32 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
TudorandClaude Opus 5.5	587cfe3f0b	fix(compare): give every basket entry a real phase ... Review of the per-phase limit found entries reaching the basket with no phase, and a phase-less entry holds a slot in both groups: - Nearby-school cards added without one. The API now returns each peer's own phase (its pool is a phase group, so an all-through school can sit beside a primary); the button passes it through, and an older API simply leaves the conservative both-groups count in place. - Baskets saved before this change were never migrated. The compare page now backfills missing phases from the data it already fetches, and never overwrites a phase the basket has. - "16 plus" counted against both groups; it is secondary, as the API's PHASE_GROUPS files it. Also rewraps the HomeView doc comment the previous commit left awkward. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-30 12:04:39 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5.5	d1688ac150	copy(web): replace em dashes in public copy ... Rewrites every visitor-facing string that used an em dash, choosing the punctuation for what the dash was doing: a colon before a list or explanation, a comma for an aside, a full stop between two thoughts, parentheses for an aside mid-sentence. Covers page titles and meta descriptions, the home and admissions guide copy, school page headings and notes, the compare page, metric labels and tooltips. Two rewrites also fix the sentence around them: the closure banner no longer repeats "proposed for closure", and the cut-off caveat's list of priorities now parses. A lone dash marking a missing value in a table cell stays: it is a data convention, not prose. A Jest guard walks the source with the TypeScript parser and fails on any other em dash in a string or JSX text node. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-24 22:04:27 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	0571d1c0ff	fix(web): stop the sheet-open rule stealing .sectionNav's layout ... Review catch, and a bad one: the previous commit anchored its insertion on `padding: 0.5rem 0.75rem;` and closed .sectionNav there. Everything that followed in the rule — margin-bottom, box-shadow, display: flex, align-items, gap — was orphaned into .sectionNavSheetOpen, which is only applied while the mobile jump sheet is open. So the sticky nav lost its flex layout, spacing and shadow in the closed state, which is virtually every page view on every school detail page. A site-wide regression introduced by a fix for one mobile menu. Redone by anchoring on the complete rule, closing brace included, so nothing can be orphaned. .sectionNav is now byte-identical to main and the diff is purely additive; .sectionNavSheetOpen carries the z-index and nothing else. The staging experiment that validated this fix set nav.style.zIndex = '1100' with every other declaration intact, so it was always testing this version rather than the broken one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-22 20:43:58 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	180d6e9b3e	fix(web): lift the jump sheet above the bottom tab bar ... On mobile the last item in "Jump to section" was painted over by the fixed bottom tab bar and could not be tapped. Reported as nearby schools missing from the menu; it was there, underneath the bar. The sticky nav sets `position: sticky` with `z-index: 10`, which makes it a stacking context. The sheet's own `z-index: 1600` therefore orders it only inside that context — against the tab bar (z-index 1000) the nav's 10 is what counts, so the bar wins. Verified on staging: every menu item returns itself from elementFromPoint except the last, which returns the tab bar. Latent rather than new. With five sections the list stopped just above the bar; "Nearby schools" made six, and the sixth is the first to reach it. Any section added later would have done the same. Lifted only while the sheet is open, and only to 1100 — above the bar, below the comparison toast (2000), the fullscreen map (5000) and the info popover (9999). The backdrop rises with it, so tapping over the bar now dismisses the sheet instead of navigating away. The journey asks what a thumb asks: for each item, whether it is the topmost element at its own centre. A bounding-box check cannot see this — the item is in the viewport and the right size, just underneath something. Confirmed to fail against current staging, naming "Nearby schools", before the fix. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-22 20:35:25 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	cd6a45bf7d	refactor: rename similar → nearby, so the code says what the section does ... The section ranks on distance and is headed "Other schools nearby", but every identifier still called it "similar" — the exact drift that leaves a later reader trusting a name over the behaviour. Mechanical: files, the module, the payload key, the type, the components, the prop. No behaviour change; the suites are unchanged in count and still green. Free to do now because #150 has not merged, so the payload key rename needs no lockstep deploy. Uses of "similar" that are ordinary English — progress measures compared to similar pupils, and unrelated comments — are untouched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-22 13:06:32 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	5c0ccc693d	fix: order nearby schools by distance, not by how alike they are ... Reported from staging: a Catholic primary showed six Catholic primaries, none of them close enough to be a real option, and omitted the community school down the road. Three causes, compounding. Ranking put tier before distance, so a faith match at 2.9 miles outranked a community school at 0.3. The ENOUGH=3 stopping rule — added so a cap of six would not drag in weak distant matches — filled the row from the best tier before it ever widened, which is what made every card Catholic. And a 3-mile tier-1 radius is sane for a secondary and most of a city for a primary, whose catchments are routinely under a mile. The premise was backwards. For a parent, distance is a constraint and intake is a preference; a school beyond a primary catchment is not a weaker option, it is not an option. So distance now decides the order and nothing else does. The hard filters are untouched — they were always where the defensibility lived. Similarity survives as chips on the card: reported, so a reader applies their own weighting, rather than ranked, so we apply ours for them. Reach is capped per phase (primary 2, secondary 6, post-16 10) as a sanity bound, not a target: ordering already handles density, so the cap only decides what happens where an area is sparse. A primary with nothing inside two miles now renders no section, which is the honest answer. Deleted: the tier system, the stopping rule, the tier-dependent lede, the `tier` field, the tier-3 fallback chip and its style. select_similar also stops taking is_secondary — it reads the phase from the subject's own row, so no caller can hand it one that disagrees with the data. The heading is now "Other schools nearby". The hard filters still guarantee a comparable set, but nothing ranks on likeness, so the heading no longer says it does. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-22 13:06:32 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	2175dccb7c	fix(api): treat "16 plus" as secondary, the way PHASE_GROUPS already does ... GIAS phase 6 is "16 plus", and PHASE_GROUPS deliberately files it in the secondary group. The payload helper decided the same question with `"secondary" in phase_text`, which that value does not satisfy — so a sixth-form college was handed the primary bucket and offered infant schools as its peers, with the KS2 metric key to label them. No crash; just a page confidently showing the wrong schools. The decision now lives in similar_schools.is_secondary_phase, beside the PHASE_GROUPS bucket it selects from, so the two cannot drift again. A test pins them together. The same binary assumption had a second output. computeSchoolFlags tests for the substring too, so a 16-plus school renders the primary template, and the composer was labelling the section from the template: "Other primary schools near <sixth form college>" above a row of secondaries. The section now derives its noun from the school's own phase, which also removes the duplicated wording from both composers. A 16-plus school's candidates span the whole secondary group, so no single noun fits and it gets the honest general one. Reported in review on #150. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-22 06:41:49 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	4e0d8bcf87	feat(web): render similar schools on both detail templates ... Inside SchoolDetailShell rather than after it, because the sticky nav's scroll-spy finds sections with getElementById and can only reach one that lives in the shell. Last in the order, and last in the nav, because the two must agree or the nav links to an anchor that was never rendered. hasSimilarSchools is optional on NavItemsInput, matching hasLocation beside it: absent has to mean "no section", and making it required would have churned ten unrelated call sites for no added safety. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-21 22:42:59 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	91314a80b5	feat(web): similar schools section, honest about what it matched ... Server-rendered cards inside a client carousel that scrolls rather than paginates, so all six links stay in the initial HTML and the row still works with JavaScript off. Three client islands, split by what each needs: a school, the whole selection, a DOM ref. The lede claims a similar intake only when no card came from tier 3, chips list what a school actually shares, a missing figure reads "Not published", and the neighbour's number carries no valence colour — green and terracotta mean "against England" everywhere else, and colouring it here would read as ranking the neighbours. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-21 22:41:40 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	d65eb58883	fix(seo): build the phase links the docstring already promised ... Review caught _places_payload documenting a `phase_url` the function never returned. The docstring was not stray prose: the approved design included the phase variant — "Primary schools in Beccles" was one of its four example links — and it was dropped during implementation without being mentioned. Deleting the sentence would have closed the report while losing the feature, so the links are built instead. These are the pages that most needed them. ~950 phase variants were once reachable by nothing at all: absent from every sitemap and unlinked from the place page. "Primary schools in brentwood" is the query they exist to answer. Membership is read from the registry's own `phase_urns` rather than re-derived from the school's phase string. The registry already decides which phases a place publishes and which schools are listed on each, so asking it is both shorter and the only way the link cannot disagree with the page it points at. It also means outcodes need no special case: they carry empty `phase_urns` by design, because nobody searches "primary schools in SW11", so they report no phase links on their own. `phases` is a list rather than a single url. An all-through school is listed on both the primary and secondary pages, so there is no tie to break and no reason to invent one. Each entry renders directly after its own place, so "22 primary schools in Brentwood" reads as part of Brentwood rather than as an unrelated link further along the row. The e2e journey now follows a phase link where the town publishes one and asserts it resolves. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DXnXQKnPpZBBP61fBQiFkq	2026-09-14 20:54:59 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	7f5f0fb676	feat(seo): link school pages into the location layer ... W2 shipped ~5,000 place pages and nothing linked into them. The location layer pointed down at school pages; school pages pointed nowhere on the site. Their only anchor was the school's own website, so the ~27k pages carrying most of the site's inbound authority passed it straight off-site, and the new corpus was reachable mainly through the sitemap. Three things close the loop. A reverse index over the place registry, places_for_urn, answers which published places contain a school. Derived from the registry rather than stored beside it, so the two cannot disagree about which places exist: a place below the publish threshold is absent from the registry and therefore never offered as a link. A test asserts that invariant across every place in a built registry. GET /api/schools/{urn} gains a `places` array carrying the name, count and canonical path for each. It rides on the request the page already makes, so the school page costs no extra round trip. The frontend types it optional and defaults it to empty, because the two images deploy separately and a frontend ahead of the API must render without it. The page gains a "More schools near here" module and a BreadcrumbList. The module orders narrowest first, because a reader on a school page wants its town before its county, while the API orders widest first for the trail. Anchors state their destination's size — "37 schools in Brentwood" — which is worth more to a reader and a crawler than "see more". With no published places it renders nothing rather than an empty heading. The trail is rooted at the homepage, not /schools. There is no /schools index page; the location layer lives only at /schools/[place], /schools/authority/[la] and /schools/near/[outcode]. Rooting it at the bare path would have opened every breadcrumb with a link to a 404. Outcodes are omitted from the trail: "schools near CM15" is a real query and a useful link, but nobody navigates Essex to CM15 to a school, and a breadcrumb claiming that describes a hierarchy the site does not have. School pages also now declare the School type rather than EducationalOrganization, the parent type that covers universities and nurseries alike. The e2e journey asserts the round trip in both directions, following a place page's own first school so the pair is genuinely related rather than hardcoded. A one-way link is what already existed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DXnXQKnPpZBBP61fBQiFkq	2026-09-14 20:45:50 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	cbe3a9a772	fix(destinations): the table said 'withheld' for a category that just doesn't apply ... The Share column keyed off `percentage === null`, which is true for not_applicable as well as suppressed, so a destination that does not apply to the school was labelled as one DfE withheld — while the Pupils column in the same row rendered blank. Two columns, one row, disagreeing about what the row was, and one of them making a claim about DfE that wasn't true. Both columns now derive from `status`, which is the distinction the mart, the SQLAlchemy model and the serialiser all preserve deliberately: published shows the figure, suppressed shows the withheld badge, not_applicable shows an em-dash with a title saying so. A published count with no published percentage now derives its share from the cohort rather than falling through to a marker — both halves are published, so nothing withheld is involved, and it is the same derivation the bar widths already use. Verified the new tests fail against the old logic before keeping them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BvdDKvFFSZuMVDH5fEyTob	2026-08-30 21:48:39 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	102397fe69	fix(destinations): withhold at the API, not just in the chart ... Code review found the disclosure the whole design was meant to prevent. R1 was written as a rendering rule and implemented as one: canRenderBar stopped the bar being drawn, but GET /api/schools/{urn} still carried the cohort and every published category. cohort - sum(published) returned Whitley Bay's withheld further-education figure exactly — 18 pupils — to any caller, and the RSC payload put it in the browser too. app.py already stated the principle for admission_distance: this endpoint is public and unauthenticated, so a field left in the payload is a published field. The same reasoning applies here and did not get applied. _mask_for_disclosure now closes both identities before serialisation — categories sum to the cohort, and disadvantaged + other = all — by adding secondary suppression until every row and column hides none or at least two. My first attempt picked the smallest published cell as the companion and a new test caught it choosing a zero, which protects nothing: the residual still resolved to 18. The companion must carry pupils. DfE's own aggregates are no longer served. Nothing rendered them, and one spanning a single suppressed component names it. Cost, measured over 262 mainstream secondaries: the all-pupils bar survives on 94% rather than 100%. Zero lone-suppressed groups remain. The e2e helper now tells a missing feature apart from missing data: it fails if the API serves no destinations key at all, and skips if the key is served but the annual DAG has not populated the marts. Failing on the second would redden the staging gate for unrelated commits. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BvdDKvFFSZuMVDH5fEyTob	2026-08-28 19:58:02 +01:00
Tudor	68a192e430	Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into feat/ks4-destinations ... # Conflicts: # nextjs-app/__tests__/components/darkThemeSafety.test.ts	2026-08-28 18:45:27 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	2b4cf20d75	feat(destinations): the post-16 section, replacing the placeholder ... The 'Post-16 destination data coming soon' note is deleted rather than reworded: for a school with no sixth form the truthful statement is that the question does not apply, and a placeholder there implies something is missing. hasSixthForm and .sixthFormNote go with it — nothing else used them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BvdDKvFFSZuMVDH5fEyTob	2026-08-28 16:15:21 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	cef2f77149	feat(destinations): the After Year 11 section ... Question cards over one bar, with the cards acting as a lens on the bar rather than a summary beside it — focusing a card dims everything it is not made of, so the grouping we chose is inspectable rather than asserted. The bar renders only when canRenderBar allows it. Where a category is withheld the section says so and shows the table instead: the categories sum to the cohort, so a bar drawn from the published segments leaves a gap whose width is the withheld figure. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BvdDKvFFSZuMVDH5fEyTob	2026-08-28 16:14:13 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	7a16b1b52f	fix(admissions): flag-off pages must not speak for the council ... The secondary admissions section words the absence of a cut-off distance: "<LA> has not published a cut-off distance for this school." That sentence is true when the authority publishes nothing. It is false when the authority does publish and the admission_distance flag is simply off — and off is the current state, so every secondary page with an EES admissions row has been making a claim about a council on our behalf. The backend already draws the distinction the copy needs. /api/schools/{urn} omits the admission_distance key entirely while the flag is dark rather than sending null, precisely so that "we are not publishing cut-offs" stays distinguishable from "this school has no cut-off"; lib/types.ts says so in as many words. The page then collapsed the two with `?? null` before the section ever saw them. So stop collapsing it: thread the raw field to SecondarySchoolSections and word the absence only when the feature is on. Null still gets the sentence naming the authority — that case is unchanged and still tested. Primary pages are unaffected: AdmissionsSection carries no absence copy and renders nothing when there is no figure. DistanceSection already treated absent and null alike; only its type widens. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FuPUioHpxtaiDNagQvjxyM	2026-08-27 21:17:16 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	9abd020967	fix(e2e): scope the Distance-tab assertion, and separate the tile figures ... The failing journey was wrong; the page was correct. Locator: getByRole('button', { name: 'Distance' }) Expected: 0 Received: 1 getByRole matches accessible names by case-insensitive SUBSTRING, so { name: 'Distance' } matched <button>Show this distance on a map</button> — the map toggle added by the same feature. The assertion was meant to say "no Distance tab in the admissions segmented control" and instead said "no button anywhere whose label contains the word distance". Now scoped to the control it is about, via its own aria-label, and read positively: the tab list must contain "This year" and must not contain "Distance". An absence check against an unscoped locator passes for the wrong reason the moment the selector stops matching, which is exactly how the regression this test guards would return unnoticed. Two sibling locators had the same weakness and are tightened: 'Check' is a prefix of the button's own busy label "Checking…", and the figure matcher accepted `(miles|m)` — a leftover from the mixed-unit era that would have kept passing if the headline regressed to metres, which is the thing #105 just fixed. Tightening that matcher surfaced a real defect behind it. The cut-off figure and its metric support are flex children with the gap drawn by CSS and nothing between them in the text layer, so the element read "0.88 miles1.4 km" — what a screen reader announces, and why a `miles\b` boundary could never match. Both templates now carry an explicit space. Whitespace text nodes are not rendered as flex items, so the reading changes and the layout does not. Verified against staging: 54/54. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WDvkyqqHABm4bmth2kjAxE	2026-08-20 21:01:28 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	ea5249a2ea	fix(admissions): state distance in miles throughout, never mixed ... The postcode check read "69 m away — inside the September 2026 cut-off of 0.17 miles". Both numbers are right and the sentence is still useless: the reader has to convert one of them to check a comparison we had already made for them. The cause was a readability rule of mine in formatCutoffDistance, which swapped to metres below 100m on the grounds that "0.04 miles" carries less than "69 m". Taken one figure at a time that holds. Taken in a sentence containing two figures it guarantees a mismatch whenever they fall either side of the threshold — and a 270m cut-off with a nearby home does exactly that. Miles now lead everywhere. It is the unit UK school admissions runs on: councils publish cut-offs in miles (90% of the collected source rows), and it is what a parent has already been quoted in their booklet and offer letter. The metric figure survives only as support beside the miles figure on the Admissions tile, where it converts the same value rather than presenting a second one to compare. Below 0.01 miles the decimal places run out rather than the unit being wrong, so a very short distance is described — "under 0.01 miles" — instead of rounding to a flat "0.00 miles", which would read as no distance at all. Both figures in the verdict now go through one formatter with no fallback that could reach for another unit. The old `?? "N m"` fallbacks on that line were a second route to the same defect and are gone. Covered by a sweep over sixty home/cut-off combinations spanning the old switch point, asserting no verdict contains a metric reading and that exactly two miles figures appear; plus the reported case pinned verbatim, and an e2e guard on the rendered verdict. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WDvkyqqHABm4bmth2kjAxE	2026-08-20 20:35:05 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	c9a1892bfb	feat(admissions): publish the latest cut-off only, holding history back ... Earlier years are to become a paid feature, so they stop being published. The load-bearing part is that this is a change to the API, not only to the page. /api/schools/{urn} is public and unauthenticated: leaving admission_distance_history in the payload while declining to render it would have handed the whole record to anyone who opened the network tab. It is withheld at the source, and the page follows. Nothing changes upstream. The tap, the plausibility band and fact_admission_distance are untouched and still load every published year, so restoring history for entitled callers is a change to one function in data_loader rather than a re-collection. What the reader now gets is the latest figure on the Admissions tile, and a Distance section that answers the question the number alone cannot: whether their own address falls inside it. Retitled to "How far away are you?", which is what it now does — the previous title described a record that is no longer there. Removed with the history: the trend chart, the year-by-year table, the per-year verdict strip, the trend summary and the coverage note, along with their CSS. The section goes from 743px to 417px. One consequence worth naming. A run of years used to soften a single close call — a home just outside one year's cut-off was usually inside another. With one year published, the "too close to call" band is the entire safety margin between a parent and a place they do not have, so the verdict now names its year, and the three outcomes are tinted apart rather than distinguished by wording alone. The existing stylesheet test earned its keep here: the three verdict classes were referenced before they were written, and it caught them. Unstyled, a "beyond the cut-off" result would have been indistinguishable from an "inside" one — the exact failure the longhand class map was written to prevent. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WDvkyqqHABm4bmth2kjAxE	2026-08-20 18:44:57 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	94151c58ea	fix(admissions): move the cut-off detail into its own section ... The admissions card measured 1503px on a live school page — half the height of every section put together, and nearly three times the next largest — with its default view rendering as four tiles adrift in about 1080px of blank card. The cause was a layout trick meeting content it was never sized for. The admissions views are stacked in one grid cell so switching them never shifts layout, and the hidden ones keep their box: only visibility is dropped. That works while the views are comparable. The distance view added in #102 carries a chart, a table and a map, came to 1402px against the tile grid's 316px, and pinned every other view to its height — including the one that renders by default, which nobody had clicked. Rather than only unpinning it, the detail moves out. Every other topic on the page is a section with a nav entry, and "how close did we need to live, and would we have got in?" is a topic, not a variant reading of the intake figures. The headline number stays on the Admissions tile where the intake story is; the record behind it now lives in a Distance section directly below. admissions 1503px -> 554px distance new -> 743px (median section on the page is ~528px) Three further changes, each of which also makes the content better rather than only shorter: * The map renders on request. Before a postcode is entered it is a circle drawn round a school, and it costs a Leaflet bundle and 240px to say so; a successful check opens it automatically, which is the point at which it starts answering something. Map height 320px -> 240px. * The chart appears only at the four published years that let the summary state a direction. Below that we already refuse to call the series a trend, and a line through three points asserts one regardless of what the sentence beneath it admits. The table carries those years anyway, with the reasons a line cannot show. * Three caveat paragraphs become one. They said walking-route twice and made the same point about priorities in two voices. It now sits in CutoffDistanceDetail rather than inside the check, so it still renders for a school with coordinates missing, where there is a table but no map and no check. The new e2e guard asserts no section exceeds 2.5x the median section height. Measuring the card's internals cannot catch this: the tile grid is flex: 1, so it absorbs the stretch and every box still looks full. The first version of this test targeted an arbitrary primary, passed against the live bug, and proved nothing; pointed at a school that actually holds cut-off history it fails on staging with "#admissions is 1459px against a 526px median". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WDvkyqqHABm4bmth2kjAxE	2026-08-20 14:54:02 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	a72323874f	feat(admissions): add the cut-off history, map and postcode check ... Completes the last-distance-offered feature against the mockup: the year-by-year record, the same numbers drawn over real streets, and the reader's own address measured against them. Serving the history The first cut deliberately served only the latest year, because a plain series would draw a trend line straight through gaps that are absences of publication, not of a cut-off. That reasoning is answered rather than abandoned: cutoffYearRows classifies every year in the span, and the chart breaks the line rather than interpolating across it. A missing year is not one fact but three. It may be unpublished; it may be a year the school was not oversubscribed; or there may be no record at all. Collapsing them into "no data" throws away the reassuring case and hides the important caveat, so each is stated in words in the table. The claim is held to what the data supports. fact_admissions.oversubscribed compares FIRST PREFERENCES against places, which does not establish that every applicant was offered one — so the copy says "places available on first preferences" and a test asserts the stronger claim never appears. The trend summary is not a verdict It names both endpoints and their years and lets the reader conclude. It is withheld below four published points, and a swing under a tenth of the earlier figure is reported as "broadly the same" rather than dressed up as a direction. The postcode check This is the only place on the site that answers a question about a family rather than a school, so most of the care went into what it refuses to say. postcodes.io returns a centroid covering roughly fifteen addresses, which against a 500 m cut-off is a fifth of the whole distance — so a margin inside 100 m returns "too close to call" rather than a place a family does not have. Unpublished years count as unknown, never as a pass. The limits are stated before the check is used, not revealed with the answer. The postcode is geocoded in the browser and never stored. Both templates Banded and selective secondaries are exactly where this matters most, so the detail is shared. The primary page gives it a third tab; the secondary page is one flat panel by design and renders it inline. Absence is explained rather than reported. A selective school's missing figure is explained by how it admits; a consistently undersubscribed school reads as good news. Also makes the batch loader's test double honour ORDER BY. It was a no-op, so "latest row per URN" was really "first row in the fixture" and the test would have passed with the sort reversed or removed. Verified: 214 frontend tests, 54 backend, 45/53 e2e green against staging (the 8 cut-off journeys skip until the DAG runs). Rendered offline against the real compiled CSS in both themes and at 390px; every new surface clears WCAG AA, measured on composited pixels. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WDvkyqqHABm4bmth2kjAxE	2026-08-16 13:42:06 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	88c653215d	feat(admissions): show the last distance offered where councils publish it ... Adds the cut-off distance a parent actually asks about — "how close do we need to live?" — end to end: a Singer tap, dbt staging and mart models, an Airflow DAG, and a tile on both detail templates. 3,597 schools across 57 local authorities carry a figure; the rest are unchanged. There is no national source for this. Each LA publishes its own cut-offs in its own format, and the collected CSV is transcribed from PDFs, spreadsheets and web pages — so most of the work here is deciding what is safe to show. Data * tap-uk-school-distance loads the CSV verbatim into raw. Keyed on (urn, year, school_name), because school_name carries the admission route: (urn, year) alone collides on 118 keys and a reload would have silently dropped every band but one. * stg_school_distance applies a 25 m – 25 km plausibility band. The source contains 0.0-mile rows (published where a school filled on a higher criterion), 1-metre cut-offs, and one reading 533 miles — ~4% of rows, all of which would put a visibly wrong number on a live page. * fact_admission_distance collapses routes to one row per school per year using the furthest, and keeps route_count so the page can say the figure is the widest of several bands rather than the one for a given child. Serving * Kept out of fact_admissions: that mart is EES-derived and near-complete for England, this one covers 57 LAs, and the two refresh independently. * Latest year only. Coverage is ragged — a school may have 2021 and 2026 and nothing between — so a history array would invite a trend line drawn through gaps that are absences of publication, not of a cut-off. * The Admissions section now renders on either source. 3% of the schools that render have a cut-off and no EES admissions row, and gating on admissions alone would have hidden the figure on those pages. Interface * The year travels with the figure everywhere it appears; a cut-off detached from its admissions round is not a fact about anything. * "Not a fixed catchment — it moves every year" sits under every instance, because that is the inference a parent will otherwise draw. * Replaces a hardcoded "Historical distance cut-off data is not available for this school" that appeared on every secondary page, including the ones whose council does publish it. The absence is now stated only when it is real, and names the authority that would hold it. The tint costs the muted tokens their AA margin: measured on the composited backdrop (not the computed one, which reports the untinted card), --text-muted falls to 4.09:1 in dark theme. The tile uses --text-secondary instead — 6.50:1 dark, 6.60:1 light. The DAG is manual, like the other annual ones: councils publish on allocation day, each on its own timetable, so there is no date worth scheduling against. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WDvkyqqHABm4bmth2kjAxE	2026-08-15 22:48:30 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	59ac9c10b9	fix(charts): make the national-average marker visible on both templates ... The marker was var(--brand) — the identical value to the bar fill it sits on. Measured by pixel-sampling every bar on both templates, in both themes: primary SatsChart .natTick 1.00:1 (6 bars) secondary .att8VizNatLine 1.00:1 Not low contrast. The same colour. It scored 5.47:1 only against the empty track, which means it was visible precisely when a school was BELOW the national average and vanished for every school at or above it — failing for exactly the schools people are looking for. No single colour fixes this, because the marker's position is data-driven: it can land on the bar, on the empty track, or across the boundary. It is now a knockout — a light core carrying a dark edge, both from tokens that flip with the theme, so one part or the other always separates: on the bar on the track light 5.47 / 9.70:1 15.17:1 dark 7.81 / 10.85:1 13.52:1 THE LEGEND DESCRIBED A CHART THAT DID NOT EXIST Both data swatches were var(--status-above) green while their bars were var(--brand) teal, and the two were identical to each other — one swatch for two series. Worse, the only swatch matching the bar colour was the one labelled "National average", so reading the chart by matching colours told you the teal bars were the benchmark. Each swatch now carries its bar's exact value, and the marker swatch mirrors the knockout. TWO SERIES, ONE COLOUR Expected and Exceeding were both var(--brand), distinguished only by row. They are a sequential pair — exceeding is the same cohort at a harder bar — so they take two steps of one hue, the harder measure being the step further from the ground in each theme. They measure 1.77:1 (light) and 1.39:1 (dark) against each other, and that is accepted rather than overlooked: two fills that must EACH clear 3:1 against the same white track are geometrically forced close together. The distinction is carried by the row labels and printed values; colour is redundant here, not load-bearing. THE TEST THAT SHOULD HAVE CAUGHT THIS The WCAG journey composites backgrounds by walking the ancestor chain, but these markers are absolutely positioned over a sibling — ancestor-walking is structurally blind to overlap, which is why this shipped in two templates and passed every gate. The new journey asks the stacking order instead, via document.elementsFromPoint. Writing it surfaced a second trap worth recording: elementsFromPoint takes viewport coordinates and returns an empty stack off-screen, and these markers sit ~1200px down. The first version defaulted an empty stack to white, which made teal-on-teal look like teal-on-white and PASS in the light theme. It now scrolls each marker into view and counts any marker it cannot resolve a backdrop for as a failure rather than a pass. Verified both directions: the new journey fails against current staging with "1.00:1 over rgb(15,118,110)" in both themes, and passes against this build with 6/6 markers measured at 5.47–15.17:1. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-15 09:48:41 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	8d50afef1e	fix(design): meet AA on tinted surfaces, and stop the footer inverting in dark ... Full audit across home, search, rankings, admissions, compare, and primary / secondary / special / no-data school pages, in both themes, measuring computed styles rather than reading CSS. Contrast: the status hues were specced against --bg-primary, but they are used as chip text on their own tint, which sits on cards and secondary surfaces rather than the page ground. Measured in the wild they were 3.85–4.44:1 — under AA — on Ofsted badges, delta chips, report-card chips and metric values, i.e. most of the product's actual signal. Darkened the light hues (#0e6e66 → #0b625a, #9a5b00 → #7f4a00) and lifted the dark teal (#3fb3a4 → #4fc0b0) so each clears AA on its own tint, which is the worst case rather than the easy one. Chart and series ramps follow. The footer was painting itself with a text token and lettering itself with a background token: `background: var(--text-primary); color: var(--bg-secondary)`. That reads correctly in one theme and inverts in the other — in dark mode it became a light slab at the bottom of a dark page, with amber section headings at 1.98:1. Added --surface-sunken and its on-* companions, which stay dark in BOTH themes (deliberately not --surface-inverse, whose whole job is to flip), and moved the footer onto them. Section headings were also using a status hue purely as decoration; they are now a muted on-surface token. The "Open full map" pill was a fixed white background with a themed text colour, so in dark mode it rendered light violet on white at 1.84:1. Both sides are token-driven now. Tabular numerals are now the default for .main rather than per-component opt-in, with prose opting back out — a handful of figures (miniNatPill, compareRowVal, factVal) had been missed by the class-name-based pass. Added a two-theme AA gate over home, rankings and admissions. It waits for `transition: color` to settle first: an earlier measurement pass read mid-transition values and reported seven failures that did not exist at rest. Worth stating plainly — most of what a naive audit flags here is its own artifact, and the check has to account for that to be worth having. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-06 15:38:31 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	8c3a5cc4e9	fix(design): keep below/attention off the brand hue, harden the share-card fonts ... Review follow-up on #86. The blind coral -> brand rename recreated the exact collision this PR set out to remove: coral had been both the primary CTA and the "below average" signal, so every negative indicator followed --primary onto iris. Sixteen rules moved back onto the status ramp — delta chips, trend-down arrows, progress-negative values, statusBad, chipBad/badgeBad, and the urgent deadline chips. The Ofsted scale had also lost its worst step, with grade 4 landing on brand while 1-2 were teal and 3 was amber. It now escalates by weight rather than by reaching for another hue: a tinted amber chip for "requires improvement", a solid amber one for "inadequate" (5.1:1 light, 7.7:1 dark). Report-card grade 5 follows the same rule. globals.css now describes status as valence — teal above/good, amber below/needs-attention — which is what it has to mean for an urgent deadline, rather than the narrower "comparison point only" the first draft claimed. On the share-card fonts: /opengraph-image is prerendered, so the font read happens in the builder stage where assets/ exists, and the baked PNG ships inside .next/standalone/.next/server/app/. File tracing independently places the fonts at .next/standalone/assets, which the existing standalone COPY carries to /app/assets. So the reported ENOENT doesn't occur — but it depends on the tracer resolving a runtime join(), and a miss would be a silent 500 rather than a build failure. Declared outputFileTracingIncludes for the route and made the Dockerfile COPY explicit so neither is left to inference. Also repointed the immutable Cache-Control rule from the deleted favicon.svg to app/icon.svg, where it was caching a 404. Verified: tsc clean, 159/159 tests, clean rebuild prerenders all three image routes with the fonts present in standalone. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-06 12:29:53 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	8ab0ac0a04	feat(design): adopt the Cohort identity — new palette, type, mark and dark theme ... Implements the direction agreed from the identity board: Route C ("Cohort") with the paper ground from C1, the Schibsted Grotesk / Literata pairing from C2, and the iris accent from C3. Dark theme is in scope from the start rather than retrofitted. The audit found three things wrong beyond taste: * No brand asset set. og:image was absent entirely, so every link shared into a class WhatsApp group rendered as a bare grey card. apple-touch-icon pointed at an SVG, which iOS ignores, and the manifest shipped no PNGs, so Android installs had no icon. The header mark and the favicon had also drifted into two different logos. * No colour discipline. --primary and --trend-down were the same coral, so the main CTA and "below average" shared a hue. 58 distinct hex values were spread across component CSS, and the chart palette was still Chart.js's stock demo colours. * A dark theme that was declared but never built — themeColor announced a dark variant with no dark styling behind it. What changed: Colour now has exactly three jobs that never borrow each other's hues: brand (iris) for interactive and identity, status (teal/amber) for above/below a comparison point, and phase for categories. Teal/amber rather than green/red keeps the above/below signal readable for every form of colour blindness. Every chromatic literal in component CSS is now a token, and the JS-painted surfaces (Chart.js, Leaflet) read the tokens through lib/theme so they follow the theme instead of ignoring it. The mark is the five-bar cohort spread — the same object as the distribution strip inside a school row, built from opacity steps so it inverts cleanly. components/Logo.tsx is the single source; the favicon, apple-icon and share card all derive from its geometry. globals.css drops 123 dead global classes left over from the vanilla-JS app (only the btn family, .skip-link and .main were still referenced), along with the noise overlay. It also gains prefers-reduced-motion support, which was missing entirely, and a type scale so the 54 ad-hoc font sizes have somewhere to converge. Verified: tsc clean, 159 unit tests pass, production build succeeds and prerenders /icon.svg, /apple-icon and /opengraph-image. Three e2e journeys added for the asset set, the themeColor/background match, and the dark theme actually repainting — all silent failures that nothing on the page reveals. