6 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
TudorandClaude Opus 4.8	ae6ef6860b	fix: don't portray special schools as failing the mainstream benchmark ... Special schools, PRUs and alternative provision teach pupils with SEND who sit the same KS2/KS4 assessments but very few reach the mainstream "expected standard". Their headline attainment is therefore ~0% (or a very low Attainment 8), and the site was comparing that to the England average and painting it red — e.g. Greenmead School (a community special school) rendered as "0.0% — −62 pts below England average" with three 0% red SATs bars. That portrays a special school as catastrophically failing against a benchmark that doesn't fit it. Add a shared `isSpecialSchool()` helper (detects every DfE special-school establishment type — all contain "special" — plus PRUs / alternative provision) and drop the mainstream England comparison + "below" framing for these schools across every surface: - Detail (primary + secondary): a plain-English context note explaining the school is special and why the comparison isn't shown; England-average delta chips, "England avg" hints, the SATs national markers, the Attainment-8 "vs national" bar and the trend chart's England overlay are all suppressed. An all-zero placeholder SATs row hides the (empty) subject bar chart and the "why is combined lower" bridge. - Rankings / search rows (primary + secondary): the mainstream RWM / Attainment 8 stat shows "—" with no "vs national" delta, instead of "0% · −62 vs national". - Compare: special schools' attainment values are dropped (no misleading dot at 0% / no "Below England average" chip); progress banding, which IS a fair measure for special schools, is kept. Belt-and-braces zero-guard: a whole-row zero attainment (special or a suppressed cohort) is also treated as not-comparable, while a legitimate single 0 (e.g. 0% exceeding at a mainstream school) stays comparable. Tests: new isSpecialSchool unit tests (every DfE special type matched, no mainstream false positives); an e2e journey asserts Greenmead shows the special-school note and no England-average comparison. tsc clean; 108/108 unit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB	2026-07-20 20:39:16 +01:00
TudorandClaude Fable 5	b0c5b6bb57	fix(compare): anchor grade-5 & EBacc rows; restore secondary-button outline ... SF1 (expert sign-off): the secondary academics 'Grade 5+ in English & maths' and 'EBacc entry' rows rendered as bare numbers — the one place the 'every number anchored against the England average' promise broke. Both now show the official England anchor (already in the payload) + an Above/Close/Below verdict chip, matching Attainment 8 (which also gains a chip for consistency). Button affordance: globals.css has a duplicate .btn block whose 'border: none' overrode the base '1px solid transparent', so .btn-secondary/.btn-active's 'border-color' had no width — every outline button (the modal's '+ Compare', search-result '+ Compare', 'Comparing') rendered as borderless teal text. Give the outline variants the full 'border' shorthand so the outline renders regardless of the clobbered base. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB	2026-07-18 08:26:59 +01:00
TudorandClaude Fable 5	200a97d0b9	fix(compare): per-school P8 explanation; disadvantaged cohort from the same yearly row ... Review findings: (1) the 'no KS2 baseline (COVID)' explanation was derived from the basket-wide max year, so a school with an unrelated data gap borrowed it from a neighbour with 2024/25 data — now judged per school on its own latest year. (2) The '~N disadvantaged pupils' cohort multiplied eligible_pupils and disadvantaged_pct resolved independently across years — now both come from the same yearly row that supplies the displayed percentage. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB	2026-07-17 17:53:10 +01:00
TudorandClaude Fable 5	f3fa12806b	fix(compare): expert should-fixes S1-S4, S6 — banded chips, P8 reason, KS4 gap caption, all-through framing, cohort sizes ... S1: first-choice chip banded (More than half / About 1 in 3 / Over 1 in 4 missed out) so a 44%-offered grammar isn't understated by half. S2: Progress 8 explains its absence for 2024/25+ cohorts (no KS2 baseline, COVID) instead of a bare 'No data'. S3: KS4 trend charts get their own honest gap caption (2019/20-2020/21 unpublished; later years not in our dataset yet); y-axis 'Value'→'Score'; buildCompareChart exposes englandOnlyYears. S4: all-through schools labelled in chips, rail caption says 'N schools · <phase> view' for mixed baskets, whole-school roll no longer judged against the single-phase median, community section carries an all-ages caveat. S6 (spec §8.5): disadvantaged attainment shows the cohort behind it ('of ~50 disadvantaged pupils'). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB	2026-07-17 17:41:12 +01:00
Tudor	e74d3882ce	Pass phase state to compare sub-components to prevent phase metrics override by multi-phase schools	2026-07-15 17:38:02 +01:00
TudorandClaude Fable 5	2573cd2490	feat(compare): academics strips with England anchors and More measures ... Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB	2026-07-13 23:50:29 +01:00