feat(brand): adopt the schoolcompare identity across the site
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 13s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 44s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 4m29s
PR Checks / Frontend Typecheck + Tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
PR Checks / Backend Smoke (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR Checks / Build Backend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 13s
PR Checks / Build Frontend (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 44s
PR Checks / Build Pipeline (no push) (pull_request) Successful in 10s
PR Checks / AI Code Review (Claude) (pull_request) Successful in 4m29s
Implements the supplied brand guideline: the pin-and-leaf mark, the lowercase schoolcompare wordmark, Manrope for headings and Inter for everything a person reads a number from, the deep-teal/coral/mustard/sage palette, and the rounder geometry the guideline asks for. The landing hero is rebuilt to the concept: a Sand panel carrying the proposition, the search and a trust line, with the brand landscape bleeding to the panel's right edge, followed by the four value props. Concept vs reality — where the guideline describes something this product does not have, the real feature takes its place and the decision is recorded in a code comment next to it: - The Thriving Score is not implemented. Four of its five sub-scores (pastoral, enrichment, community, facilities) have no source in DfE or Ofsted data, and its band names are Ofsted's own, which would sit beside the real Ofsted grade and be indistinguishable from it. - Guides, About, Favourites and Sign in are not added to the nav — there are no such pages and no accounts system. Rankings and Admissions, which the guideline omits, keep their places because they exist. - The fourth value prop is "Never miss a deadline" rather than "Save & revisit", which would need shortlisting. Two deviations from the supplied swatches, both forced by contrast and both confined to text and fills. Coral #F97360 under a white label measures 2.75:1 against a 4.5 floor, so --action is a darkened #BE3C27 and the original coral survives as --coral for tints, borders and illustration. Mustard #F2C94C is 1.5:1 as text, so --mustard-ink carries labels while --mustard stays exact for fills and rings. Every token clears AA on all three light grounds; Sand is the binding one, so several values sit a step darker than white alone would need. The guideline is light-only, but the site already ships a dark theme, so it is rebuilt from the same tokens rather than dropped. Verified: tsc clean, 159/159 unit tests, production build green, and the generated share card and app icon render from the new mark. The hero and the site chrome were rendered from the compiled CSS and the prerendered markup to confirm Manrope and Inter actually resolve — a font token that silently falls back has shipped here before.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -79,6 +79,16 @@ export function Navigation() {
|
||||
};
|
||||
}, []);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The brand guideline's nav also carries Guides, About, Favourites and a
|
||||
* "Sign in" button. None of the four is added here, deliberately: there are
|
||||
* no Guides or About pages, and Favourites and Sign in both need an accounts
|
||||
* system that does not exist. Drawing chrome for features we do not have
|
||||
* would be a promise the product cannot keep. Rankings and Admissions —
|
||||
* which the guideline omits — take their place, because they are real.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If accounts ever ship, this is the list to extend.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
const items = [
|
||||
{ href: '/', label: 'Search', Icon: SearchIcon },
|
||||
{ href: '/compare', label: 'Compare', Icon: CompareIcon },
|
||||
@@ -91,11 +101,18 @@ export function Navigation() {
|
||||
<header className={styles.header}>
|
||||
<div className={styles.container}>
|
||||
<Link href="/" className={styles.logo} aria-label="SchoolCompare home">
|
||||
{/*
|
||||
LogoMark's defaults are already correct for this ground: the pin
|
||||
takes var(--brand) and the leaf is knocked out in var(--bg-card),
|
||||
which is exactly the header's own background in both themes. No
|
||||
explicit pin/leaf needed here — the footer, which sits on the
|
||||
sunken teal band, does have to pass them.
|
||||
*/}
|
||||
<span className={styles.logoIcon}>
|
||||
<LogoMark />
|
||||
</span>
|
||||
<span className={styles.logoText}>
|
||||
School<span className={styles.logoTextAccent}>Compare</span>
|
||||
school<span className={styles.logoTextAccent}>compare</span>
|
||||
</span>
|
||||
</Link>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user