From 3fcb1340d442726aaef2771c9daa9dad4589c764 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tudor Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2026 10:43:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] docs: mark sixth-form flag pipeline change implemented Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 --- .../specs/2026-07-07-exam-phase-taxonomy-design.md | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-07-exam-phase-taxonomy-design.md b/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-07-exam-phase-taxonomy-design.md index 49832d9..0ff976a 100644 --- a/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-07-exam-phase-taxonomy-design.md +++ b/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-07-07-exam-phase-taxonomy-design.md @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ and is the only source that correctly classifies: - schools whose statutory age range extends to 18 on paper but which have no registered post-16 provision. -### Pipeline change (future work) +### Pipeline change (implemented 2026-07-07) 1. `stg_gias_establishments.sql`: add `"OfficialSixthForm (name)" as official_sixth_form`. @@ -152,6 +152,9 @@ and is the only source that correctly classifies: `has_sixth_form boolean` = `official_sixth_form = 'Has a sixth form'`. 3. Expose `has_sixth_form` on the school API payloads. +Implemented in `feat/gias-sixth-form-flag` — see +`docs/superpowers/plans/2026-07-07-gias-sixth-form-flag.md`. + ### Current heuristic — audit of `age_range` ~ "18" sites All must migrate to the `has_sixth_form` flag once exposed: