docker deployment
- Migrate from vanilla JavaScript SPA to Next.js 16 with App Router - Add server-side rendering for all pages (Home, Compare, Rankings) - Create individual school pages with dynamic routing (/school/[urn]) - Implement Chart.js and Leaflet map integrations - Add comprehensive SEO with sitemap, robots.txt, and JSON-LD - Set up Docker multi-service architecture (PostgreSQL, FastAPI, Next.js) - Update CI/CD pipeline to build both backend and frontend images - Fix Dockerfile to include devDependencies for TypeScript compilation - Add Jest testing configuration - Implement performance optimizations (code splitting, caching) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |