fix: don't portray special schools as failing the mainstream benchmark
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 46s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 46s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
Special schools, PRUs and alternative provision teach pupils with SEND who sit the same KS2/KS4 assessments but very few reach the mainstream "expected standard". Their headline attainment is therefore ~0% (or a very low Attainment 8), and the site was comparing that to the England average and painting it red — e.g. Greenmead School (a community special school) rendered as "0.0% — −62 pts below England average" with three 0% red SATs bars. That portrays a special school as catastrophically failing against a benchmark that doesn't fit it. Add a shared `isSpecialSchool()` helper (detects every DfE special-school establishment type — all contain "special" — plus PRUs / alternative provision) and drop the mainstream England comparison + "below" framing for these schools across every surface: - Detail (primary + secondary): a plain-English context note explaining the school is special and why the comparison isn't shown; England-average delta chips, "England avg" hints, the SATs national markers, the Attainment-8 "vs national" bar and the trend chart's England overlay are all suppressed. An all-zero placeholder SATs row hides the (empty) subject bar chart and the "why is combined lower" bridge. - Rankings / search rows (primary + secondary): the mainstream RWM / Attainment 8 stat shows "—" with no "vs national" delta, instead of "0% · −62 vs national". - Compare: special schools' attainment values are dropped (no misleading dot at 0% / no "Below England average" chip); progress banding, which IS a fair measure for special schools, is kept. Belt-and-braces zero-guard: a whole-row zero attainment (special or a suppressed cohort) is also treated as not-comparable, while a legitimate single 0 (e.g. 0% exceeding at a mainstream school) stays comparable. Tests: new isSpecialSchool unit tests (every DfE special type matched, no mainstream false positives); an e2e journey asserts Greenmead shows the special-school note and no England-average comparison. tsc clean; 108/108 unit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0146VHeLAWjDVE2B5uU67jCB
This commit is contained in:
@@ -395,6 +395,22 @@
|
||||
line-height: 1.5;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Special-school context note: soft, informational (teal), not a warning. */
|
||||
.specialNote {
|
||||
background: var(--bg-secondary, #f3ede4);
|
||||
border-left: 4px solid var(--accent-teal, #2d7d7d);
|
||||
border-radius: 0 6px 6px 0;
|
||||
padding: 0.7rem 1rem;
|
||||
margin: 0 0 1rem;
|
||||
font-size: 0.9rem;
|
||||
line-height: 1.5;
|
||||
color: var(--text-secondary, #5c564d);
|
||||
max-width: 72ch;
|
||||
}
|
||||
.specialNote strong {
|
||||
color: var(--text-primary, #1a1612);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* ── Metrics Grid & Cards ────────────────────────────── */
|
||||
.metricsGrid {
|
||||
display: grid;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user