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-06 12:13:04 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	e098ad4bd1	fix(detail): restore the shell's mobile header/nav CSS ... The server/client split moved the header and sticky nav markup into SchoolDetailShell, but their responsive rules stayed behind in schoolSections.module.css. CSS Modules hash class names per file, so those rules stopped matching entirely: on mobile the header details block never collapsed ("Show all details" e2e journey failed), the toggle itself never appeared, and the section-nav mobile swap (menu button in, link row out) never applied. Ports the stranded blocks into SchoolDetailShell.module.css verbatim: the 768px header block (stacked header, wrapped meta pills, details toggle + collapse) and the 640px section-nav blocks (scroll-fade mask, bottom-sheet panel, control swap). Adds a jest guard that every class a components/school component references is defined in the stylesheet that component imports — it fails on the three classes that had no rule at all here (headerDetailsOpen, atEnd, sectionNavBackLabel). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-06 10:31:12 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	803e68970c	refactor(detail): drop dead derived state from the shell ... Leftover from the mechanical extraction: the shell still called computeSchoolFlags() and derived isReportCard / ofstedInspectedDate / oeifAreas / oeifAllSameGrade / deprivationDesc / primaryAvg / secondaryAvg on every render, duplicating work page.tsx already does. None of those values were referenced in its JSX anymore -- that logic moved to the section composers. The chrome needs only four locally-derived values (latestResults, phase, isAllThrough, hasLocation), all one-liners over props it already owns. Removing them made seven props dead, which TypeScript caught at both call sites: absenceData, ofsted, admissions, admissionsHistory, deprivation, finance and nationalAvg now go straight to the section composers and never reach the client component. The shell's surface is down to schoolInfo, yearlyData, census, navItems and children. No behaviour change: 155 tests pass and the characterization tests remain byte-identical to the commit that introduced them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-02 21:54:59 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	752eb07310	refactor(detail): render sections on the server behind a client shell ... page.tsx now composes the sections and passes them through SchoolDetailShell as children, so ~1,300 lines of static markup stop shipping as client JavaScript. The shell keeps what is genuinely interactive: back link, header reveal, hero map, compare CTA, sticky nav and scroll-spy. The scroll-spy already located sections via document.getElementById, so it works unchanged against server-rendered children. Charts needed a client wrapper: next/dynamic with ssr:false is illegal in a Server Component, so components/school/charts.tsx is the boundary that keeps Chart.js (64 KB gz) lazy and browser-only. Measured on this build: - school route client chunk: 8 KB gz (33 KB raw) - total static JS across all chunks: 380.6 -> 350.7 KB gz - section markup is absent from every client chunk ("Got their first choice", "Ofsted reports", "Most deprived" etc. all return 0 hits); shell strings still present, as expected - shared baseline unchanged at 172 KB gz -- out of scope, as designed The 14 characterization tests pass byte-identical to the commit that introduced them. Only the render helper changed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-02 21:39:21 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	a7f6ff4035	refactor(detail): extract sections as server components ... Moves ~1,300 lines of section markup out of the two client views into components/school/, mirroring the components/compare/ layout. Twelve section components plus shared primitives, all server components. The only client file is AdmissionsViewToggle, which owns the hidden/aria-pressed state and receives both views as server-rendered children. JSX was extracted mechanically rather than retyped, so the markup the CSS modules depend on is verbatim. Sharing follows measured similarity, not assumption: - Finances (91%) shared. The secondary premises-cost card is gated behind a prop so primary pages are unchanged; enabling it is a one-line follow-up. - Ofsted (80%) shared, but behind a variant prop. The headline similarity hid a real fork: on a school with no overall grade the primary page shows a "Not rated" badge while the secondary shows a four-area OEIF panel, and the disclaimer copy differs. Both preserved exactly; reconciling them is a human decision, not a side effect of a move. - Admissions (14%) and History (40%) kept separate. Not yet wired up -- the old views still render. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-02 21:33:28 +01:00
TudorandClaude Opus 5	2f786787b9	style(detail): merge the two detail stylesheets ... Builds components/school/schoolSections.module.css from the primary module, plus 35 secondary-only rules, so shared section components have one stylesheet. Three categories of difference, handled separately so nothing changes visually: - 7 incidental-drift properties unioned in (overflow-wrap, word-break, min-width, user-select) -- fixes that landed on one page and were never back-ported. Also fixes latent long-school-name overflow on the page that lacked them. - 4 genuinely visual class differences kept as explicit variants: genderBar, heroStatValue, genderSplitBoys, genderSplitGirls. font-weight on the genderSplit pair was reclassified from drift to visual -- unioning it would have bolded the primary page. - 17 rules that exist only in the secondary stylesheet but target shared class names (.card, .sectionTitle, .metricCard). Applied flat these would restyle the primary page, so they are scoped under .secondaryScope, which only SecondarySchoolSections will carry. Audited: every rule in both original stylesheets is a subset of the merged one (0 MISSING, 0 LOST), excluding the documented variants. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-01 21:18:15 +01:00